Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Final Projects
The Doctor of Nursing Practice Final Projects collection contains the completed works of students from the DNP Program at Arizona State University's College of Nursing and Health Innovation. These projects are the culminating product of the curricula and demonstrate clinical scholarship.
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Human trafficking
- All Subjects: Peer Group
- All Subjects: Survivorship
There is an increasing number of cancer patients outliving their diagnosis and treatment and requiring more support as they transition to cancer survivors. To bridge this gap, survivorship care plans should be provided to all cancer survivors to provide post treatment plans of care, recommendations, and resources (Commission on Cancer, 2016). A quality improvement project was implemented in the urology practice of a National Cancer Institute-designated, academic hospital in Phoenix, Arizona to provide survivorship care plans to prostate cancer patients with surgical intervention as their cancer treatment.
Through interprofessional collaboration, the process change was designed and implemented with the residents and Physician Assistants of the urology practice. There was a 93% adherence rate in delivering the survivorship care plans during the project. The “Confidence in Survivorship Information” questionnaire was used to measure the patients’ confidence in survivorship information prior to and after receiving a survivorship care plan. A paired t-test showed statistical significance in improvement in confidence in the knowledge of long-term physical effects of cancer treatment, strategies for preventing and treating long-term physical effects, and resources available for family members who may be at risk. The project will continue in order to meet requirements for cancer programs established by the Commission on Cancer (Commission on Cancer, 2016).
Cancer survivors meet survivorship with uncertainty due to a lack of uniform information provided post cancer treatment. The implementation of survivorship care plans (SCP) has been recognized by key stakeholders as the solution to transitional uncertainties. In fact, to achieve accreditation by the Commission on Cancer (CoC) cancer centers are required to deliver SCPs to cancer survivors within a year of their treatment completion. Research demonstrates SCP delivery results in significant improvement in patient satisfaction, coordination of care, and survivorship care knowledge.
In order to meet CoC standard 3.3 and bring understanding to SCPs function in cancer survivorship care a quality improvement project was initiated within an Arizona cancer center. SCPs were delivered at a survivorship visit to adult breast cancer patients. SCPs affect on survivors’ confidence in cancer self-care knowledge and care satisfaction was evaluated as well as the organization’s adherence to CoC standard 3.3 requirements. Identified survivors were scheduled for a survivorship visit where a SCP was delivered by a oncology provider.
Survivors perceived confidence in knowledge and satisfaction was measured using the modified 16-item Confidence in Survivorship Information Questionnaire (CSI). Questionnaires were completed pre and post survivorship visit. A paired t-test analysis was used to evaluate SCP effectiveness. There was an increase in the delivery of SCPs from zero to 57 with an 84 percent SCP delivery from August 2017 to January 2018. Survivors and providers verbalize value in SCPs.
No statistical significance was found in the comparison of SCPs affect on survivors’ confidence in cancer self-care knowledge and care satisfaction to that of standard follow-up care; however, when comparing the pre/post questionnaire averages an improvement was noted across the board.The prospect of this project is to unveil the impact SCP delivery at a survivorship visit has on the selected metrics. This project aids as a director for organization wide implementation for CoC standard 3.3 requirement compliance.
Cancer survivorship has been identified as separate stage in cancer treatment posing unique issues that arise from the diagnosis of cancer, as well as late effects associated with treatments. Evidence shows that cancer survivors demonstrate suboptimal follow-up care, and report high levels of unmet needs related to their cancer experience. To improve care for the increasing number of cancer survivors in the United States, survivorship care plans (SCPs) have been proposed as way to strengthen care coordination and improve patient outcomes.
Research suggests that SCPs have favorable impact on patient satisfaction and quality of life, however little research to date investigates the utility of SCPs in improving patient outcomes, adherence to follow-up recommendations, or patients’ confidence in self-care management. To further understand the role of SCPs in survivorship care, a pilot implementation of SCPs in colon cancer patients was implemented to gather data on the identified gaps.
Purpose: The purpose of this project was to examine if a relationship existed between the changes in attitude and knowledge of a mental health care provider, before and after an educational intervention was given on how to identify sex trafficking victims.
Background: According to the National Trafficking Hotline (2017), last year there were over 5,000 cases of sex trafficking reported. Lederer & Wetzel (2014) discuss that more than 88% of victims interact with a health care provider while being trafficked at least once. A majority of cases, mental health care providers were informed that their patient was a sex trafficking victim through collaboration of other services. Without this collaboration, many providers would have never
known that they had interacted with a victim (Domoney, Howard, Abas, Broadben, & Oram, 2015).
Methods: The participant population consisted of psychiatrists, psychiatric nurse practitioners and psychologists working in acute and out patient settings.
A pre survey was given to identify the participant’s knowledge of sex trafficking and their awareness of available resources and tools to help screen as well as treat victims of sex trafficking. After completion, the participants viewed an educational voice over presentation that educated them on how to identify current sex trafficking victims, what screening tools are available, the mental health risk factors and how to protect both the victim and provider from potential danger from the alleged trafficker. A post survey was then given to assess their knowledge after the presentation intervention, how much they retained and their confidence in being able to assess and treat sex trafficking victims. All surveys and the presentation were available online for participant convenience via a private link.
Results: The knowledge posttest score was higher than the pretest (Z=-2.694, p<0.007).
The confidence score on treating sex trafficking victims was higher posttest (Z=-2.251, p<0.024) No significant change in attitudes for advocating for sex trafficking victim care. All providers agreed that this high-risk vulnerable population needs advocates (Z=4.67, p<0.707).
Conclusion: All providers agreed for the need to advocate for victim care prior to the educational intervention. The results suggest that mental health providers are more knowledgeable posttest about risk factors, have a higher level of confidence in treating sex trafficking victims and have a higher confidence in their ability to protect victims and provide adequate care.