Description
There is substantial controversy over the extent to which social science should be used in jury selection. Underlying the debate are two competing interests in the make-up of a jury: a privilege to strike prospective jurors on subjective grounds, which supports scientific jury selection, and a collective interest of citizens to be free from exclusion from jury service, which does not.
Copyright Statement
Download count: 0
Details
Contributors
- Girvan, Erik J. (Author)
- Cramer, Robert J. (Author)
- Titcomb, Caroline (Author)
- Neal, Tess M.S. (Author)
- Brodsky, Stanley L. (Author)
Date Created
The date the item was original created (prior to any relationship with the ASU Digital Repositories.)
2013
Subjects
Resource Type
Collections this item is in
Citation and reuse
Cite this item
This is a suggested citation. Consult the appropriate style guide for specific citation guidelines.
Girvan, E., Cramer, R.J., Titcomb, C., Neal, T.M.S., & Brodsky, S.L. (2013). The propriety of preemptory challenges for perceived personality traits. Law & Psychology Review, 37, 49-82.