Description
Some ancient Greek perspectives on three praxial musical activities: composing, performing, and listening. Early founders of modern Western thought created boundaries and hierarchies among these three activities, in addition to the scientific study of music. Under the dualistic conception of reality, or "truth," original musical works became objects. Plato stipulated the use of "good" songs, reserved composition for a select few, and believed that "goodness" in music could be determined objectively by society's leaders, a form of universal "truth" represented in artistic products. The praxis of music performing, regarded as a "practiced habit" and given lower status than composing, was deemed an appropriate leisure-time activity for gentlemen. Virtuoso music performance was to be left to non-citizens, leaving citizens free for more intellectual pursuits. . . . [I]t is no surprising that subsequent educators taught music primarily through theoretical means. . . .
Details
Title
- Plato's Views on Three Modes of Music Education Praxis: Composing, Performing, and Listening
Contributors
- Humphreys, Jere Thomas (Author)
- Elliott, David J. (Respondent)
- Androutsos, Polyvios (Editor)
Date Created
The date the item was original created (prior to any relationship with the ASU Digital Repositories.)
2007
Subjects
Resource Type
Collections this item is in
Note
- A Greek translation of a presentation given in English, with an English abstract, and a response by David J. Elliott, also in English. Published in a special issue of a journal published by the Greek Society for Music Education.
Citation and reuse
Cite this item
This is a suggested citation. Consult the appropriate style guide for specific citation guidelines.
Humphreys, Jere T. “Plato’s Views on Three Modes of Music Education Praxis: Composing, Performing, and Listening.” Trans. to the Greek by Evita Simou. Musical Pedagogics. Special Issue: Praxial Philosophy of Music Education 4 (2007): 78-90, Polyvios Androutsos, ed., with an English abstract (p. 88) and a response (in English) by David J. Elliott (pp. 89-90).