Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Final Projects
The Doctor of Nursing Practice Final Projects collection contains the completed works of students from the DNP Program at Arizona State University's College of Nursing and Health Innovation. These projects are the culminating product of the curricula and demonstrate clinical scholarship.
Filtering by
- Creators: Chiffelle, Rochelle
- Creators: Cox, Karen N.
Background and Significance: CRC is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States among men and women. Current CRC screening rates remain low, even with advanced screening options available. Meaningful Use sets specific objectives for health care providers to achieve. Documenting CRC screening status and recommending CRC screenings to patients is one of the objectives of Meaningful Use and is considered a Clinical Quality Measure (HealthIT.gov). Factors that lead to CRC screening include primary care providers (PCPs) raising the topic, involving support staff, involving patients in the decision-making process, and setting alerts in electronic health records (EHRs).
Methods: The Health Belief Model and Ottawa Model of Research Use helped guide this project. The project took place at a private primary care practice. The focus was on patients between the ages of 50 and 75 years old meeting criteria for CRC. Five PCPS and five medical assistants (MAs) chose to participate in the study. Participants were given pre and post Practice Culture Assessment (PCA) surveys to measure perceptions of the practice culture. The project included a three-part practice change: PCP and MA education about CRC screening guidelines, EHR documentation and reminders, and a change of patient visit workflow which included having MAs review patient's CRC screening status before they were seen by the PCP and handing out CRC screening brochures when appropriate. PCPs then ordered the appropriate CRC screening, and the MA documented the screening in the EHR under a designated location. CRC Screening Project Evaluation Forms were completed by MAs after each patient visit.
Outcomes: No significant difference from pre to post survey satisfaction scores were found (t (8) = - 1.542, p= = .162). Means of quantitative data were reported from the CRC screening evaluation forms; N=91. The most common method of screening chosen was colonoscopy, 87%. A strong correlation was found (r (-.293) = .01, p<.05) between receiving a CRC brochure and choosing a form of screening. Meaningful Use scores pre and post project are pending.
Conclusion: Patients are more likely to choose a screening method when the topic is raised in a primary care setting. Continued staff education on workflow is important to sustain this change. Further research is needed to evaluate cost effectiveness and sustainability of this practice change.
Oral health in the pediatric population is an overlooked topic in primary care, yet it is vital to their overall health. Dental caries, otherwise known as cavities, are a significant problem among the pediatric population. Dental caries is the most common non-transmittable disease across the globe. Dental caries can have painful effects that can lead to serious health implications and reduce the quality of life. Prevention is key when addressing dental caries and oral health care. Oral health prevention and education should begin early on in life and continue throughout the lifetime.
Pediatricians and primary care practitioners play a vital role in the prevention identification, and treatment of dental caries. Individuals in these care roles must become familiar with dental caries and the best evidence-based practices. Furthermore, these health care providers can have an active role in policy creation and change within the community to address the issue. A project was conducted to help improve oral health in the pediatric population. The project consisted of a well-child template modification at the 9-month well-child visit that would prompt providers to encourage a dental visit by the 12-month appointment. The results were limited, and the outcomes were not statistically significant. A recommendation for future studies will be to verbalize the recommendation and provide a handout or recommend a specific pediatric dentist.