Description

This article looks closely at two types of errors children have been shown to make with universal quantification—Exhaustive Pairing (EP) errors and Underexhaustive errors—and asks whether they reflect the same underlying phenomenon. In a large-scale, longitudinal study, 140 children were

This article looks closely at two types of errors children have been shown to make with universal quantification—Exhaustive Pairing (EP) errors and Underexhaustive errors—and asks whether they reflect the same underlying phenomenon. In a large-scale, longitudinal study, 140 children were tested 4 times from ages 4 to 7 on sentences involving the universal quantifier every.

Reuse Permissions
  • Downloads
    pdf (0 B)

    Download count: 0

    Details

    Date Created
    2017-05-09
    Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Identifier
    • Digital object identifier: 10.5334/gjgl.166
    • Identifier Type
      International standard serial number
      Identifier Value
      2397-1835
    Note

    Citation and reuse

    Cite this item

    This is a suggested citation. Consult the appropriate style guide for specific citation guidelines.

    Aravind, A., Villiers, J. D., Villiers, P. D., Lonigan, C. J., Phillips, B. M., Clancy, J., . . . Valiente, C. (2017). Children’s quantification with every over time. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 2(1), 43. doi:10.5334/gjgl.166

    Machine-readable links