The Doctor of Nursing Practice Final Projects collection contains the completed works of students from the DNP Program at Arizona State University's College of Nursing and Health Innovation. These projects are the culminating product of the curricula and demonstrate clinical scholarship.

Collaborating Institutions:
College of Nursing and Health Innovation
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6
Filtering by

Clear all filters

582-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

Interprofessional collaboration (IP) is an approach used by healthcare organizations to improve the quality of care. Studies examining effects of IP with patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have shown improvement in A1C, blood pressure, lipids, self-efficacy and overall greater knowledge of disease process and management. The purpose of

Interprofessional collaboration (IP) is an approach used by healthcare organizations to improve the quality of care. Studies examining effects of IP with patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have shown improvement in A1C, blood pressure, lipids, self-efficacy and overall greater knowledge of disease process and management. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the impact of IP with attention to identifying and addressing social needs of patients with T2DM. Participants at least 18 years of age with an A1C >6.5% were identified; Spanish speaking patients were included in this project. The intervention included administration of Health Leads questionnaire to assess social needs. Monthly in person or phone meetings were conducted during a 3-month period.

The patient had the option to meet with the doctor of nursing practice (DNP) student as well as other members of the team including the clinical pharmacist and social work intern. Baseline A1C levels were extracted from chart at 1st monthly meeting. Post A1C levels were drawn at the 3 month follow up with their primary care provider. Study outcomes include the difference in A1C goal attainment, mean A1C and patient satisfaction. Pre A1C levels in participants ranged from 7.1% to 9.8% with a mean of 8.3%. Post A1C levels ranged from 6.9% to 8.6% with a mean of 7.7%. Two cases were excluded as they did not respond to the intervention. A paired-samples t test was calculated to compare the mean pre A1C level to the post A1C level. The mean pre A1C level was 8.24 (sd .879), and the post A1C level was 7.69 (sd .631). A significant decrease from pre to post A1C levels was found (t (6) = 2.82, p<.05).

The prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes is on the rise, as are the costs. This nation’s healthcare system must promote interprofessional collaboration and do a better job of addressing SDOH to more effectively engage patients in the management of their disease.

ContributorsTorres, Julia Patricia (Author) / Moffett, Carol (Thesis advisor)
Created2018-04-27
162156-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Background: Vaccination is an effective public health tool; however, immunization rates are low in American adults, with disparities existing for Hispanics compared to non-Hispanic Caucasians, uninsured individuals, undocumented immigrants, and low-income individuals (Lu et al., 2014; Lu et al., 2015; Williams et al., 2016). Consequently, 42,000 adults still die each

Background: Vaccination is an effective public health tool; however, immunization rates are low in American adults, with disparities existing for Hispanics compared to non-Hispanic Caucasians, uninsured individuals, undocumented immigrants, and low-income individuals (Lu et al., 2014; Lu et al., 2015; Williams et al., 2016). Consequently, 42,000 adults still die each year in the United States (US) from vaccine-preventable diseases, and nine billion dollars are spent on associated healthcare costs and lost productivity (ADHS, 2015; Wilson et al., 2019). To improve adult vaccination rates, the National Vaccine Advisory Committee recommends the Standards for Adult Immunization Practices, including regular assessment, recommendation, delivery or referral, and documentation during follow-up on vaccination (Orenstein et al., 2014; CDC, 2016). Local problem: A free clinic in Arizona serving uninsured, undocumented Latin American immigrants had low vaccination rates and a deficiency in vaccination documentation in electronic medical records. Methods: An evidence-based quality improvement project was conducted to address low vaccination rates and provider practices using a multi-component intervention. The effect and usage were evaluated through chart audits and pre- post-intervention surveys. Interventions: A vaccination questionnaire was administered at all in-person primary care visits. Brief educational videos were provided to providers and office staff before the intervention addressing the questionnaire's use, purpose, and goals. Adult immunization schedule printouts were made available in all patient rooms and provider charting areas. Additionally, a resource sheet on local free immunization programs was created for providers and patients. Results: The intervention's effect was unable to be determined due to a breakdown in the protocol after the second week of implementation. However, 92% of completed questionnaires reviewed indicated the patient needed one or more vaccination. Sixty-five percent of electronic medical records reviewed had no vaccination documentation historically for assessment, recommendation, referral, follow-up, or scanned vaccination records. No charts reviewed had these areas documented regularly. Conclusion: Vaccination rates and the Standards of Adult Immunization Practices are low at the free clinic. Further quality improvement measures are indicated addressing barriers present.
Created2021-04-27
162161-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
False accusations concerning the development of autism and other hazardous side effects have triggered parental vaccine hesitancy, leading to outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases. This opposition to vaccination risks the health of both individuals and entire communities. The purpose of this project was to determine the effectiveness of prenatal education on

False accusations concerning the development of autism and other hazardous side effects have triggered parental vaccine hesitancy, leading to outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases. This opposition to vaccination risks the health of both individuals and entire communities. The purpose of this project was to determine the effectiveness of prenatal education on maternal vaccine hesitancy and infant immunization rates. In a pretest posttest design, pregnant mothers greater than or equal to 30 weeks gestation were recruited by The Arizona Partnership for Immunization (TAPI) and virtually educated about infant immunization. A voice-over PowerPoint presentation was delivered to the participants virtually and focused on vaccine knowledge, intention to vaccinate, and vaccine hesitancy. These outcomes were evaluated virtually pre- and post-intervention with the Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines (PACV) survey (⍺ = 0.84), and the infants’ vaccination records were compared against the recommended immunization schedule at two months of age. Using the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks test, data analysis revealed vaccine hesitancy was significantly reduced between pre- and post-intervention (Z = 27.70, p = .000), and 100% of the 2-month-old infants were fully immunized with the recommended vaccines. The effect size (d = 12.807) also indicated a strong relationship between pre- and post-intervention vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy remains a threat to public health. With prenatal education, pregnant mothers will likely become more knowledgeable of vaccine benefits and better prepared to make informed decisions. Confident vaccination will decrease vaccine hesitancy and improve immunization rates, while promoting individual and societal health.
Created2021-04-27
162170-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
A federally qualified health center in the southwest United States serves low-income, uninsured communities. By provider reports, unprescribed antibiotic use is common in this clinic’s population, promoting development of antibiotic resistant bacteria. Antibiotics are widely available in Mexico and may be sold illegally in the United States without a prescription.

A federally qualified health center in the southwest United States serves low-income, uninsured communities. By provider reports, unprescribed antibiotic use is common in this clinic’s population, promoting development of antibiotic resistant bacteria. Antibiotics are widely available in Mexico and may be sold illegally in the United States without a prescription. This project’s purpose is to identify social risks and opportunities for antibiotic education. A telephone survey was administered to patients at least 18 years of age. The 32-item survey included a demographic questionnaire created for this project, the PRAPARE social determinants of health questionnaire, and the Eurobarometer antimicrobial resistance questionnaire. Any social risks identified were forwarded to clinic staff for referral. The survey was completed in English or Spanish, per the participant’s preference. A total of 20 surveys were completed. Low education level and unemployment were the most common social risks identified. Spanish language, housing and food insecurity, and difficulty meeting basic needs were associated with overall higher social risks. An antibiotic knowledge gap was identified, and self-medication with antibiotics was confirmed as a behavior within the population. Although no determinants for antibiotic misuse were identified, all participants indicated preference for provider-based education. This FQHC has an opportunity to develop a provider-based educational intervention. The length of the survey and the telephone format, required due to COVID-19 restrictions, were significant limitations, impacting recruitment. Further research is needed to determine the most effective way of delivering education. The clinic is continuing to administer the PRAPARE survey, expanding data on social risks.
Created2021-04-28
554-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

Background: Vaccine-preventable diseases significantly influence the health and academic success of college students. Despite the known negative impact of these diseases, vaccination rates routinely fall short of national goals and recommendations. Although vaccination decisions are complex, a recommendation from a health care provider is one of the key motivators for

Background: Vaccine-preventable diseases significantly influence the health and academic success of college students. Despite the known negative impact of these diseases, vaccination rates routinely fall short of national goals and recommendations. Although vaccination decisions are complex, a recommendation from a health care provider is one of the key motivators for individuals receiving a vaccine. Motivational interviewing (MI), a counseling approach primarily used to address substance abuse, can be applied to other health-related behaviors.

Local Problem: Despite previous quality improvement efforts aimed at increasing vaccine rates for influenza, human papillomavirus (HPV), and meningitis B (MenB), vaccinations at large university health centers have been well below benchmarks set by Healthy People 2020.

Methods: This study was guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior and included MI training and regular reinforcement for health care providers to address vaccine hesitancy with college students.

Results: Influenza vaccination rates improved, but HPV vaccine rates remained stable and MenB vaccine rates decreased compared with the previous year. Clinicians demonstrated a significant increase in knowledge of MI techniques after a targeted educational intervention. Repeat measures indicate the potential for sustained improvement when ongoing reinforcement is provided.

Conclusion: MI can be an effective part of a strategy to increase vaccination rates.

ContributorsWermers, Rita (Author) / Ostroski, Tammy (Author, Thesis advisor) / Hagler, Debra (Author, Thesis advisor)
Created2019-04-26
Description

The reactionary nature of the current healthcare delivery system in the United States has led to increased healthcare spending from acute exacerbations of chronic disease and unnecessary hospitalizations. Those who suffer from chronic diseases are particularly at risk. The dynamics of health care must include grappling with the complexities of

The reactionary nature of the current healthcare delivery system in the United States has led to increased healthcare spending from acute exacerbations of chronic disease and unnecessary hospitalizations. Those who suffer from chronic diseases are particularly at risk. The dynamics of health care must include grappling with the complexities of where and how people live and attempt to manage their health and disease. Team-based care may offer a solution due to its interdisciplinary focus on proactive, preventative care delivered in outpatient primary care.

Studies examining the effects of team-based care have shown improvement in; HbA1c, blood pressure, lipids, healthcare team morale, patient satisfaction rates, quality of care, and patient empowerment. In an effort to improve type 2 diabetes health outcomes and patient satisfaction a team based care project was implemented. The setting was an outpatient primary care clinic where the patients are known to have limited social resources. The healthcare team was comprised of a DNP Student, Master of Social Work Student, Clinical Pharmacist, and Primary Care Physician, who discussed patient specifics during informal meetings and referral processes.

Adult patients whose HbA1c level was greater than 6.5% were eligible to participate, 183 were identified and invited. Fourteen (14) agreed to participate and seven (7) completed the initial screening with a mean HbA1c of 9.7%. Significant social needs were identified using the Health Leads Questionnaire. The diabetes and social needs were addressed by members of the team who met individually with patients monthly over the course of three months. Of those who completed the initial evaluation only two (2) returned for a follow-up and had a repeat HbA1c. Both participants had important improvements in their A1C with a decrease of 2.3%, and 3.4%. The others were lost to follow up for unknown reasons. Despite the small numbers of participants this project suggests that patients can benefit when an interdisciplinary team addresses their needs and this could improve health outcomes.

ContributorsCody, Erin (Author) / Moffett, Carol (Thesis advisor) / Velasquez, Donna (Thesis advisor)
Created2017-05-02