This collection collates faculty and staff collections alphabetically by surname.

Displaying 1 - 10 of 23
Filtering by

Clear all filters

360-Thumbnail Image.png
DescriptionAddendum to document recording all the responses from the survey in table form. This document records all the additional comments made on the survey responses
Contributorsfarrelly, deg (Author) / Hutchison Surdi, Jane (Author) / Arizona State University. Libraries (Contributor)
Created2016-01-21
362-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

Explains the urgent need for libraries to engage in preservation of irreplaceable content on VHS and other obsolete video formats in their collections, and presents a database of titles for which due diligence as required by Section 108 of US Copyright has already been completed.

Contributorsfarrelly, deg (Author) / Arizona State University. Libraries (Contributor)
Created2016-10-21
363-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

In spring 2013, the presenters developed a survey on academic library streaming video and distributed it broadly through various discussion and mailing lists.

This is the first large-scale and most comprehensive effort to date to collect data on streaming video funding, licensing, acquisition, and hosting in academic libraries. Its results will

In spring 2013, the presenters developed a survey on academic library streaming video and distributed it broadly through various discussion and mailing lists.

This is the first large-scale and most comprehensive effort to date to collect data on streaming video funding, licensing, acquisition, and hosting in academic libraries. Its results will provide benchmark data for future explorations of this rapidly expanding approach to video in academic libraries.

Streaming video is becoming a common occurrence on many campuses today. Its fast growth is due in part to the steady growth of online classes and programs. Technology has also played a role in this growth as alternatives for ingesting and accessing content have expanded. Multiple options are now available including in-house approaches, cloud storage, and third party vendors.

This survey collected data on how academic institutions address the day-to-day operations related to streaming video as well as perceived directions for future action.

Survey questions addressed selection and acquisition of video in both hard copy and streaming formats, funding for acquisitions, current and planned hosting interfaces, cataloging and access, and current practice and policy on digitization of hard copy titles for streaming. This session reviews the instrument used, and provides a preliminary look at some of the key data collected.

Contributorsfarrelly, deg (Author) / Hutchison Surdi, Jane (Author) / Arizona State University. Libraries (Contributor)
Created2013-11-03
361-Thumbnail Image.jpg
DescriptionPoster presents information on group project to develop a crowd-sourced database of VHS titles eligible for duplication within Section 108 provisions of US copyright law.
Contributorsfarrelly, deg (Author) / Arizona State University. Libraries (Contributor)
Created2016-05-17
359-Thumbnail Image.png
DescriptionDocument recording all the responses from the survey in table form
Contributorsfarrelly, deg (Author) / Hutchison Surdi, Jane (Author) / Arizona State University. Libraries (Contributor)
Created2016-01-21
358-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

Survey instrument used in Survey of Academic Library Streaming Video Revisited, 2015

Contributorsfarrelly, deg (Author) / Hutchison Surdi, Jane (Author) / Arizona State University. Libraries (Contributor)
Created2015-04-30
364-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

Streaming video has been an option for academic libraries for nearly a decade. What is the state of streaming video in academic libraries today? How are these libraries acquiring streaming videos? Who makes acquisition decisions? How much staff time does supporting streaming video require?

Contributorsfarrelly, deg (Author) / Hutchison Surdi, Jane (Author) / Arizona State University. Libraries (Contributor)
Created2014-09-30
Description

Limited to streaming only those videos a vendor hosted, ASU Libraries sought to expand collection options with a trial project for hosting content locally. Kaltura, was selected as the platform, but Kaltura does not work out of the box. This presentation will cover how using Drupal, along with Kaltura, we

Limited to streaming only those videos a vendor hosted, ASU Libraries sought to expand collection options with a trial project for hosting content locally. Kaltura, was selected as the platform, but Kaltura does not work out of the box. This presentation will cover how using Drupal, along with Kaltura, we built a working video hosting solution. The presentation will cover administrative hurdles, stumbling blocks, pitfalls, enhancements, and lessons learned along the way.

ContributorsHarp, Matthew (Author) / farrelly, deg (Author) / Kurtz, Jeremy (Author) / Allgood, Tammy (Author)
Created2012-06-25
390-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

This paper presents a Bayesian framework for evaluative classification. Current education policy debates center on arguments about whether and how to use student test score data in school and personnel evaluation. Proponents of such use argue that refusing to use data violates both the public’s need to hold schools accountable

This paper presents a Bayesian framework for evaluative classification. Current education policy debates center on arguments about whether and how to use student test score data in school and personnel evaluation. Proponents of such use argue that refusing to use data violates both the public’s need to hold schools accountable when they use taxpayer dollars and students’ right to educational opportunities. Opponents of formulaic use of test-score data argue that most standardized test data is susceptible to fatal technical flaws, is a partial picture of student achievement, and leads to behavior that corrupts the measures.

A Bayesian perspective on summative ordinal classification is a possible framework for combining quantitative outcome data for students with the qualitative types of evaluation that critics of high-stakes testing advocate. This paper describes the key characteristics of a Bayesian perspective on classification, describes a method to translate a naïve Bayesian classifier into a point-based system for evaluation, and draws conclusions from the comparison on the construction of algorithmic (including point-based) systems that could capture the political and practical benefits of a Bayesian approach. The most important practical conclusion is that point-based systems with fixed components and weights cannot capture the dynamic and political benefits of a reciprocal relationship between professional judgment and quantitative student outcome data.

ContributorsDorn, Sherman (Author) / Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College (Contributor)
Created2009