Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Final Projects

Background: Neonatal hypoglycemia (NH) is a common problem in the newborn period that resolves by 24-48 hours of life. Infants with known NH risk factors take longer to achieve blood glucose homeostasis. The leading cause of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions in otherwise healthy term and late preterm infants is NH.

Purpose: To determine the efficacy of dextrose gel in addition to oral feedings in NH treatment as compared to the previous practice of oral feedings alone. Lewin's change theory was used in staff education and project implementation.

Methods/Search Strategy: A keyword search of CINHAL, Cochrane, and PubMed with restrictions to English and publications within 5 years revealed supportive data for the practice change. IRB approval obtained prior to the practice change. Nurses screened all newborns for NH risk factors at birth at a tertiary hospital in the southwestern U.S. Infants with specific criteria received oral dextrose gel with timed follow-up blood glucose levels following an NH algorithm.

Findings/Results: Two groups of infants with similar gestational ages, birth weights, and risk factors for NH were compared pre and post-implementation of the EBP change. Infants in the first group (n=27) were all born prior to the start of the project and therefore were all treated with IV dextrose in the NICU after failing to maintain blood glucose levels within normal ranges with oral feedings alone. The second group of infants (n=27) was treated based on an updated NH algorithm after implementation of the use of oral dextrose gel. Of those 27 infants, 24 received oral dextrose gel for NH treatment. Of respiratory distress in addition to NH so these infants were excluded in the statistical analysis of NICU admissions. Therefore the post-implementation group only had 2 admission for primary diagnosis of NH. When comparing admission rates for hypoglycemia between the two groups, the first group had a 100% admission rate while the second group (those who received oral dextrose gel) only had a 9% admission rate for neonatal hypoglycemia (p<0.001). Upon further investigation it was found that these 2 infants admitted to the NICU with the diagnosis of NH had multiple risk factors present, including being infants of diabetic mothers which means they likely experienced refractory hypoglycemia after treatment with oral dextrose gel secondary to hyperinsulinism. Hyperinsulinism can lead to persistent and profound hypoglycemia in the newborn that is more difficult to treat, which is of clinical significance.

Implications for Practice: Early identification with timely follow-up blood glucose levels following intervention may be critical to successful treatment without requiring NICU admission. Nursing education and parental support are also paramount to success. If the change in NICU admissions for NH is statistically significant with a larger sample size, results may be shared with other facilities that traditionally transfer these infants for a higher level of care.

Implications for Research: Studies with larger sample size may generate more generalizable data with fewer outliers. Studies comparing neurodevelopmental outcomes among infants who received different NH treatments are necessary to determine long-term safety.

Introduction: More than 1.2 million children in military families face long separations from a parent due to deployment or extended assignment, which can lead to significant family dysfunction as well as behavioral, emotional, and scholastic problems for the child. The purpose of From Caring 2 Coping is to identify and provide healthcare providers of military children tools to recognize and address maladaptive and externalizing behaviors of these children, while also assisting the nondeployed parent or caregiver to provide their children with the necessary support to reduce stress and increase their own coping skills.

Materials and Methods: After approval from Arizona State University IRB, children aged 4-11 years who are currently or forecasted to be separated from a military parent due to a deployment or extended assignment, were recruited from a military pediatric clinic along with their primary caregiver. An intervention was adapted from Bowen and Martin’s (2011) Resiliency Model of Role Performance for Service Members, Veterans, and their Families to identify and improve individual assets and family communication skills, find support through social connections, and prepare for potential stressors by constructing a Roadmap of Life. The Parental Stress Scale (PSS) and Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC-17) were completed before and after the 4-week intervention along with a final caregiver survey to evaluate the caregiver’s perceptions of From Caring 2 Coping.

Results: Four mothers and eight children completed the program for which Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test compared results from pre- and post PSC-17 surveys from the children showing significant improvement post-intervention (p = 0.017). The post PSC-17 results were compared to post PSS results with Spearman Correlation Coefficient, r = 0.949, that is statistically significant (p = 0.05). From Caring 2 Coping is rated as an effective program by parents in a postintervention survey that is easy to incorporate into daily activities. Parents ranked highest satisfaction through use of the Family Communication Plan and Family Timeline.

Conclusions: From Caring 2 Coping intervention tools improved family communication, use of individual assets and Roadmap of Life coping skills, thereby improving child and caregiver coping response as evidenced by improved PSC-17 and PSS scores. Basing the intervention on the Resiliency Model of Role Performance which has proven successful in the military population, improves the chances for success in this target population. However, the small sample size of four families requires further study with more families at all levels of the deployment cycle in order to refine the intervention.

Background: The cost of substance use (SU) in the United States (U.S.) is estimated at $1.25 trillion annually. SU is a worldwide health concern, impacting physical and psychological health of those who use substances, their friends, family members, communities and nations. Screening, Brief Intervention (BI) and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) provides an evidence-based (EB) framework to detect and treat SU. Evidence shows that mental health (MH) providers are not providing EB SU management. Federally grant-funded SBIRT demonstrated evidence of decreased SU and prevention of full disorders. Implementation outcomes in smaller-scale projects have included increased clinician knowledge, documentation and interdisciplinary teamwork.

Objective: To improve quality of care (QOC) for adolescents who use substances in the inpatient psychiatric setting by implementing EB SBIRT practices.

Methods: Research questions focused on whether the number of SBIRT notes documented (N=170 charts) increased and whether training of the interdisciplinary team (N=26 clinicians) increased SBIRT knowledge. Individualized interventions used existing processes, training and a new SBIRT Note template. An SBIRT knowledge survey was adapted from a similar study. A pre-and post-chart audit was conducted to show increase in SBIRT documentation. The rationale for the latter was not only for compliance, but also so that all team members can know the status of SBIRT services. Thus, increased interdisciplinary teamwork was an intentional, though indirect, outcome.

Results: A paired-samples t-test indicated clinician SBIRT knowledge significantly increased, with a large effect size. The results suggest that a short, 45-60-minute tailored education module can significantly increase clinician SBIRT knowledge. Auditing screening & BI notes both before and after the study period yielded important patient SU information and which types of SBIRT documentation increased post-implementation. The CRAFFT scores of the patients were quite high from a SU perspective, averaging over 3/6 both pre- and post-implementation, revealing over an 80% chance that the adolescent patient had a SU disorder. Most patients were positive for at least one substance (pre- = 47.1%; post- = 65.2%), with cannabis and alcohol being the most commonly used substances. Completed CRAFFT screenings increased from 62.5% to 72.7% of audited patients. Post-implementation, there were two types of BI notes: the preexisting Progress Note BI (PN BI) and the new Auto-Text BI (AT BI), part of the new SBIRT Note template introduced during implementation. The PN BIs not completed despite a positive screen increased from 79.6% to 83.7%. PN BIs increased 1%. The option for AT BI notes ameliorated this effect. Total BI notes completed for a patient positive for a substance increased from 20.4% to 32.6%, with 67.4% not receiving a documented BI. Total BIs completed for all patients was 21.2% post-implementation.

Conclusion: This project is scalable throughout the U.S. in MH settings and will provide crucial knowledge about positive and negative drivers in small-scale SBIRT implementations. The role of registered nurses (RNs), social workers and psychiatrists in providing SBIRT services as an interdisciplinary team will be enhanced. Likely conclusions are that short trainings can significantly increase clinician knowledge about SBIRT and compliance with standards. Consistent with prior evidence, significant management involvement, SBIRT champions, thought leaders and other consistent emphasis is necessary to continue improving SBIRT practice in the target setting.

Keywords: adolescents, teenagers, youth, alcohol, behavioral health, cannabis, crisis, documentation, drug use, epidemic, high-risk use, illicit drugs, implementation, mental health, opiates, opioid, pilot study, psychiatric inpatient hospital, quality improvement, SBIRT, Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment, substance use, unhealthy alcohol use, use disorders