165565-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Student housing at American universities have been compared to prison cells in pop culture ad nauseum, but how far does this joke actually reflect reality? Most freshmen are required to live in student housing for their first year of college,

Student housing at American universities have been compared to prison cells in pop culture ad nauseum, but how far does this joke actually reflect reality? Most freshmen are required to live in student housing for their first year of college, yet these spaces are most notorious for having small windows, tightly packed beds, questionable food access, thin walls, and little ability for customization. Impacting the sight, touch, taste, sound, and speech of residents, respectively, these living conditions unavoidably impact the on-campus freshman experience in an integral way and deserve more intentionality of their design. The marketed purpose of offering housing and requiring on-campus living by universities is to ensure students are able to form a community and connect to campus as soon as they arrive. Yet, to what extent does this university-held goal to retain students fail when the goals of individual students do not have conditions in which to be successful? To what extent do the goals of the university actually hold students prisoner to a poorly designed system?
Reuse Permissions
  • 1.73 MB application/pdf

    Download restricted. Please sign in.
    Restrictions Statement

    Barrett Honors College theses and creative projects are restricted to ASU community members.

    Details

    Title
    • Analyzing the Influence of Sustainable Design on Student Success in On-Campus Housing
    Contributors
    Date Created
    2022-05
    Subjects
    Resource Type
  • Text
  • Machine-readable links