The collection collates collections by schools, centers, programs, and research groups.

Displaying 1 - 10 of 52
Filtering by

Clear all filters

186404-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Background: People with diabetes are at greater risk for comorbid cardiovascular disease, end stage organ damage, disability, and early death. There is substantial evidence that individualizing self-care education, such as eating a healthy diet, greatly improves diabetes management. Objective: The purpose of this paper is to review the

Background: People with diabetes are at greater risk for comorbid cardiovascular disease, end stage organ damage, disability, and early death. There is substantial evidence that individualizing self-care education, such as eating a healthy diet, greatly improves diabetes management. Objective: The purpose of this paper is to review the outcomes of a diabetes education program offered to underserved women in the Southwestern United States. Methods: Four weekly nutrition classes were individualized and taught at a nonprofit organization in the southwest United States. Behavior change was measured using the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) tool. Classes were advertised via the center’s monthly class calendar and fliers. A total of nine participants (N=9) came to every class and took the SDSCA survey before and after class instruction. Results: Descriptive statistics and two 2-tailed t-tests with the critical value set at p<0.05 were used for data analysis. The participants were Hispanic women, most between the ages of 40-49, and had an income between $0-14,000. The mean difference between the variables of both general diet and specific diet pre and post-tests were significantly different from zero. The assumptions of normality and homogeneity were met. The results of both two-tailed paired sample t-tests were significant suggesting the means of general and specific diet pre-tests were significantly lower than the means of the general and specific diet post-tests. Discussion: The assumptions of normality and homogeneity were met and the results were significant. The pre-intervention scores for both categories were statistically significantly lower than the post-intervention scores for both categories. Thus, the desired outcome of helping clients within the organization modify, adapt, or change self-care behaviors related to diet was met.
Created2022-04-26
186391-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Medicare implemented a yearly Annual Wellness Visit (AWV) to improve quality patient care through early detection of declining health. However, there has been only partial provider participation since its inception, which potentially delays treatment and negatively impacts patient outcomes. The aim of this quality improvement project was to assess the

Medicare implemented a yearly Annual Wellness Visit (AWV) to improve quality patient care through early detection of declining health. However, there has been only partial provider participation since its inception, which potentially delays treatment and negatively impacts patient outcomes. The aim of this quality improvement project was to assess the feasibility of implementing a standardized electronic AWV template into private primary care practices to improve the consistency of delivery and documentation. The project designer utilized the theory of transitions (TOT) to facilitate the project execution. An electronic Excel-based template was designed to capture and calculate all aspects of the AWV, including billing codes, to allow for ease and consistency of use within a small primary care practice over two weeks. A provider performed the AWVs using the electronic template after completing a hands-on tutorial and reviewing an educational handout. Data were retrieved from a 7-question, 5-point Likert scale questionnaire given to the provider to assess the effectiveness of the electronic template versus a paper assessment. The results of this study indicated overall satisfaction with using leveraged technology to provide consistency of AWVs to improve patient outcomes, provider satisfaction, and increase revenue through uniform charting and billing. The outcomes of this project provide a basis of existing evidence for using standardized methods to perform and track Medicare AWVs.
Created2022-04-29
186392-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Background: An evidence-based project was performed to train and increase skills among healthcare providers to perform advance care planning. Training decreases barriers and improves attitudes and confidence to perform advance care planning. Advance care planning can include the Physician Order for Life-sustaining Treatment, an out-of-hospital order that directs emergency medical

Background: An evidence-based project was performed to train and increase skills among healthcare providers to perform advance care planning. Training decreases barriers and improves attitudes and confidence to perform advance care planning. Advance care planning can include the Physician Order for Life-sustaining Treatment, an out-of-hospital order that directs emergency medical services of a patient’s wishes. Internal evidence found that many providers are unfamiliar with the Physician Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment form. The Theory of Planned Behavior was used to guide the project. Objectives: To improve advanced care planning processes in a healthcare organization. Design: A quality improvement project was performed at a medical center with outpatient provider groups. Virtual training was provided by the Arizona Hospital and Healthcare Association on the Physician Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment. Participants completed a three-part survey to measure skills for advance care planning after a training event. Setting/Subjects: Five (n=5) American palliative and primary care providers at a medical center. Measurements: The East Midlands Evaluation Toolkit is a validated survey tool that measures confidence and competence in advance care planning after training. Results: Descriptive statistics, Friedman’s test, and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used for data analysis. Results provided evidence to the healthcare facility that there is a significant need to train their healthcare professionals on advance care planning. Conclusions: Recommendations are made to focus research on larger studies looking at the types of advance care planning, and differences in disciplines and specialties.
Created2022-04-29
186397-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a variety of infections caused by pathogens acquired and transmitted through sexual activity (World Health Organization [WHO], 2021). STIs are associated with an increase in chronic pelvic pain, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), infertility, and pregnancy complications (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2021e). A

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a variety of infections caused by pathogens acquired and transmitted through sexual activity (World Health Organization [WHO], 2021). STIs are associated with an increase in chronic pelvic pain, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), infertility, and pregnancy complications (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2021e). A clinical decision support (CDS) tool provides assistance to healthcare providers to use a logical, step-by-step method in patient management by incorporating different reminders or guidelines into practice. The purpose of this project is to assist healthcare providers to manage positive STI results per the CDC guidelines via a CDS tool. A CDS tool for positive STI management was implemented as a system wide practice change. A retrospective chart audit revealed the CDS tool was used 49% of the time. When the CDS tool was utilized, documented partner treatment, screening for additional STIs, documented follow-up, condoms offered, provider discussion of screening of other STIs, and treatment of the STI all increased. This project displays that utilization of a CDS tool can improve the management of positive STIs in a women’s healthcare setting.
Created2022-05-05
186420-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Primary care providers (PCPs) are frequently the first line of treatment for suicidal ideation (SI) patients. Many PCPs report low self-efficacy in treating suicidal patients, leading to inappropriate treatment plans or avoidance of discussing SI. This quality improvement project based on the Uncertainty Reduction theory aimed to evaluate PCP's perceptions

Primary care providers (PCPs) are frequently the first line of treatment for suicidal ideation (SI) patients. Many PCPs report low self-efficacy in treating suicidal patients, leading to inappropriate treatment plans or avoidance of discussing SI. This quality improvement project based on the Uncertainty Reduction theory aimed to evaluate PCP's perceptions of an SI treatment algorithm and its impact on self-efficacy. Secondary aims included assessing PCP's confidence in treating suicidal patients and current treatment practices. A pre- then post-intervention survey design was utilized. All PCPs treating patients in a military medicine clinic were invited to participate in the project. Participants were sent a recruitment email containing the suicidal ideation treatment algorithm and a link to a survey developed with Qualtrics software. Participants were asked to review the SI algorithm, answer the baseline survey questions, and complete a second eight-week survey. For human subjects' protection, the survey responses were anonymous. Demographic data collected included years of clinical experience and licensure type. The data were evaluated with Intellectus software. Due to limited participation, N=4, there was insufficient data to determine the significance of implementing the SI algorithm in a primary care clinic. Central tendencies showed that most providers (n=3, 75.00%) felt less than confident treating suicidal patients. Half of the providers asked non-mental health patients about suicide less than 40% of the time (n=2, 50.00%). The data suggest that PCPs feel uncomfortable treating suicidal patients and may benefit from additional resources and training in this area.
Created2022-04-26
162137-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Primary health care clinics are essential first defenders determined to confront the upsurge in health-related leading causes of death in the United States. Unfortunately, the underserved or uninsured community continues to struggle to access these vital health care services. Consequently, this vulnerable population seeks venues such as community services events

Primary health care clinics are essential first defenders determined to confront the upsurge in health-related leading causes of death in the United States. Unfortunately, the underserved or uninsured community continues to struggle to access these vital health care services. Consequently, this vulnerable population seeks venues such as community services events to obtain these unmet primary care services. Community services events effectively disseminate health-related material and provide access to vital medical services. Currently, community services strive to bridge the gap between underserved individuals and primary care clinics by providing participants referrals for low-fee or free clinics to establish ongoing care. A lack of data exists on whether these events sufficiently impact the participants to motivate them to follow-up with a health care clinic. A critical appraisal of evidence showed that follow-up adherence rates are remarkably improved by directly referring participants to a primary clinic during a community services event. This paper explores the effect on health outcomes and health disparities when establishing connections between community services participants and ongoing healthcare services.
Created2021-04-22
162139-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Objective: Pediatric patients with asthma are frequently cared for in the emergency department (ED). Many studies show early administration of corticosteroids (CS) can improve outcomes for children experiencing an asthma exacerbation. Despite the evidence, delays in care remain. The purpose of this study is to streamline the process for nurse-initiated,

Objective: Pediatric patients with asthma are frequently cared for in the emergency department (ED). Many studies show early administration of corticosteroids (CS) can improve outcomes for children experiencing an asthma exacerbation. Despite the evidence, delays in care remain. The purpose of this study is to streamline the process for nurse-initiated, triage-based CS administration and determine the effect on overall length of stay (LOS). Methods: For this quality improvement initiative, ED nurses at a large, freestanding, children’s emergency department in the southwestern United States were given education on inclusion and exclusion criteria for nurse-initiated CS in ED triage. Time to CS administration, LOS, and whether the ED nurse or provider ordered the CS were evaluated through chart reviews of patients presenting with a chief complaint of difficulty breathing. These metrics were compared to charts from the previous year during the same timeframe to evaluate for improved timeliness of CS delivery. Results: Time to CS administration decreased from a mean of 98.6 minutes to 57.6 minutes. LOS decreased from an average of 259.3 minutes to 169.6 minutes. The effect of timely CS on LOS was significant for December p =.003, January p =.002, and February p = <.001. Conclusion: A streamlined process for CS delivery to pediatric patients experiencing an asthma exacerbation can enable providers to achieve efficient and effective care in the ED and decrease a patient’s overall LOS.
Created2021-04-23
162154-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Background/Purpose: The prevalence of overweight and obesity in the pediatric population is a global epidemic. Rapid weight gain in early childhood exacerbates risk factors for obesity, chronic disease in adulthood, and disqualifies 31% of American youth from serving in the Armed Forces. Although the pediatric dependents weight crisis reflects the

Background/Purpose: The prevalence of overweight and obesity in the pediatric population is a global epidemic. Rapid weight gain in early childhood exacerbates risk factors for obesity, chronic disease in adulthood, and disqualifies 31% of American youth from serving in the Armed Forces. Although the pediatric dependents weight crisis reflects the national dilemma, there are inconsistencies in provider knowledge, limited access to evidence-based, weight management intervention, and treatment options. This paper will assess provider needs, identify opportunity to improve practice, and process used in weight management in the clinic. Method: Eight military and four civilian pediatric and family practice providers completed a 16-item needs assessment survey. The survey was distributed via email using an online survey tool, and a printed version was provided to those who had not completed it online. Data was collected over 8 weeks and a descriptive analysis of content was done using the Intellectus software. Results: Although the response rate was 88.9%, it was lower than anticipated due to COVID-19 related military deployments. Descriptive data were obtained on a variety of provider needs and practices. Results provided valuable information on current attitudes of providers. Providers demonstrated a significant need for a multidisciplinary support team including a dietician and more time dedicated to weight management at office visits. At least 50% of providers have had motivational interviewing training and report that they apply these techniques as part of an intervention in patient’s weight management care. Implication: Data supports overweight and obesity care practice changes in the clinic. Areas identified by providers included the need for further training and clinic management support including the availability of a pediatric dietician added to the healthcare team.
Created2021-04-27
162160-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Objective: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder is a pervasive neurodevelopmental disorder among children. Research has shown that young girls are underserved in diagnosing and treating ADHD or never diagnosed compared males. Utilizing the Health Promotion Model, this project aims to determine if primary care providers are aware of sex differences in

Objective: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder is a pervasive neurodevelopmental disorder among children. Research has shown that young girls are underserved in diagnosing and treating ADHD or never diagnosed compared males. Utilizing the Health Promotion Model, this project aims to determine if primary care providers are aware of sex differences in ADHD and if a brief education on sex differences in ADHD affects the primary care setting's screening rate. Design/Methods: With the Arizona institutional review Boards' approval, primary care providers (PCP) in a Southwest family practice in Arizona (n=35) are provided with virtual education on sex differences in ADHD. Pre- post-intervention surveys were electronically administered to five PCPS. Data were deidentified. A two-tailed paired t-test was conducted to examine the mean difference of responses. Results: Analysis of responses demonstrate that primary care providers are well aware of sex differences in ADHD but screened less for ADHD before the education intervention. Major themes emerged from provider comments on ADHD symptom recognition, time constraints, and increased screening to identify girls in the primary setting. A significant increase in ADHD screening is seen four weeks post-intervention t(4) = -6.32, p = .003. Conclusion: Future research is needed to identify other factors that could strengthen ADHD screening during well-child visits overall. Also, the use of a pediatric screener which can highlight inattentive symptoms would assist in the process of identifying girls with ADHD.
Created2021-04-27
162165-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Background: Type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a growing issue globally. Social determinants of health (SDH) play a crucial role on patients’ outcomes and complications from the disease. Hispanics are twice as likely to suffer from T2DM when compared to non-Hispanic whites, and they often rely on federally qualified community

Background: Type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a growing issue globally. Social determinants of health (SDH) play a crucial role on patients’ outcomes and complications from the disease. Hispanics are twice as likely to suffer from T2DM when compared to non-Hispanic whites, and they often rely on federally qualified community health centers (FQCHC) for their medical needs. These centers are then faced with high volume of patients with high acuity, which leads to limited time and resources to provide diabetic education. Methods: The Purnell model of cultural competence will be used as a framework to provide unbiased, culturally tailored (CT) education to improve patients’ outcomes. The advancing research and clinical practice through close collaboration (ARCC) model will be used as it focuses on evidence-based practice (EPB) implementation that is sustainable across the system. Purpose: The purpose of this EBP project is to promote culturally tailored (CT) DSME at a low-income FQCHC in greater Phoenix to improve diabetes outcomes and decrease complications from the disease. Consequently, decreasing the costly effects of diabetes complications to patients, FQCHC, and the state of Arizona. Conclusion: Evidence suggest that diabetes self-care management education (DSME) is successful, independent of the format of delivery, in improving diabetes outcomes and patients’ self-care. However, it is underutilized in the United States even though it is a covered Medicare service.
Created2021-04-28