Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Final Projects

Purpose: Assess provider perceptions on care coordination, collaboration, teamwork, and shared decision-making practices pre and post a brief educational intervention on interprofessional collaboration (IPC).

Background and significance: A lack of care coordination and active follow up in the outpatient setting of individuals living with mental illness places this population at high risk for developing various comorbidities. Care coordination across care providers and patients in a IPC, patient-centered treatment model of care is an intervention that can reduce this barrier to care.

Methods: At a behavioral health clinic in the southwestern United States (U.S.) twenty-two participants were assessed via the Collaborative Practice Assessment Tool (CPAT), before and after an educational presentation on IPC care. The CPAT is a tool that was developed to assess collaborative practice within teams and help identify needs for professional development.

Results: Statistical significance was found from pretest to posttest scores (t(21) = -1.936, p = .066). Statistical significance was found in two of the eight domains; mission, meaningful purpose, and goals (p = .009) and decision-making and conflict management (p = .058). Increases in posttest scores were seen in all eight domains.

Conclusions: Training behavioral health professionals in IPC practice and teambuilding may facilitate improved clinical team experiences and communication. Behavioral health professionals treating individuals living with serious mental illness (SMI), IPC training could prepare providers to work more effectively and efficiently in the delivery of patient-centered care in this population with complex health care needs.

There is an increasing number of cancer patients outliving their diagnosis and treatment and requiring more support as they transition to cancer survivors. To bridge this gap, survivorship care plans should be provided to all cancer survivors to provide post treatment plans of care, recommendations, and resources (Commission on Cancer, 2016). A quality improvement project was implemented in the urology practice of a National Cancer Institute-designated, academic hospital in Phoenix, Arizona to provide survivorship care plans to prostate cancer patients with surgical intervention as their cancer treatment.

Through interprofessional collaboration, the process change was designed and implemented with the residents and Physician Assistants of the urology practice. There was a 93% adherence rate in delivering the survivorship care plans during the project. The “Confidence in Survivorship Information” questionnaire was used to measure the patients’ confidence in survivorship information prior to and after receiving a survivorship care plan. A paired t-test showed statistical significance in improvement in confidence in the knowledge of long-term physical effects of cancer treatment, strategies for preventing and treating long-term physical effects, and resources available for family members who may be at risk. The project will continue in order to meet requirements for cancer programs established by the Commission on Cancer (Commission on Cancer, 2016).

Cancer survivors meet survivorship with uncertainty due to a lack of uniform information provided post cancer treatment. The implementation of survivorship care plans (SCP) has been recognized by key stakeholders as the solution to transitional uncertainties. In fact, to achieve accreditation by the Commission on Cancer (CoC) cancer centers are required to deliver SCPs to cancer survivors within a year of their treatment completion. Research demonstrates SCP delivery results in significant improvement in patient satisfaction, coordination of care, and survivorship care knowledge.

In order to meet CoC standard 3.3 and bring understanding to SCPs function in cancer survivorship care a quality improvement project was initiated within an Arizona cancer center. SCPs were delivered at a survivorship visit to adult breast cancer patients. SCPs affect on survivors’ confidence in cancer self-care knowledge and care satisfaction was evaluated as well as the organization’s adherence to CoC standard 3.3 requirements. Identified survivors were scheduled for a survivorship visit where a SCP was delivered by a oncology provider.

Survivors perceived confidence in knowledge and satisfaction was measured using the modified 16-item Confidence in Survivorship Information Questionnaire (CSI). Questionnaires were completed pre and post survivorship visit. A paired t-test analysis was used to evaluate SCP effectiveness. There was an increase in the delivery of SCPs from zero to 57 with an 84 percent SCP delivery from August 2017 to January 2018. Survivors and providers verbalize value in SCPs.

No statistical significance was found in the comparison of SCPs affect on survivors’ confidence in cancer self-care knowledge and care satisfaction to that of standard follow-up care; however, when comparing the pre/post questionnaire averages an improvement was noted across the board.The prospect of this project is to unveil the impact SCP delivery at a survivorship visit has on the selected metrics. This project aids as a director for organization wide implementation for CoC standard 3.3 requirement compliance.

Cancer survivorship has been identified as separate stage in cancer treatment posing unique issues that arise from the diagnosis of cancer, as well as late effects associated with treatments. Evidence shows that cancer survivors demonstrate suboptimal follow-up care, and report high levels of unmet needs related to their cancer experience. To improve care for the increasing number of cancer survivors in the United States, survivorship care plans (SCPs) have been proposed as way to strengthen care coordination and improve patient outcomes.

Research suggests that SCPs have favorable impact on patient satisfaction and quality of life, however little research to date investigates the utility of SCPs in improving patient outcomes, adherence to follow-up recommendations, or patients’ confidence in self-care management. To further understand the role of SCPs in survivorship care, a pilot implementation of SCPs in colon cancer patients was implemented to gather data on the identified gaps.

The health care industry increasingly recognizes interprofessional collaboration (IPC) as the key to optimizing delivery of care, and interprofessional education (IPE) has been the foundational method for building IPC. When IPC is examined, leadership skills of the practitioners are often seen as a positive force for optimizing team performance. This project aimed to deliver an education session sharing interprofessional leadership (IPL) competencies and the effect they may have on attitudes toward IPC. A pilot was designed for a single site, a student run clinic in a large city in the Southwest United States, which serves as a learning laboratory to help future health practitioners grow IPC skills through effective and innovative IPE. A search of the available evidence supporting this project revealed that educational activities delivered to practitioners can build the leadership skills seen in effective IPC.

During the Fall 2017 semester, the education sessions were delivered to student practitioners at the clinic during their semester-long rotation. The University of the West of England Interprofessional Questionnaire, designed to measure self-assessment of attitudes toward collaborative learning and collaborative working, was deployed at the beginning and end of a semester-long rotation to all students working at the clinic to look for changes. A low sample size limited results to assessment of clinical significance, but showed some changes that could be significant if the project continues. Clinically significant changes show an increase in students’ rating of their own skills and preferences toward interprofessional practice. In keeping with the learning laboratory model at the clinic, these outcomes support continued delivery and examination of the education model with subsequent clinic rotations to strengthen the conclusions being drawn from the results.