Description
No two cancers are alike. Cancer is a dynamic and heterogeneous disease, such heterogeneity arise among patients with the same cancer type, among cancer cells within the same individual’s tumor and even among cells within the same sub-clone over time.

No two cancers are alike. Cancer is a dynamic and heterogeneous disease, such heterogeneity arise among patients with the same cancer type, among cancer cells within the same individual’s tumor and even among cells within the same sub-clone over time. The recent application of next-generation sequencing and precision medicine techniques is the driving force to uncover the complexity of cancer and the best clinical practice. The core concept of precision medicine is to move away from crowd-based, best-for-most treatment and take individual variability into account when optimizing the prevention and treatment strategies. Next-generation sequencing is the method to sift through the entire 3 billion letters of each patient’s DNA genetic code in a massively parallel fashion.

The deluge of next-generation sequencing data nowadays has shifted the bottleneck of cancer research from multiple “-omics” data collection to integrative analysis and data interpretation. In this dissertation, I attempt to address two distinct, but dependent, challenges. The first is to design specific computational algorithms and tools that can process and extract useful information from the raw data in an efficient, robust, and reproducible manner. The second challenge is to develop high-level computational methods and data frameworks for integrating and interpreting these data. Specifically, Chapter 2 presents a tool called Snipea (SNv Integration, Prioritization, Ensemble, and Annotation) to further identify, prioritize and annotate somatic SNVs (Single Nucleotide Variant) called from multiple variant callers. Chapter 3 describes a novel alignment-based algorithm to accurately and losslessly classify sequencing reads from xenograft models. Chapter 4 describes a direct and biologically motivated framework and associated methods for identification of putative aberrations causing survival difference in GBM patients by integrating whole-genome sequencing, exome sequencing, RNA-Sequencing, methylation array and clinical data. Lastly, chapter 5 explores longitudinal and intratumor heterogeneity studies to reveal the temporal and spatial context of tumor evolution. The long-term goal is to help patients with cancer, particularly those who are in front of us today. Genome-based analysis of the patient tumor can identify genomic alterations unique to each patient’s tumor that are candidate therapeutic targets to decrease therapy resistance and improve clinical outcome.
Reuse Permissions
  • Downloads
    pdf (6.2 MB)

    Details

    Title
    • Integrative analysis of genomic aberrations in cancer and xenograft Models
    Contributors
    Date Created
    2015
    Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Note
    • Partial requirement for: Ph.D., Arizona State University, 2015
      Note type
      thesis
    • Includes bibliographical references (pages 123-132)
      Note type
      bibliography
    • Field of study: Biomedical informatics

    Citation and reuse

    Statement of Responsibility

    by Sen Peng

    Machine-readable links