Skip to metadata.
Document
Download Options
Name Type Format Size
embryo125164.xhtml.pdf Service File
34.21 KB
embryo125164.xhtml Original File
8.19 KB

Details

Title
  • Litowitz v. Litowitz [Brief] (2002)
Description

Pursuant to an express provision of the embryo disposition contract they both signed, a husband and wife had to petition the court for instructions because they could not reach an agreement about what to do with frozen embryos when they…

Pursuant to an express provision of the embryo disposition contract they both signed, a husband and wife had to petition the court for instructions because they could not reach an agreement about what to do with frozen embryos when they divorced. The trial court awarded the pre-embryos to the husband and the Court of Appeals affirmed this decision. However, the Washington Supreme Court ruled that the pre-embryos should be thawed out and allowed to expire because the dispute had not been resolved within a five year time frame prescribed by the Cryopreservation Agreement. A dissenting opinion filed by one judge argued that the five year limit should not apply because of judicial delay in reaching a final decision.

Date Created
2008-05-09
Keywords
  • Legal
Collections this item is in

Machine-readable links