Matching Items (11)
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Smartphones
- All Subjects: Threat Intelligence
- Creators: Ahn, Gail-Joon
Description
This thesis addresses the ever increasing threat of botnets in the smartphone domain and focuses on the Android platform and the botnets using Online Social Networks (OSNs) as Command and Control (C&C;) medium. With any botnet, C&C; is one of the components on which the survival of botnet depends. Individual bots use the C&C; channel to receive commands and send the data. This thesis develops active host based approach for identifying the presence of bot based on the anomalies in the usage patterns of the user before and after the bot is installed on the user smartphone and alerting the user to the presence of the bot. A profile is constructed for each user based on the regular web usage patterns (achieved by intercepting the http(s) traffic) and implementing machine learning techniques to continuously learn the user's behavior and changes in the behavior and all the while looking for any anomalies in the user behavior above a threshold which will cause the user to be notified of the anomalous traffic. A prototype bot which uses OSN s as C&C; channel is constructed and used for testing. Users are given smartphones(Nexus 4 and Galaxy Nexus) running Application proxy which intercepts http(s) traffic and relay it to a server which uses the traffic and constructs the model for a particular user and look for any signs of anomalies. This approach lays the groundwork for the future host-based counter measures for smartphone botnets using OSN s as C&C; channel.
ContributorsKilari, Vishnu Teja (Author) / Xue, Guoliang (Thesis advisor) / Ahn, Gail-Joon (Committee member) / Dasgupta, Partha (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2013
Description
The widespread adoption of mobile devices gives rise to new opportunities and challenges for authentication mechanisms. Many traditional authentication mechanisms become unsuitable for smart devices. For example, while password is widely used on computers as user identity authentication, inputting password on small smartphone screen is error-prone and not convenient. In the meantime, there are emerging demands for new types of authentication. Proximity authentication is an example, which is not needed for computers but quite necessary for smart devices. These challenges motivate me to study and develop novel authentication mechanisms specific for smart devices.
In this dissertation, I am interested in the special authentication demands of smart devices and about to satisfy the demands. First, I study how the features of smart devices affect user identity authentications. For identity authentication domain, I aim to design a continuous, forge-resistant authentication mechanism that does not interrupt user-device interactions. I propose a mechanism that authenticates user identity based on the user's finger movement patterns. Next, I study a smart-device-specific authentication, proximity authentication, which authenticates whether two devices are in close proximity. For prox- imity authentication domain, I aim to design a user-friendly authentication mechanism that can defend against relay attacks. In addition, I restrict the authenticated distance to the scale of near field, i.e., a few centimeters. My first design utilizes a user's coherent two-finger movement on smart device screen to restrict the distance. To achieve a fully-automated system, I explore acoustic communications and propose a novel near field authentication system.
In this dissertation, I am interested in the special authentication demands of smart devices and about to satisfy the demands. First, I study how the features of smart devices affect user identity authentications. For identity authentication domain, I aim to design a continuous, forge-resistant authentication mechanism that does not interrupt user-device interactions. I propose a mechanism that authenticates user identity based on the user's finger movement patterns. Next, I study a smart-device-specific authentication, proximity authentication, which authenticates whether two devices are in close proximity. For prox- imity authentication domain, I aim to design a user-friendly authentication mechanism that can defend against relay attacks. In addition, I restrict the authenticated distance to the scale of near field, i.e., a few centimeters. My first design utilizes a user's coherent two-finger movement on smart device screen to restrict the distance. To achieve a fully-automated system, I explore acoustic communications and propose a novel near field authentication system.
ContributorsLi, Lingjun (Author) / Xue, Guoliang (Thesis advisor) / Ahn, Gail-Joon (Committee member) / Ye, Jieping (Committee member) / Zhang, Yanchao (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2014
Description
This thesis proposed a novel approach to establish the trust model in a social network scenario based on users' emails. Email is one of the most important social connections nowadays. By analyzing email exchange activities among users, a social network trust model can be established to judge the trust rate between each two users. The whole trust checking process is divided into two steps: local checking and remote checking. Local checking directly contacts the email server to calculate the trust rate based on user's own email communication history. Remote checking is a distributed computing process to get help from user's social network friends and built the trust rate together. The email-based trust model is built upon a cloud computing framework called MobiCloud. Inside MobiCloud, each user occupies a virtual machine which can directly communicate with others. Based on this feature, the distributed trust model is implemented as a combination of local analysis and remote analysis in the cloud. Experiment results show that the trust evaluation model can give accurate trust rate even in a small scale social network which does not have lots of social connections. With this trust model, the security in both social network services and email communication could be improved.
ContributorsZhong, Yunji (Author) / Huang, Dijiang (Thesis advisor) / Dasgupta, Partha (Committee member) / Syrotiuk, Violet (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2011
Description
Reasoning about the activities of cyber threat actors is critical to defend against cyber
attacks. However, this task is difficult for a variety of reasons. In simple terms, it is difficult
to determine who the attacker is, what the desired goals are of the attacker, and how they will
carry out their attacks. These three questions essentially entail understanding the attacker’s
use of deception, the capabilities available, and the intent of launching the attack. These
three issues are highly inter-related. If an adversary can hide their intent, they can better
deceive a defender. If an adversary’s capabilities are not well understood, then determining
what their goals are becomes difficult as the defender is uncertain if they have the necessary
tools to accomplish them. However, the understanding of these aspects are also mutually
supportive. If we have a clear picture of capabilities, intent can better be deciphered. If we
understand intent and capabilities, a defender may be able to see through deception schemes.
In this dissertation, I present three pieces of work to tackle these questions to obtain
a better understanding of cyber threats. First, we introduce a new reasoning framework
to address deception. We evaluate the framework by building a dataset from DEFCON
capture-the-flag exercise to identify the person or group responsible for a cyber attack.
We demonstrate that the framework not only handles cases of deception but also provides
transparent decision making in identifying the threat actor. The second task uses a cognitive
learning model to determine the intent – goals of the threat actor on the target system.
The third task looks at understanding the capabilities of threat actors to target systems by
identifying at-risk systems from hacker discussions on darkweb websites. To achieve this
task we gather discussions from more than 300 darkweb websites relating to malicious
hacking.
attacks. However, this task is difficult for a variety of reasons. In simple terms, it is difficult
to determine who the attacker is, what the desired goals are of the attacker, and how they will
carry out their attacks. These three questions essentially entail understanding the attacker’s
use of deception, the capabilities available, and the intent of launching the attack. These
three issues are highly inter-related. If an adversary can hide their intent, they can better
deceive a defender. If an adversary’s capabilities are not well understood, then determining
what their goals are becomes difficult as the defender is uncertain if they have the necessary
tools to accomplish them. However, the understanding of these aspects are also mutually
supportive. If we have a clear picture of capabilities, intent can better be deciphered. If we
understand intent and capabilities, a defender may be able to see through deception schemes.
In this dissertation, I present three pieces of work to tackle these questions to obtain
a better understanding of cyber threats. First, we introduce a new reasoning framework
to address deception. We evaluate the framework by building a dataset from DEFCON
capture-the-flag exercise to identify the person or group responsible for a cyber attack.
We demonstrate that the framework not only handles cases of deception but also provides
transparent decision making in identifying the threat actor. The second task uses a cognitive
learning model to determine the intent – goals of the threat actor on the target system.
The third task looks at understanding the capabilities of threat actors to target systems by
identifying at-risk systems from hacker discussions on darkweb websites. To achieve this
task we gather discussions from more than 300 darkweb websites relating to malicious
hacking.
ContributorsNunes, Eric (Author) / Shakarian, Paulo (Thesis advisor) / Ahn, Gail-Joon (Committee member) / Baral, Chitta (Committee member) / Cooke, Nancy J. (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018
Description
Malware forensics is a time-consuming process that involves a significant amount of data collection. To ease the load on security analysts, many attempts have been made to automate the intelligence gathering process and provide a centralized search interface. Certain of these solutions map existing relations between threats and can discover new intelligence by identifying correlations in the data. However, such systems generally treat each unique malware sample as its own distinct threat. This fails to model the real malware landscape, in which so many ``new" samples are actually variants of samples that have already been discovered. Were there some way to reliably determine whether two malware samples belong to the same family, intelligence for one sample could be applied to any sample in the family, greatly reducing the complexity of intelligence synthesis. Clustering is a common big data approach for grouping data samples which have common features, and has been applied in several recent papers for identifying related malware. It therefore has the potential to be used as described to simplify the intelligence synthesis process. However, existing threat intelligence systems do not use malware clustering. In this paper, we attempt to design a highly accurate malware clustering system, with the ultimate goal of integrating it into a threat intelligence platform. Toward this end, we explore the many considerations of designing such a system: how to extract features to compare malware, and how to use these features for accurate clustering. We then create an experimental clustering system, and evaluate its effectiveness using two different clustering algorithms.
ContributorsSmith, Joshua Michael (Author) / Ahn, Gail-Joon (Thesis director) / Zhao, Ziming (Committee member) / School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences (Contributor) / Computer Science and Engineering Program (Contributor, Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2017-05
Description
This thesis project focused on malicious hacking community activities accessible through the I2P protocol. We visited 315 distinct I2P sites to identify those with malicious hacking content. We also wrote software to scrape and parse data from relevant I2P sites. The data was integrated into the CySIS databases for further analysis to contribute to the larger CySIS Lab Darkweb Cyber Threat Intelligence Mining research. We found that the I2P cryptonet was slow and had only a small amount of malicious hacking community activity. However, we also found evidence of a growing perception that Tor anonymity could be compromised. This work will contribute to understanding the malicious hacker community as some Tor users, seeking assured anonymity, transition to I2P.
ContributorsHutchins, James Keith (Author) / Shakarian, Paulo (Thesis director) / Ahn, Gail-Joon (Committee member) / Computer Science and Engineering Program (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2016-12
Description
On Android, existing security procedures require apps to request permissions for access to sensitive resources.
Only when the user approves the requested permissions will the app be installed.
However, permissions are an incomplete security mechanism.
In addition to a user's limited understanding of permissions, the mechanism does not account for the possibility that different permissions used together have the ability to be more dangerous than any single permission alone.
Even if users did understand the nature of an app's requested permissions, this mechanism is still not enough to guarantee that a user's information is protected.
Applications can potentially send or receive sensitive information from other applications without the required permissions by using intents.
In other words, applications can potentially collaborate in ways unforeseen by the user, even if the user understands the permissions of each app independently.
In this thesis, we present several graph-based approaches to address these issues.
We determine the permissions of an app and generate scores based on our assigned value of certain resources.
We analyze these scores overall, as well as in the context of the app's category as determined by Google Play.
We show that these scores can be used to identify overzealous apps, as well as apps that do not properly fit within their category.
We analyze potential interactions between different applications using intents, and identify several promiscuous apps with low permission scores, showing that permissions alone are not sufficient to evaluate the security risks of an app.
Our analyses can form the basis of a system to assist users in identifying apps that can potentially compromise user privacy.
Only when the user approves the requested permissions will the app be installed.
However, permissions are an incomplete security mechanism.
In addition to a user's limited understanding of permissions, the mechanism does not account for the possibility that different permissions used together have the ability to be more dangerous than any single permission alone.
Even if users did understand the nature of an app's requested permissions, this mechanism is still not enough to guarantee that a user's information is protected.
Applications can potentially send or receive sensitive information from other applications without the required permissions by using intents.
In other words, applications can potentially collaborate in ways unforeseen by the user, even if the user understands the permissions of each app independently.
In this thesis, we present several graph-based approaches to address these issues.
We determine the permissions of an app and generate scores based on our assigned value of certain resources.
We analyze these scores overall, as well as in the context of the app's category as determined by Google Play.
We show that these scores can be used to identify overzealous apps, as well as apps that do not properly fit within their category.
We analyze potential interactions between different applications using intents, and identify several promiscuous apps with low permission scores, showing that permissions alone are not sufficient to evaluate the security risks of an app.
Our analyses can form the basis of a system to assist users in identifying apps that can potentially compromise user privacy.
ContributorsGibson, Aaron (Author) / Bazzi, Rida (Thesis advisor) / Ahn, Gail-Joon (Committee member) / Walker, Erin (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015
Description
Smartphones are pervasive nowadays. They are supported by mobile platforms that allow users to download and run feature-rich mobile applications (apps). While mobile apps help users conveniently process personal data on mobile devices, they also pose security and privacy threats and put user's data at risk. Even though modern mobile platforms such as Android have integrated security mechanisms to protect users, most mechanisms do not easily adapt to user's security requirements and rapidly evolving threats. They either fail to provide sufficient intelligence for a user to make informed security decisions, or require great sophistication to configure the mechanisms for enforcing security decisions. These limitations lead to a situation where users are disadvantageous against emerging malware on modern mobile platforms. To remedy this situation, I propose automated and systematic approaches to address three security management tasks: monitoring, assessment, and confinement of mobile apps. In particular, monitoring apps helps a user observe and record apps' runtime behaviors as controlled under security mechanisms. Automated assessment distills intelligence from the observed behaviors and the security configurations of security mechanisms. The distilled intelligence further fuels enhanced confinement mechanisms that flexibly and accurately shape apps' behaviors. To demonstrate the feasibility of my approaches, I design and implement a suite of proof-of-concept prototypes that support the three tasks respectively.
ContributorsJing, Yiming (Author) / Ahn, Gail-Joon (Thesis advisor) / Doupe, Adam (Committee member) / Huang, Dijiang (Committee member) / Zhang, Yanchao (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015
Description
E-Mail header injection vulnerability is a class of vulnerability that can occur in web applications that use user input to construct e-mail messages. E-Mail injection is possible when the mailing script fails to check for the presence of e-mail headers in user input (either form fields or URL parameters). The vulnerability exists in the reference implementation of the built-in “mail” functionality in popular languages like PHP, Java, Python, and Ruby. With the proper injection string, this vulnerability can be exploited to inject additional headers and/or modify existing headers in an e-mail message, allowing an attacker to completely alter the content of the e-mail.
This thesis develops a scalable mechanism to automatically detect E-Mail Header Injection vulnerability and uses this mechanism to quantify the prevalence of E- Mail Header Injection vulnerabilities on the Internet. Using a black-box testing approach, the system crawled 21,675,680 URLs to find URLs which contained form fields. 6,794,917 such forms were found by the system, of which 1,132,157 forms contained e-mail fields. The system used this data feed to discern the forms that could be fuzzed with malicious payloads. Amongst the 934,016 forms tested, 52,724 forms were found to be injectable with more malicious payloads. The system tested 46,156 of these and was able to find 496 vulnerable URLs across 222 domains, which proves that the threat is widespread and deserves future research attention.
This thesis develops a scalable mechanism to automatically detect E-Mail Header Injection vulnerability and uses this mechanism to quantify the prevalence of E- Mail Header Injection vulnerabilities on the Internet. Using a black-box testing approach, the system crawled 21,675,680 URLs to find URLs which contained form fields. 6,794,917 such forms were found by the system, of which 1,132,157 forms contained e-mail fields. The system used this data feed to discern the forms that could be fuzzed with malicious payloads. Amongst the 934,016 forms tested, 52,724 forms were found to be injectable with more malicious payloads. The system tested 46,156 of these and was able to find 496 vulnerable URLs across 222 domains, which proves that the threat is widespread and deserves future research attention.
ContributorsChandramouli, Sai Prashanth (Author) / Doupe, Adam (Thesis advisor) / Ahn, Gail-Joon (Committee member) / Zhao, Ziming (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2016
Description
The volume and frequency of cyber attacks have exploded in recent years. Organizations subscribe to multiple threat intelligence feeds to increase their knowledge base and better equip their security teams with the latest information in threat intelligence domain. Though such subscriptions add intelligence and can help in taking more informed decisions, organizations have to put considerable efforts in facilitating and analyzing a large number of threat indicators. This problem worsens further, due to a large number of false positives and irrelevant events detected as threat indicators by existing threat feed sources. It is often neither practical nor cost-effective to analyze every single alert considering the staggering volume of indicators. The very reason motivates to solve the overcrowded threat indicators problem by prioritizing and filtering them.
To overcome above issue, I explain the necessity of determining how likely a reported indicator is malicious given the evidence and prioritizing it based on such determination. Confidence Score Measurement system (CSM) introduces the concept of confidence score, where it assigns a score of being malicious to a threat indicator based on the evaluation of different threat intelligence systems. An indicator propagates maliciousness to adjacent indicators based on relationship determined from behavior of an indicator. The propagation algorithm derives final confidence to determine overall maliciousness of the threat indicator. CSM can prioritize the indicators based on confidence score; however, an analyst may not be interested in the entire result set, so CSM narrows down the results based on the analyst-driven input. To this end, CSM introduces the concept of relevance score, where it combines the confidence score with analyst-driven search by applying full-text search techniques. It prioritizes the results based on relevance score to provide meaningful results to the analyst. The analysis shows the propagation algorithm of CSM linearly scales with larger datasets and achieves 92% accuracy in determining threat indicators. The evaluation of the result demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of the approach.
To overcome above issue, I explain the necessity of determining how likely a reported indicator is malicious given the evidence and prioritizing it based on such determination. Confidence Score Measurement system (CSM) introduces the concept of confidence score, where it assigns a score of being malicious to a threat indicator based on the evaluation of different threat intelligence systems. An indicator propagates maliciousness to adjacent indicators based on relationship determined from behavior of an indicator. The propagation algorithm derives final confidence to determine overall maliciousness of the threat indicator. CSM can prioritize the indicators based on confidence score; however, an analyst may not be interested in the entire result set, so CSM narrows down the results based on the analyst-driven input. To this end, CSM introduces the concept of relevance score, where it combines the confidence score with analyst-driven search by applying full-text search techniques. It prioritizes the results based on relevance score to provide meaningful results to the analyst. The analysis shows the propagation algorithm of CSM linearly scales with larger datasets and achieves 92% accuracy in determining threat indicators. The evaluation of the result demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of the approach.
ContributorsModi, Ajay (Author) / Ahn, Gail-Joon (Thesis advisor) / Zhao, Ziming (Committee member) / Doupe, Adam (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2017