The purpose of this study is to determine how Costa Rica supports human trafficking survivors, with a focus on the implementation of trauma-informed care within their efforts. This exploratory study examines services provided by one non-profit to human trafficking victims in Costa Rica and how their services reflect trauma-informed care practices. Research has shown that implementing a trauma-informed approach improves the quality of and receptiveness to care for individuals who have experienced trauma, including victims of human trafficking. For this thesis, qualitative-based field research was conducted in San Jose, Costa Rica. During the research process, interviews with service providers, legal professionals, and experts in the field were conducted. These interviews served to gather information on human trafficking in the country, victimization, services available for human trafficking survivors, trauma-informed care practices, and social/cultural, economic, legal, and Covid-19 related barriers that may prevent victims from seeking services or services from being provided in Costa Rica. A pre-determined set of interview questions was asked to each interviewee and this thesis is an analysis of the interview findings. This study was approved by the Arizona State University Institutional Review Board (see Appendix A). The findings indicate that Costa Rica is actively implementing trauma-informed care among the services provided to human trafficking survivors but can improve some of the practices in certain components of trauma-informed care to better enhance its implementation and thus benefit to clients and service providers.

Gen Z is very active on social media where there is a large amount of misinformation on human trafficking. This bears the question, does correct knowledge of human trafficking have a correlation with how Gen Z votes? This study looks into the correlation between Generation Z’s (Gen Z) voting patterns and their knowledge of human trafficking. The underlying thought is how media and social media play a role in what information Gen Z is taking to the voting booths. The results will show if both Republicans and Democrats or just one are affected by inadequate knowledge of human trafficking and if therefore, they are voting a specific way. A result emerged by surveying 30 people across the United States with ages ranging from 18-24, on where trafficking happens and to whom it happens to, alongside asking the participants different political questions to determine their voting patterns. The survey questions were written and analyzed quantitatively to use the data numerically as the results.

When major sporting events such as the Super Bowl occur, there is a perceived increase in the amount of sex trafficking that occurs in the host city of the event. This study sought to determine if there was a direct causal relationship between major sporting events and sex trafficking, or if the perceived spike in sex trafficking was due to increased scrutiny and attention sex trafficking receives during these events. Ultimately, after examining other studies and statistics, the conclusion was that while a direct causal relationship could not be determined between major sporting events and sex trafficking, there is a lucrative opportunity and higher risk for sex trafficking to occur at these major sporting events due to the risk factors associated with the event such as the high concentration of people in the area, the party atmosphere the event fosters, and the high amount of disposable income people at the event possess. This study also examined other aspects of sex trafficking such as the scope of the crime across the world, common characteristics among victims and offenders, and strategies used to combat the problem.