The Doctor of Nursing Practice Final Projects collection contains the completed works of students from the DNP Program at Arizona State University's College of Nursing and Health Innovation. These projects are the culminating product of the curricula and demonstrate clinical scholarship.

Collaborating Institutions:
College of Nursing and Health Innovation
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
Filtering by

Clear all filters

186386-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Objective: To understand and prevent adverse discharge events, the project assesses the needs and gaps of discharge care coordination for child(ren) with medical complexities (CMC). The National Survey of Children’s Health show 87.4% of CMC does not receive care in a well-functioning system, and 47.4% did not receive adequate care

Objective: To understand and prevent adverse discharge events, the project assesses the needs and gaps of discharge care coordination for child(ren) with medical complexities (CMC). The National Survey of Children’s Health show 87.4% of CMC does not receive care in a well-functioning system, and 47.4% did not receive adequate care coordination 1. Therefore, does initiating measurement tools and communication before and after discharge identify and prevent discharge related adverse events? Methods: After IRB approval, a mixed-methods approach project occurred at southwestern pediatric free-standing hospital. Through eight weeks of convenience sampling, CMC caregivers were recruited in the inpatient setting (n=5). Qualitative and quantitative data were obtained through: [Pediatric] Care Transitions Measurement Tool – 15 (CTM- 15), with a Cronbach’s alpha of .932; a demographics survey; a post-discharge survey; and electronic health records. Results: The CTM-15 post-discharge score was 83.3 (N = 4, SD = 9.83, SE¬M = 4.92). CTM-15 qualitative data included: communication issues; rushed discharge; poor discharge anticipatory guidance; hospital policy concerns; follow-up appointment issues; and prescription errors. LOS average for all participants was 137.8 days (SD = 102.75, SEM = 45.95) with 40 unintended hospital days (SD = 41.55, SEM = 18.51). Issues encountered 30 days post-discharge included: prescription errors, follow-up issues, and home health issues. Conclusion: Hospitalized CMC have an increased risk to encounter a discharge adverse event because of a complex intertwining of disciplines, services, medications, and needs. Communication, tools, and surveys did not capture all the problems encountered by families with CMC; however, it did identify areas of notable concern.
Created2022-05-02
162178-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
The landscape of healthcare is changing. All health providers in varying disciplines and roles must collaborate and function in teams for effective patient and care outcomes to take place. Collaborative practice starts in the academic environment through adoption of Interprofessional Education (IPE). Fostering IPE increases learner confidence and communication but

The landscape of healthcare is changing. All health providers in varying disciplines and roles must collaborate and function in teams for effective patient and care outcomes to take place. Collaborative practice starts in the academic environment through adoption of Interprofessional Education (IPE). Fostering IPE increases learner confidence and communication but requires a team-based approach to eliminate known learner barriers. These barriers include attitude toward collaboration, role delineation, team development and patient delivery and outcome. While IPE opportunities and activities can be looked at as unique, developing structured curricular standards can be applied to all IPE experiences. Healthcare Participants (HCP’s) (N=15) from two organizational settings participated in an online IPE experience using best practice IPE interventions and structured design formatting focusing on older adults. The course consisted of an online pre learning activity followed by one online session to work as teams on case studies alongside mentorship guidance. The previously validated and reliable ICCAS and RIPLS survey tools were used to measure outcomes of readiness for IPE and professional development. Though no statistically significant changes were noted on the dependent variables, there was clinical significance found in professional development.
Created2021-05-03