Description
Art and law have a troubled relationship that is defined by steep hierarchies placing art subject to law. But beyond the interplay of transgressions and regulations, manifest in a number of high-profile cases, there are more intricate connections between the

Art and law have a troubled relationship that is defined by steep hierarchies placing art subject to law. But beyond the interplay of transgressions and regulations, manifest in a number of high-profile cases, there are more intricate connections between the two disciplines. By expanding the notion of law into the concept of a hybrid collectif of legality, the hierarchies flatten and unfamiliar forms of possible interactions emerge. Legality, the quality of something being legal, serves as a model to show the capricious workings of law outside of its own profession. New juridical actors—such as algorithms—already challenge traditional regulatory powers and art could assume a similar role. This thesis offers a point of departure for the involvement of art in shaping emergent legalities that transcend existent jurisdictions through computer code.
Reuse Permissions
  • Downloads
    pdf (377.1 KB)

    Details

    Title
    • Art juridified: legality in contemporary art workings
    Contributors
    Date Created
    2018
    Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Note
    • Partial requirement for: M.A., Arizona State University, 2018
      Note type
      thesis
    • Includes bibliographical references (pages 52-57)
      Note type
      bibliography
    • Field of study: Art history

    Citation and reuse

    Statement of Responsibility

    by Christoph Schreiber

    Machine-readable links