ASU Global menu

Skip to Content Report an accessibility problem ASU Home My ASU Colleges and Schools Sign In
Arizona State University Arizona State University
ASU Library KEEP
Main navigation
Home Browse Collections Share Your Work About
Skip to Content Report an accessibility problem ASU Home My ASU Colleges and Schools Sign In
  1. KEEP
  2. Programs and Communities
  3. Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Final Projects
  4. Nurse Practitioner Residency Programs and Provider Satisfaction
  5. Full metadata

Nurse Practitioner Residency Programs and Provider Satisfaction

Full metadata

Title
Nurse Practitioner Residency Programs and Provider Satisfaction
Description
Purpose & Background: Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) residency programs are meant to ease providers' transition into practice, but there is limited evidence about their overall effectiveness and impact on provider satisfaction. When a FNP residency program in the Southwestern United States found they had high resident provider attrition rates, it prompted an investigation into current and past residents’ satisfaction levels. Methods: Arizona State University’s (ASU’s) Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the project site’s review committee approved the project design for human subject protection. After approval, all current and past residents employed at the practice were e-mailed a link to SurveySparrow with the Misener Nurse Practitioner Job Satisfaction Scale (MNPJSS) and a demographic questionnaire in December 2021 and February 2022. Results: Mean satisfaction scores indicated “minimally satisfied” overall. When satisfaction was compared over time using a two-tailed independent t-test for an alpha value of 0.05, p = 0.731, indicating no significant change in satisfaction over two months. Total satisfaction and subscales of satisfaction were divided by cohort, averaged, and compared on a Likert scale from “1” (Very Dissatisfied) to “6” (Very Satisfied). Current residents’ average satisfaction score was M = 3.77. They were most satisfied with challenge and autonomy, M = 4.28, and least with collegiality, M = 3.26. Providers' one-year post-residency average satisfaction score was M = 3.98. They were most satisfied with benefits, M = 4.53, and least with time, M = 3.04. Providers' two-year post- residency average satisfaction score was M = 3.49. They were most satisfied with benefits, M = 4.56, and least with time, M = 2.90. Using Pearson Correlation tests there was no correlation between average satisfaction and average performance on Uniform Data Systems (UDS), r = 0.01, p = 0.968. Conclusions: Overall providers were “minimally satisfied.” Opportunities to make program improvements were identified and could help improve retention and reduce costs and provider shortages.
Date Created
2022-04-29
Contributors
  • Luedtke, M. Erin (Author)
  • Ochieng, Judith (Thesis advisor)
  • Arizona State University. College of Nursing & Healthcare Innovation (Contributor)
Topical Subject
  • Nurse practitioners
  • Internship and Residency
  • Satisfaction
Resource Type
Text
Extent
45 pages
Language
eng
Copyright Statement
In Copyright
Reuse Permissions
All Rights Reserved
Primary Member of
Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Final Projects
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.2.N.186423
Level of coding
minimal
Cataloging Standards
asu2
Collaborating institutions
College of Nursing and Health Innovation
System Created
  • 2023-05-15 10:27:20
System Modified
  • 2023-05-15 10:53:55
  •     
  • 3 years ago
Additional Formats
  • OAI Dublin Core
  • MODS XML

Quick actions

Back to item

About this Item

Copyright Statement
  • In Copyright
  • Reuse Permissions
  • All Rights Reserved
  •  Copy permalink
    Download count: 93

    Share this content

    Feedback

    ASU University Technology Office Arizona State University.
    KEEP
    Contact Us
    Repository Services
    Home KEEP PRISM ASU Research Data Repository
    Resources
    Terms of Deposit Open Access at ASU

    The ASU Library acknowledges the twenty-three Native Nations that have inhabited this land for centuries. Arizona State University's four campuses are located in the Salt River Valley on ancestral territories of Indigenous peoples, including the Akimel O’odham (Pima) and Pee Posh (Maricopa) Indian Communities, whose care and keeping of these lands allows us to be here today. ASU Library acknowledges the sovereignty of these nations and seeks to foster an environment of success and possibility for Native American students and patrons. We are advocates for the incorporation of Indigenous knowledge systems and research methodologies within contemporary library practice. ASU Library welcomes members of the Akimel O’odham and Pee Posh, and all Native nations to the Library.

    Maps and Locations Jobs Directory Contact ASU My ASU
    Repeatedly ranked #1 on 30+ lists in the last 3 years.
    Copyright and Trademark Accessibility Privacy Terms of Use Emergency