Description
The question as to whether the assessment of adaptive behavior (AB) for evaluations of intellectual disability (ID) in the community meet the level of rigor necessary for admissibility in legal cases is addressed. Adaptive behavior measures have made their way into the forensic domain where scientific evidence is put under great scrutiny.
Copyright Statement
Download count: 0
Details
Contributors
- Salekin, Karen L. (Author)
- Neal, Tess M.S. (Author)
- Hedge, Krystal A. (Author)
Date Created
The date the item was original created (prior to any relationship with the ASU Digital Repositories.)
2018-02-01
Resource Type
Collections this item is in
Identifier
- Digital object identifier: 10.1037/law0000150
Citation and reuse
Cite this item
This is a suggested citation. Consult the appropriate style guide for specific citation guidelines.
Salekin, K.L., Neal, T.M.S., & Hedge, K.A. (2018). Validity, inter-rater reliability, and measures of adaptive behavior: Concerns regarding the probative versus prejudicial value. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24, 24-35. doi: 10.1037/law0000150