Description

Background. The purpose of this study was to compare the peak electromyography (EMG) of the most commonly-used position in the literature, the prone bent-leg (90°) hip extension against manual resistance

Background. The purpose of this study was to compare the peak electromyography (EMG) of the most commonly-used position in the literature, the prone bent-leg (90°) hip extension against manual resistance applied to the distal thigh (PRONE), to a novel position, the standing glute squeeze (SQUEEZE).

Reuse Permissions
  • application/pdf

    Download count: 0

    Details

    Contributors
    Date Created
    • 2015-09-22
    Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Identifier
    • Digital object identifier: 10.7717/peerj.1261
    • Identifier Type
      International standard serial number
      Identifier Value
      2167-8359
    Note

    Citation and reuse

    Cite this item

    This is a suggested citation. Consult the appropriate style guide for specific citation guidelines.

    Contreras, B., Vigotsky, A. D., Schoenfeld, B. J., Beardsley, C., & Cronin, J. (2015). A comparison of two gluteus maximus EMG maximum voluntary isometric contraction positions. PeerJ, 3. doi:10.7717/peerj.1261

    Machine-readable links