Description

ABSTRACT In Roosevelt v. Bishop (1994), Arizona public school districts and parents challenged Arizona's school financing system arguing that it was not "general and uniform" as required by the Arizona

ABSTRACT In Roosevelt v. Bishop (1994), Arizona public school districts and parents challenged Arizona's school financing system arguing that it was not "general and uniform" as required by the Arizona Constitution. The purpose of this study was to analyze Arizona's Students Fair and Immediate Resources for Students Today (Students FIRST) legislation, the remedy that resulted from the Roosevelt decision, empirically, and longitudinally. Three types of statistical analyses were conducted on a sample of 165 public school districts.

Reuse Permissions
  • 2.97 MB application/pdf

    Download count: 0

    Details

    Contributors
    Date Created
    • 2011
    Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Note
    • Partial requirement for: Ed. D., Arizona State University, 2011
      Note type
      thesis
    • Includes bibliographical references (p. 81-85)
      Note type
      bibliography
    • Field of study: Educational leadership and policy studies

    Citation and reuse

    Statement of Responsibility

    by Kenneth R. Baca

    Machine-readable links