Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Final Projects
The Doctor of Nursing Practice Final Projects collection contains the completed works of students from the DNP Program at Arizona State University's College of Nursing and Health Innovation. These projects are the culminating product of the curricula and demonstrate clinical scholarship.
Collaborating Institutions:
College of Nursing and Health Innovation
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
Filtering by
- Creators: Bonefield, Brittany A.
- Creators: Corcoran, Abigail T.
Description
Sedation exists along a continuum; and, it is impossible to predict a patient’s exact response to a medication administered to induce any level sedation. Under the direction of a licensed independent practitioner (LIP), registered nurses (RN) in the Emergency Department (ED) have been permitted to administer propofol for time-sensitive, moderate sedation procedures (e.g. orthopedic reductions). In 2019, this changed when a Board of Nursing (BON) in the Southwestern United States posted an Advisory Opinion (AO) limiting the circumstances under which acute care RNs could administer propofol. The purpose of this doctoral project was to revise the 2019 AO to remove specific medication names and to generate recommendations for aligning hospital-based adult sedation policies and procedures (P&P) with the revised AO. In May 2020, the BON enacted the revised AO. Enactment endorses RNs practicing at the top of their scope and justifies amending existing hospital-based sedation P&Ps. Not restricting nurses’ scope of practice according to medication name supports medication selection based on patient condition and clinical situation and safeguards provision of timely, personalized healthcare to communities statewide.
ContributorsBonefield, Brittany A. (Author) / Tharalson, Erin (Thesis advisor) / Arizona State University. College of Nursing & Healthcare Innovation (Contributor)
Created2021-04-18
Description
Capturing and presenting high-quality data can be challenging for free clinics due to lack of resources and technology avoidance. If free clinics are unable to present impactful data to current and potential donors, this may limit funding and restrict care provided to underserved and vulnerable populations. The following is a quality improvement project which addresses utilization of information systems within a free clinic. For one month, volunteer providers completed appointment summary forms for each patient seen in the clinic. Electronic form submissions (E=110) were compared to paper form submissions (P=196), with quality of data determined by form completeness scores. Welch’s t-test was used to determine statistical significance between electronic and paper form completeness scores (E=9.7, P=8.5) (p < .001). Findings suggest that utilization of electronic data collection tools within a free clinic produce more complete and accurate data. Barriers associated with technology utilization in this under-resourced environment were substantial. Findings related to overcoming some of these barriers may be useful for future exploration of health information technology utilization in under-resourced and technology avoidant settings. Results warrant future investigation of the relationship between quality of free clinic data, information management systems, provider willingness to utilize technology and funding opportunities in free clinics.
ContributorsCorcoran, Abigail T. (Author) / Thrall, Charlotte (Thesis advisor) / Arizona State University. College of Nursing & Healthcare Innovation (Contributor)
Created2021-04-24