Description

The Gratton effect, the observation that the size of the Stroop effect is larger following a congruent trial compared to an incongruent trial, is one pivotal observation in support of the conflict-monitoring hypothesis. Previous reports have demonstrated that non-conflict components,

The Gratton effect, the observation that the size of the Stroop effect is larger following a congruent trial compared to an incongruent trial, is one pivotal observation in support of the conflict-monitoring hypothesis. Previous reports have demonstrated that non-conflict components, such as feature binding, also contribute to this effect. Critically, Schmidt and De Houwer (2011) report a flanker task and a button-press Stroop task suggesting that there is no conflict adaptation in the Gratton effect; it is entirely caused by feature binding. The current investigation attempts to replicate and extend this important finding across two experiments using a canonical four-choice Stroop task with vocal responses. In contrast to Schmidt and De Houwer, we observe reliable conflict adaptation after controlling for feature binding. We argue that the overall strength of conflict is critical for determining whether a conflict adaptation component will remain in the Gratton effect after explaining binding components.

Reuse Permissions
  • Downloads
    pdf (591 KB)

    Details

    Title
    • The Gratton Effect Remains After Controlling for Contingencies and Stimulus Repetitions
    Contributors
    Date Created
    2014-10-24
    Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Identifier
    • Digital object identifier: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01207
    • Identifier Type
      International standard serial number
      Identifier Value
      1353-8292

    Citation and reuse

    Cite this item

    This is a suggested citation. Consult the appropriate style guide for specific citation guidelines.

    Blais, Chris, Stefanidi, Aikaterini, & Brewer, Gene A. (2014). The Gratton effect remains after controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 5:1207. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01207

    Machine-readable links