Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Final Projects
The Doctor of Nursing Practice Final Projects collection contains the completed works of students from the DNP Program at Arizona State University's College of Nursing and Health Innovation. These projects are the culminating product of the curricula and demonstrate clinical scholarship.
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Human Papilloma Virus
- All Subjects: Drowning
The human papillomavirus (HPV) is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that is associated with several types of cancer and genital warts. No cure exists for those currently infected with HPV, but a vaccine is available that can prevent the virus and development of cancers associated with HPV. Military servicemembers are at a high risk for contracting HPV; it is one of the most common STIs among active duty service members. The health consequences of HPV can impact a servicemember’s military readiness. The HPV vaccine is not required for military servicemembers, but it is offered free of charge. HPV vaccination rates among military service members remain relatively low.
The purpose of this evidence-based project was to increase the level of knowledge about HPV, improve health beliefs regarding HPV, increase HPV vaccine intention, recommendation, and uptake. Using the Health Belief Model as an organizing framework, a population targeted eight-minute education video on HPV and HPV vaccination was developed. It was implemented at an outpatient military treatment facility located in the southwest United States over a 6-week period, to newly reported service members. Participants included 116 military service members aged 18 to 45. A pretest and posttest questionnaire were used to assess the impact of the intervention. HPV level of knowledge increased significantly from pretest to posttest mean scores were 3.00 to 4.39 respectively (p < .001). HPV vaccine intention increased from 62% to 66% (p = .739). HPV vaccine recommendation increased from 62% to 85% (p < .001).
The human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most commonly spread sexually transmitted infection in the United States. Although the HPV vaccine protects against transmission of the most common strains of HPV that cause genital warts and numerous urogenital cancers, uptake in the United States remains suboptimal. Failure to vaccinate leaves individuals vulnerable to the virus and subsequent complications of transmission. The evidence demonstrates that provider recommendation alone increases rates of vaccine uptake. The literature does not suggest a specific method for provider recommendation delivery; however, best practice alerts (BPAs) were correlated with increased vaccination rates.
These findings have directed a proposed project that includes an electronic health record (EHR) change prompting internal medicine, family practice and women’s health providers to educate and recommend the HPV vaccine at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in the Southwest United States. The project demonstrates that after the implementation of a practice change of a HPV BPA in the EHR, HPV vaccination rates increased. Practice settings pre and post were similar, making the increase clinically significant.
The strengths of this project include an increase in HPV vaccination rates, a sustainable intervention, and an intervention that can easily be replicated into other health maintenance tasks. There were some limitations including the BPA alert only catching the HPV 9 vaccine series and the BPA did not always capturing historical data. Despite these technical barriers the HPV BPA delivered an increase in the HPV vaccine to protect more individuals from the HPV virus, increased provider adherence to national guidelines, and provides a platform for BPAs to be utilized for other vaccines.
Background and Significance: Drownings are the leading cause of death in one to four year old children in the United States. Arizona’s drowning rate is nearly double the national average for this age group. Water safety is an important anticipatory guidance topic a primary care provider should be discussing at all well visits. The Health Belief Model is an effective framework to guide family education interventions. It is strongly encouraged that providers incorporate water safety education into the developmental milestone discussions.
Methods: Ten providers recruited from six Arizona pediatric primary care clinics participated in an educational one-hour session. Providers were encouraged to prioritize water safety discussions within the one to four year old age group and deliver education in the context of individual child development. Additionally, providers were updated on water safety recommendations from the Center for Family Health and Safety at Phoenix Children’s Hospital. Supplemental handouts with developmental water safety information were given to each office to aid providers in parent education. A pre-survey was administered to the providers prior to the education session and a post-survey was given at an eight-week follow up. The surveys measured provider perception and current practices of water safety education and utilized a Likert scale to compare data sets. Current and retrospective chart reviews were conducted to evaluate sustainability of the educational intervention.
Outcomes/Results: Sixty percent of provider participants were Medical Doctors (MD) and 40% were Nurse Practitioners (NP) with experience ranging from one year to over 20 years. Following the education session, providers were more likely to discuss keeping a child at arms-reach at all times (p=0.046) during their well visits. There was also an increase in providers incorporating water safety discussions into milestone education (p=0.054).
Conclusion: This educational intervention empowered providers to deliver water safety education in the context of normal developmental milestones at each one to four year old well visit. The anticipatory guidance emphasizes to parents that the behaviors their children exhibit are healthy and normal, but also explains how achieving these milestones put their children at greater risk for drownings. This quality improvement project is part of a larger initiative to decrease the number of drownings in Arizona through education and policy
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a prevalent sexually transmitted infection that affects many adolescents and adults worldwide. The consequences of contracting HPV have proven to be devastating, potentially leading to a variety of life-threatening genitourinary and oral cancers. As such, prevention via vaccination is critical. HPV vaccination is recommended for all adolescents beginning at 11 years of age. Although the immunization has proven to be safe and effective, HPV vaccination rates are substantially below target goals worldwide.
A literature review of evidence from the last five years was conducted to examine barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccine uptake. The most commonly cited barriers to vaccination included lack of knowledge about the vaccine and inadequate provider recommendation. Current evidence regarding interventions to increase HPV vaccine uptake reveal that best practices are multi-factorial and should include a combination of provider education and recommendation training. These findings led to the proposal of an evidence-based intervention aimed to increase adolescent HPV vaccination rates.
A one-hour educational program was conducted at a local pediatric primary care facility. Five healthcare providers participated in the program, which consisted of a PowerPoint presentation outlining the benefits of HPV vaccination and use of an interactive application from the CDC. The app taught participants how to offer a strong recommendation for the vaccine through active participation. Pre and posttests were administered to determine the providers’ intent to vaccinate and vaccination rates were monitored. Analysis of the data collected revealed a statistically significant rise in vaccination rates. These results reveal that provider education can improve recommendation techniques and therefore increase vaccine coverage. Further research is needed to see if one-time education is sustainable.
Introduction and Background: Drowning is the leading cause of preventable injury death in Arizona for children under five years old. Tailored education has demonstrated efficacy in behavior change and knowledge retention. The purpose of this evidence-based project was to evaluate if tailored education improved knowledge and self-reported behaviors related to pediatric drowning. The Elaboration Likelihood Model provided the framework for this project.
Methods/Experimental Approach: The prospective pilot project was conducted using the Iowa Model of Evidence Based Practice. Parents with children under five years, presenting with low acuity complaints in a pediatric emergency department were approached. A baseline assessment identified high-risk behaviors and a custom education plan was delivered to parents. Outcome variables were measured at baseline and three weeks after initial assessment.
Results: The average parent age was 29 (M = 28.5; SD = 6.35) years. Participant (n=29) responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Participants (n = 27, 93%) reported likelihood to change behaviors and 29 (100%) perceived the tailored intervention as relevant. Secondary outcome variables were not measured at three weeks due to a lack of survey response.
Conclusions: Parents reported a high likelihood of behavior change when water safety education was tailored and relevant to their child. The tailored intervention evoked positive interaction and receptivity from parents and suggested a high motivation to make a behavior change. The effect of the intervention could not be tested due to the lack of follow-up and post data collection. The design of this evidence-based project is quantifiable and replicable in a low-acuity setting, which allows for future evaluations of self-reported behavior change and knowledge improvement.
Funding: No sponsorship or financial conflict of interest.
Study Design: Ten health care providers from Vaccines for Children (VFC) clinics in New Mexico were included in this pretest/posttest study. Providers were given a questionnaire adapted from the Determinants of Intent to Vaccinate (DIVA) questionnaire. Only two subscales were utilized for this project (total of 10 items): Adaptation to the Patient’s Profile and General Practitioner’s Commitment to the Vaccine Approach. Martinez et al. (2016) suggest that PCP’s commitment to the vaccination approach” can be used as a stand-alone tool with a Cronbach’s alpha > .70. Following the pretest, which served as consent, providers viewed a short, four video series addressing common barriers to the HPV vaccine, followed by the same questionnaire. First and second dose rates of the HPV vaccine were measured prior to the intervention and three months post intervention using the New Mexico Immunization Information System (NMSIIS).
Results: A Wilcoxon Ranks test was used for statistical analysis of the survey responses. Alpha was set at ≤ .10. Four of the 10 questions were statistically significant for increasing provider intent to vaccinate. HPV first dose rates increased in all three clinics and second dose rates increased in two out of the three clinics.
Conclusions: Web-based education is a successful intervention for increasing
provider intent to vaccinate and first and second dose HPV administration rates. Not only can the intervention be used for the HPV vaccine, but to help increase administration rates of all other vaccines.