Description
Self-Efficacy Theory (SET; Bandura, 1986, 2000) has generated research and practice ramifications across areas of psychology. However, self-efficacy has yet to be assessed in a legal context. The present paper juxtaposes self-efficacy with self-confidence in terms of theoretical foundations and practical implications, with attention to the area of witness testimony.
Copyright Statement
Download count: 0
Details
Contributors
- Cramer, Robert J. (Author)
- Neal, Tess M.S. (Author)
- Brodsky, Stanley L. (Author)
Date Created
The date the item was original created (prior to any relationship with the ASU Digital Repositories.)
2009
Resource Type
Collections this item is in
Identifier
- Digital object identifier: 10.1037/a0017310
Citation and reuse
Cite this item
This is a suggested citation. Consult the appropriate style guide for specific citation guidelines.
Cramer, R.J., Neal, T.M.S., & Brodsky, S.L. (2009). Self-efficacy and confidence: Theoretical distinctions and implications for trial consultation. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 61, 319-334. DOI: 10.1037/a0017310