Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Final Projects
The Doctor of Nursing Practice Final Projects collection contains the completed works of students from the DNP Program at Arizona State University's College of Nursing and Health Innovation. These projects are the culminating product of the curricula and demonstrate clinical scholarship.
Filtering by
- Creators: Chiffelle, Rochelle
- Creators: LaBronte, Kimberly
Background and Significance: CRC is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States among men and women. Current CRC screening rates remain low, even with advanced screening options available. Meaningful Use sets specific objectives for health care providers to achieve. Documenting CRC screening status and recommending CRC screenings to patients is one of the objectives of Meaningful Use and is considered a Clinical Quality Measure (HealthIT.gov). Factors that lead to CRC screening include primary care providers (PCPs) raising the topic, involving support staff, involving patients in the decision-making process, and setting alerts in electronic health records (EHRs).
Methods: The Health Belief Model and Ottawa Model of Research Use helped guide this project. The project took place at a private primary care practice. The focus was on patients between the ages of 50 and 75 years old meeting criteria for CRC. Five PCPS and five medical assistants (MAs) chose to participate in the study. Participants were given pre and post Practice Culture Assessment (PCA) surveys to measure perceptions of the practice culture. The project included a three-part practice change: PCP and MA education about CRC screening guidelines, EHR documentation and reminders, and a change of patient visit workflow which included having MAs review patient's CRC screening status before they were seen by the PCP and handing out CRC screening brochures when appropriate. PCPs then ordered the appropriate CRC screening, and the MA documented the screening in the EHR under a designated location. CRC Screening Project Evaluation Forms were completed by MAs after each patient visit.
Outcomes: No significant difference from pre to post survey satisfaction scores were found (t (8) = - 1.542, p= = .162). Means of quantitative data were reported from the CRC screening evaluation forms; N=91. The most common method of screening chosen was colonoscopy, 87%. A strong correlation was found (r (-.293) = .01, p<.05) between receiving a CRC brochure and choosing a form of screening. Meaningful Use scores pre and post project are pending.
Conclusion: Patients are more likely to choose a screening method when the topic is raised in a primary care setting. Continued staff education on workflow is important to sustain this change. Further research is needed to evaluate cost effectiveness and sustainability of this practice change.
Background: Neonatal hypoglycemia (NH) is a common problem in the newborn period that resolves by 24-48 hours of life. Infants with known NH risk factors take longer to achieve blood glucose homeostasis. The leading cause of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions in otherwise healthy term and late preterm infants is NH.
Purpose: To determine the efficacy of dextrose gel in addition to oral feedings in NH treatment as compared to the previous practice of oral feedings alone. Lewin's change theory was used in staff education and project implementation.
Methods/Search Strategy: A keyword search of CINHAL, Cochrane, and PubMed with restrictions to English and publications within 5 years revealed supportive data for the practice change. IRB approval obtained prior to the practice change. Nurses screened all newborns for NH risk factors at birth at a tertiary hospital in the southwestern U.S. Infants with specific criteria received oral dextrose gel with timed follow-up blood glucose levels following an NH algorithm.
Findings/Results: Two groups of infants with similar gestational ages, birth weights, and risk factors for NH were compared pre and post-implementation of the EBP change. Infants in the first group (n=27) were all born prior to the start of the project and therefore were all treated with IV dextrose in the NICU after failing to maintain blood glucose levels within normal ranges with oral feedings alone. The second group of infants (n=27) was treated based on an updated NH algorithm after implementation of the use of oral dextrose gel. Of those 27 infants, 24 received oral dextrose gel for NH treatment. Of respiratory distress in addition to NH so these infants were excluded in the statistical analysis of NICU admissions. Therefore the post-implementation group only had 2 admission for primary diagnosis of NH. When comparing admission rates for hypoglycemia between the two groups, the first group had a 100% admission rate while the second group (those who received oral dextrose gel) only had a 9% admission rate for neonatal hypoglycemia (p<0.001). Upon further investigation it was found that these 2 infants admitted to the NICU with the diagnosis of NH had multiple risk factors present, including being infants of diabetic mothers which means they likely experienced refractory hypoglycemia after treatment with oral dextrose gel secondary to hyperinsulinism. Hyperinsulinism can lead to persistent and profound hypoglycemia in the newborn that is more difficult to treat, which is of clinical significance.
Implications for Practice: Early identification with timely follow-up blood glucose levels following intervention may be critical to successful treatment without requiring NICU admission. Nursing education and parental support are also paramount to success. If the change in NICU admissions for NH is statistically significant with a larger sample size, results may be shared with other facilities that traditionally transfer these infants for a higher level of care.
Implications for Research: Studies with larger sample size may generate more generalizable data with fewer outliers. Studies comparing neurodevelopmental outcomes among infants who received different NH treatments are necessary to determine long-term safety.
Introduction: More than 1.2 million children in military families face long separations from a parent due to deployment or extended assignment, which can lead to significant family dysfunction as well as behavioral, emotional, and scholastic problems for the child. The purpose of From Caring 2 Coping is to identify and provide healthcare providers of military children tools to recognize and address maladaptive and externalizing behaviors of these children, while also assisting the nondeployed parent or caregiver to provide their children with the necessary support to reduce stress and increase their own coping skills.
Materials and Methods: After approval from Arizona State University IRB, children aged 4-11 years who are currently or forecasted to be separated from a military parent due to a deployment or extended assignment, were recruited from a military pediatric clinic along with their primary caregiver. An intervention was adapted from Bowen and Martin’s (2011) Resiliency Model of Role Performance for Service Members, Veterans, and their Families to identify and improve individual assets and family communication skills, find support through social connections, and prepare for potential stressors by constructing a Roadmap of Life. The Parental Stress Scale (PSS) and Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC-17) were completed before and after the 4-week intervention along with a final caregiver survey to evaluate the caregiver’s perceptions of From Caring 2 Coping.
Results: Four mothers and eight children completed the program for which Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test compared results from pre- and post PSC-17 surveys from the children showing significant improvement post-intervention (p = 0.017). The post PSC-17 results were compared to post PSS results with Spearman Correlation Coefficient, r = 0.949, that is statistically significant (p = 0.05). From Caring 2 Coping is rated as an effective program by parents in a postintervention survey that is easy to incorporate into daily activities. Parents ranked highest satisfaction through use of the Family Communication Plan and Family Timeline.
Conclusions: From Caring 2 Coping intervention tools improved family communication, use of individual assets and Roadmap of Life coping skills, thereby improving child and caregiver coping response as evidenced by improved PSC-17 and PSS scores. Basing the intervention on the Resiliency Model of Role Performance which has proven successful in the military population, improves the chances for success in this target population. However, the small sample size of four families requires further study with more families at all levels of the deployment cycle in order to refine the intervention.