Description

Background
Little research has explored who responds better to an automated vs. human advisor for health behaviors in general, and for physical activity (PA) promotion in particular. The purpose of

Background
Little research has explored who responds better to an automated vs. human advisor for health behaviors in general, and for physical activity (PA) promotion in particular. The purpose of this study was to explore baseline factors (i.e., demographics, motivation, interpersonal style, and external resources) that moderate intervention efficacy delivered by either a human or automated advisor.
Methods

Reuse Permissions
  • application/pdf

    Download count: 0

    Details

    Contributors
    Date Created
    • 2013-09-22
    Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Identifier
    • Digital object identifier: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-109
    • Identifier Type
      International standard serial number
      Identifier Value
      1479-5868
    Note

    Citation and reuse

    Cite this item

    This is a suggested citation. Consult the appropriate style guide for specific citation guidelines.

    Hekler, E. B., Buman, M. P., Otten, J., Castro, C. M., Grieco, L., Marcus, B., . . . King, A. C. (2013). Determining who responds better to a computer- vs. human-delivered physical activity intervention: results from the community health advice by telephone (CHAT) trial. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 10(1), 109. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-10-109

    Machine-readable links