Description
The knowledge of experts presumably affects their credibility and the degree to which the trier of fact will agree with them. However, specific effects of demonstrated knowledge are largely unknown. This experiment manipulated a forensic expert’s level of knowledge in a mock trial paradigm.
Copyright Statement
Download count: 0
Details
Contributors
- Parrott, Caroline Titcomb (Author)
- Neal, Tess M.S. (Author)
- Wilson, Jennifer K. (Author)
- Brodsky, Stanley L. (Author)
Date Created
The date the item was original created (prior to any relationship with the ASU Digital Repositories.)
2015-03
Resource Type
Collections this item is in
Identifier
- Digital object identifier: http://jaapl.org/content/43/1/69
Note
- This is a pre-print version of the paper available on the JAAPL website at http://www.jaapl.org/, opens in a new window. This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the journal. It is not the copy of record. © 2015 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
Citation and reuse
Cite this item
This is a suggested citation. Consult the appropriate style guide for specific citation guidelines.
Parrott, C.T., Neal, T.M.S., Wilson J.K., & Brodsky, S.L. (2015). Differences in expert witness knowledge: Do mock jurors notice and does it matter? Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 43, 69-81.