Description

Neuroimaging has appeared in the courtroom as a type of `evidence' to support claims about whether or not criminals should be held accountable for their crimes. Yet the ability to abstract notions of culpability and criminal behavior with confidence from these imagines is unclear.

Reuse Permissions
  • Downloads
    pdf (429.8 KB)

    Download count: 0

    Details

    Contributors
    Date Created
    2014
    Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Note
    • Partial requirement for: M.S., Arizona State University, 2014
      Note type
      thesis
    • Includes bibliographical references (pages 54-56)
      Note type
      bibliography
    • Field of study: Criminology

    Citation and reuse

    Statement of Responsibility

    by Sarah Taddeo

    Machine-readable links