ASU Electronic Theses and Dissertations
This collection includes most of the ASU Theses and Dissertations from 2011 to present. ASU Theses and Dissertations are available in downloadable PDF format; however, a small percentage of items are under embargo. Information about the dissertations/theses includes degree information, committee members, an abstract, supporting data or media.
In addition to the electronic theses found in the ASU Digital Repository, ASU Theses and Dissertations can be found in the ASU Library Catalog.
Dissertations and Theses granted by Arizona State University are archived and made available through a joint effort of the ASU Graduate College and the ASU Libraries. For more information or questions about this collection contact or visit the Digital Repository ETD Library Guide or contact the ASU Graduate College at gradformat@asu.edu.
Displaying 11 - 20 of 36
Description
Automated planning problems classically involve finding a sequence of actions that transform an initial state to some state satisfying a conjunctive set of goals with no temporal constraints. But in many real-world problems, the best plan may involve satisfying only a subset of goals or missing defined goal deadlines. For example, this may be required when goals are logically conflicting, or when there are time or cost constraints such that achieving all goals on time may be too expensive. In this case, goals and deadlines must be declared as soft. I call these partial satisfaction planning (PSP) problems. In this work, I focus on particular types of PSP problems, where goals are given a quantitative value based on whether (or when) they are achieved. The objective is to find a plan with the best quality. A first challenge is in finding adequate goal representations that capture common types of goal achievement rewards and costs. One popular representation is to give a single reward on each goal of a planning problem. I further expand on this approach by allowing users to directly introduce utility dependencies, providing for changes of goal achievement reward directly based on the goals a plan achieves. After, I introduce time-dependent goal costs, where a plan incurs penalty if it will achieve a goal past a specified deadline. To solve PSP problems with goal utility dependencies, I look at using state-of-the-art methodologies currently employed for classical planning problems involving heuristic search. In doing so, one faces the challenge of simultaneously determining the best set of goals and plan to achieve them. This is complicated by utility dependencies defined by a user and cost dependencies within the plan. To address this, I introduce a set of heuristics based on combinations using relaxed plans and integer programming formulations. Further, I explore an approach to improve search through learning techniques by using automatically generated state features to find new states from which to search. Finally, the investigation into handling time-dependent goal costs leads us to an improved search technique derived from observations based on solving discretized approximations of cost functions.
ContributorsBenton, J (Author) / Kambhampati, Subbarao (Thesis advisor) / Baral, Chitta (Committee member) / Do, Minh B. (Committee member) / Smith, David E. (Committee member) / Langley, Pat (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2012
Description
The goal of fact checking is to determine if a given claim holds. A promising ap- proach for this task is to exploit reference information in the form of knowledge graphs (KGs), a structured and formal representation of knowledge with semantic descriptions of entities and relations. KGs are successfully used in multiple appli- cations, but the information stored in a KG is inevitably incomplete. In order to address the incompleteness problem, this thesis proposes a new method built on top of recent results in logical rule discovery in KGs called RuDik and a probabilistic extension of answer set programs called LPMLN.
This thesis presents the integration of RuDik which discovers logical rules over a given KG and LPMLN to do probabilistic inference to validate a fact. While automatically discovered rules over a KG are for human selection and revision, they can be turned into LPMLN programs with a minor modification. Leveraging the probabilistic inference in LPMLN, it is possible to (i) derive new information which is not explicitly stored in a KG with a probability associated with it, and (ii) provide supporting facts and rules for interpretable explanations for such decisions.
Also, this thesis presents experiments and results to show that this approach can label claims with high precision. The evaluation of the system also sheds light on the role played by the quality of the given rules and the quality of the KG.
This thesis presents the integration of RuDik which discovers logical rules over a given KG and LPMLN to do probabilistic inference to validate a fact. While automatically discovered rules over a KG are for human selection and revision, they can be turned into LPMLN programs with a minor modification. Leveraging the probabilistic inference in LPMLN, it is possible to (i) derive new information which is not explicitly stored in a KG with a probability associated with it, and (ii) provide supporting facts and rules for interpretable explanations for such decisions.
Also, this thesis presents experiments and results to show that this approach can label claims with high precision. The evaluation of the system also sheds light on the role played by the quality of the given rules and the quality of the KG.
ContributorsPradhan, Anish (Author) / Lee, Joohyung (Thesis advisor) / Baral, Chitta (Committee member) / Papotti, Paolo (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018
Description
Reasoning about the activities of cyber threat actors is critical to defend against cyber
attacks. However, this task is difficult for a variety of reasons. In simple terms, it is difficult
to determine who the attacker is, what the desired goals are of the attacker, and how they will
carry out their attacks. These three questions essentially entail understanding the attacker’s
use of deception, the capabilities available, and the intent of launching the attack. These
three issues are highly inter-related. If an adversary can hide their intent, they can better
deceive a defender. If an adversary’s capabilities are not well understood, then determining
what their goals are becomes difficult as the defender is uncertain if they have the necessary
tools to accomplish them. However, the understanding of these aspects are also mutually
supportive. If we have a clear picture of capabilities, intent can better be deciphered. If we
understand intent and capabilities, a defender may be able to see through deception schemes.
In this dissertation, I present three pieces of work to tackle these questions to obtain
a better understanding of cyber threats. First, we introduce a new reasoning framework
to address deception. We evaluate the framework by building a dataset from DEFCON
capture-the-flag exercise to identify the person or group responsible for a cyber attack.
We demonstrate that the framework not only handles cases of deception but also provides
transparent decision making in identifying the threat actor. The second task uses a cognitive
learning model to determine the intent – goals of the threat actor on the target system.
The third task looks at understanding the capabilities of threat actors to target systems by
identifying at-risk systems from hacker discussions on darkweb websites. To achieve this
task we gather discussions from more than 300 darkweb websites relating to malicious
hacking.
attacks. However, this task is difficult for a variety of reasons. In simple terms, it is difficult
to determine who the attacker is, what the desired goals are of the attacker, and how they will
carry out their attacks. These three questions essentially entail understanding the attacker’s
use of deception, the capabilities available, and the intent of launching the attack. These
three issues are highly inter-related. If an adversary can hide their intent, they can better
deceive a defender. If an adversary’s capabilities are not well understood, then determining
what their goals are becomes difficult as the defender is uncertain if they have the necessary
tools to accomplish them. However, the understanding of these aspects are also mutually
supportive. If we have a clear picture of capabilities, intent can better be deciphered. If we
understand intent and capabilities, a defender may be able to see through deception schemes.
In this dissertation, I present three pieces of work to tackle these questions to obtain
a better understanding of cyber threats. First, we introduce a new reasoning framework
to address deception. We evaluate the framework by building a dataset from DEFCON
capture-the-flag exercise to identify the person or group responsible for a cyber attack.
We demonstrate that the framework not only handles cases of deception but also provides
transparent decision making in identifying the threat actor. The second task uses a cognitive
learning model to determine the intent – goals of the threat actor on the target system.
The third task looks at understanding the capabilities of threat actors to target systems by
identifying at-risk systems from hacker discussions on darkweb websites. To achieve this
task we gather discussions from more than 300 darkweb websites relating to malicious
hacking.
ContributorsNunes, Eric (Author) / Shakarian, Paulo (Thesis advisor) / Ahn, Gail-Joon (Committee member) / Baral, Chitta (Committee member) / Cooke, Nancy J. (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018
Description
Teams are increasingly indispensable to achievements in any organizations. Despite the organizations' substantial dependency on teams, fundamental knowledge about the conduct of team-enabled operations is lacking, especially at the {\it social, cognitive} and {\it information} level in relation to team performance and network dynamics. The goal of this dissertation is to create new instruments to {\it predict}, {\it optimize} and {\it explain} teams' performance in the context of composite networks (i.e., social-cognitive-information networks).
Understanding the dynamic mechanisms that drive the success of high-performing teams can provide the key insights into building the best teams and hence lift the productivity and profitability of the organizations. For this purpose, novel predictive models to forecast the long-term performance of teams ({\it point prediction}) as well as the pathway to impact ({\it trajectory prediction}) have been developed. A joint predictive model by exploring the relationship between team level and individual level performances has also been proposed.
For an existing team, it is often desirable to optimize its performance through expanding the team by bringing a new team member with certain expertise, or finding a new candidate to replace an existing under-performing member. I have developed graph kernel based performance optimization algorithms by considering both the structural matching and skill matching to solve the above enhancement scenarios. I have also worked towards real time team optimization by leveraging reinforcement learning techniques.
With the increased complexity of the machine learning models for predicting and optimizing teams, it is critical to acquire a deeper understanding of model behavior. For this purpose, I have investigated {\em explainable prediction} -- to provide explanation behind a performance prediction and {\em explainable optimization} -- to give reasons why the model recommendations are good candidates for certain enhancement scenarios.
Understanding the dynamic mechanisms that drive the success of high-performing teams can provide the key insights into building the best teams and hence lift the productivity and profitability of the organizations. For this purpose, novel predictive models to forecast the long-term performance of teams ({\it point prediction}) as well as the pathway to impact ({\it trajectory prediction}) have been developed. A joint predictive model by exploring the relationship between team level and individual level performances has also been proposed.
For an existing team, it is often desirable to optimize its performance through expanding the team by bringing a new team member with certain expertise, or finding a new candidate to replace an existing under-performing member. I have developed graph kernel based performance optimization algorithms by considering both the structural matching and skill matching to solve the above enhancement scenarios. I have also worked towards real time team optimization by leveraging reinforcement learning techniques.
With the increased complexity of the machine learning models for predicting and optimizing teams, it is critical to acquire a deeper understanding of model behavior. For this purpose, I have investigated {\em explainable prediction} -- to provide explanation behind a performance prediction and {\em explainable optimization} -- to give reasons why the model recommendations are good candidates for certain enhancement scenarios.
ContributorsLi, Liangyue (Author) / Tong, Hanghang (Thesis advisor) / Baral, Chitta (Committee member) / Liu, Huan (Committee member) / Buchler, Norbou (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018
Description
Multimodal Representation Learning is a multi-disciplinary research field which aims to integrate information from multiple communicative modalities in a meaningful manner to help solve some downstream task. These modalities can be visual, acoustic, linguistic, haptic etc. The interpretation of ’meaningful integration of information from different modalities’ remains modality and task dependent. The downstream task can range from understanding one modality in the presence of information from other modalities, to that of translating input from one modality to another. In this thesis the utility of multimodal representation learning for understanding one modality vis-à-vis Image Understanding for Visual Reasoning given corresponding information in other modalities, as well as translating from one modality to the other, specifically, Text to Image Translation was investigated.
Visual Reasoning has been an active area of research in computer vision. It encompasses advanced image processing and artificial intelligence techniques to locate, characterize and recognize objects, regions and their attributes in the image in order to comprehend the image itself. One way of building a visual reasoning system is to ask the system to answer questions about the image that requires attribute identification, counting, comparison, multi-step attention, and reasoning. An intelligent system is thought to have a proper grasp of the image if it can answer said questions correctly and provide a valid reasoning for the given answers. In this work how a system can be built by learning a multimodal representation between the stated image and the questions was investigated. Also, how background knowledge, specifically scene-graph information, if available, can be incorporated into existing image understanding models was demonstrated.
Multimodal learning provides an intuitive way of learning a joint representation between different modalities. Such a joint representation can be used to translate from one modality to the other. It also gives way to learning a shared representation between these varied modalities and allows to provide meaning to what this shared representation should capture. In this work, using the surrogate task of text to image translation, neural network based architectures to learn a shared representation between these two modalities was investigated. Also, the ability that such a shared representation is capable of capturing parts of different modalities that are equivalent in some sense is proposed. Specifically, given an image and a semantic description of certain objects present in the image, a shared representation between the text and the image modality capable of capturing parts of the image being mentioned in the text was demonstrated. Such a capability was showcased on a publicly available dataset.
Visual Reasoning has been an active area of research in computer vision. It encompasses advanced image processing and artificial intelligence techniques to locate, characterize and recognize objects, regions and their attributes in the image in order to comprehend the image itself. One way of building a visual reasoning system is to ask the system to answer questions about the image that requires attribute identification, counting, comparison, multi-step attention, and reasoning. An intelligent system is thought to have a proper grasp of the image if it can answer said questions correctly and provide a valid reasoning for the given answers. In this work how a system can be built by learning a multimodal representation between the stated image and the questions was investigated. Also, how background knowledge, specifically scene-graph information, if available, can be incorporated into existing image understanding models was demonstrated.
Multimodal learning provides an intuitive way of learning a joint representation between different modalities. Such a joint representation can be used to translate from one modality to the other. It also gives way to learning a shared representation between these varied modalities and allows to provide meaning to what this shared representation should capture. In this work, using the surrogate task of text to image translation, neural network based architectures to learn a shared representation between these two modalities was investigated. Also, the ability that such a shared representation is capable of capturing parts of different modalities that are equivalent in some sense is proposed. Specifically, given an image and a semantic description of certain objects present in the image, a shared representation between the text and the image modality capable of capturing parts of the image being mentioned in the text was demonstrated. Such a capability was showcased on a publicly available dataset.
ContributorsSaha, Rudra (Author) / Yang, Yezhou (Thesis advisor) / Singh, Maneesh Kumar (Committee member) / Baral, Chitta (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018
Description
Knowledge Representation (KR) is one of the prominent approaches to Artificial Intelligence (AI) that is concerned with representing knowledge in a form that computer systems can utilize to solve complex problems. Answer Set Programming (ASP), based on the stable model semantics, is a widely-used KR framework that facilitates elegant and efficient representations for many problem domains that require complex reasoning.
However, while ASP is effective on deterministic problem domains, it is not suitable for applications involving quantitative uncertainty, for example, those that require probabilistic reasoning. Furthermore, it is hard to utilize information that can be statistically induced from data with ASP problem modeling.
This dissertation presents the language LP^MLN, which is a probabilistic extension of the stable model semantics with the concept of weighted rules, inspired by Markov Logic. An LP^MLN program defines a probability distribution over "soft" stable models, which may not satisfy all rules, but the more rules with the bigger weights they satisfy, the bigger their probabilities. LP^MLN takes advantage of both ASP and Markov Logic in a single framework, allowing representation of problems that require both logical and probabilistic reasoning in an intuitive and elaboration tolerant way.
This dissertation establishes formal relations between LP^MLN and several other formalisms, discusses inference and weight learning algorithms under LP^MLN, and presents systems implementing the algorithms. LP^MLN systems can be used to compute other languages translatable into LP^MLN.
The advantage of LP^MLN for probabilistic reasoning is illustrated by a probabilistic extension of the action language BC+, called pBC+, defined as a high-level notation of LP^MLN for describing transition systems. Various probabilistic reasoning about transition systems, especially probabilistic diagnosis, can be modeled in pBC+ and computed using LP^MLN systems. pBC+ is further extended with the notion of utility, through a decision-theoretic extension of LP^MLN, and related with Markov Decision Process (MDP) in terms of policy optimization problems. pBC+ can be used to represent (PO)MDP in a succinct and elaboration tolerant way, which enables planning with (PO)MDP algorithms in action domains whose description requires rich KR constructs, such as recursive definitions and indirect effects of actions.
However, while ASP is effective on deterministic problem domains, it is not suitable for applications involving quantitative uncertainty, for example, those that require probabilistic reasoning. Furthermore, it is hard to utilize information that can be statistically induced from data with ASP problem modeling.
This dissertation presents the language LP^MLN, which is a probabilistic extension of the stable model semantics with the concept of weighted rules, inspired by Markov Logic. An LP^MLN program defines a probability distribution over "soft" stable models, which may not satisfy all rules, but the more rules with the bigger weights they satisfy, the bigger their probabilities. LP^MLN takes advantage of both ASP and Markov Logic in a single framework, allowing representation of problems that require both logical and probabilistic reasoning in an intuitive and elaboration tolerant way.
This dissertation establishes formal relations between LP^MLN and several other formalisms, discusses inference and weight learning algorithms under LP^MLN, and presents systems implementing the algorithms. LP^MLN systems can be used to compute other languages translatable into LP^MLN.
The advantage of LP^MLN for probabilistic reasoning is illustrated by a probabilistic extension of the action language BC+, called pBC+, defined as a high-level notation of LP^MLN for describing transition systems. Various probabilistic reasoning about transition systems, especially probabilistic diagnosis, can be modeled in pBC+ and computed using LP^MLN systems. pBC+ is further extended with the notion of utility, through a decision-theoretic extension of LP^MLN, and related with Markov Decision Process (MDP) in terms of policy optimization problems. pBC+ can be used to represent (PO)MDP in a succinct and elaboration tolerant way, which enables planning with (PO)MDP algorithms in action domains whose description requires rich KR constructs, such as recursive definitions and indirect effects of actions.
ContributorsWang, Yi (Author) / Lee, Joohyung (Thesis advisor) / Baral, Chitta (Committee member) / Kambhampati, Subbarao (Committee member) / Natarajan, Sriraam (Committee member) / Srivastava, Siddharth (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019
Description
There have been extensive research in how news and twitter feeds can affect the outcome of a given stock. However, a majority of this research has studied the short term effects of sentiment with a given stock price. Within this research, I studied the long-term effects of a given stock price using fundamental analysis techniques. Within this research, I collected both sentiment data and fundamental data for Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Peabody Energy Corp. Using a neural network algorithm, I found that sentiment does have an effect on the annual growth of these companies but the fundamentals are more relevant when determining overall growth. The stocks which show more consistent growth hold more importance on the previous year’s stock price but companies which have less consistency in their growth showed more reliance on the revenue growth and sentiment on the overall company and CEO. I discuss how I collected my research data and used a multi-layered perceptron to predict a threshold growth of a given stock. The threshold used for this particular research was 10%. I then showed the prediction of this threshold using my perceptron and afterwards, perform an f anova test on my choice of features. The results showed the fundamentals being the better predictor of stock information but fundamentals came in a close second in several cases, proving sentiment does hold an effect over long term growth.
ContributorsReeves, Tyler Joseph (Author) / Davulcu, Hasan (Thesis advisor) / Baral, Chitta (Committee member) / Cesta, John (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2016
Description
For the past three decades, the design of an effective strategy for generating poetry that matches that of a human’s creative capabilities and complexities has been an elusive goal in artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language generation (NLG) research, and among linguistic creativity researchers in particular. This thesis presents a novel approach to fixed verse poetry generation using neural word embeddings. During the course of generation, a two layered poetry classifier is developed. The first layer uses a lexicon based method to classify poems into types based on form and structure, and the second layer uses a supervised classification method to classify poems into subtypes based on content with an accuracy of 92%. The system then uses a two-layer neural network to generate poetry based on word similarities and word movements in a 50-dimensional vector space.
The verses generated by the system are evaluated using rhyme, rhythm, syllable counts and stress patterns. These computational features of language are considered for generating haikus, limericks and iambic pentameter verses. The generated poems are evaluated using a Turing test on both experts and non-experts. The user study finds that only 38% computer generated poems were correctly identified by nonexperts while 65% of the computer generated poems were correctly identified by experts. Although the system does not pass the Turing test, the results from the Turing test suggest an improvement of over 17% when compared to previous methods which use Turing tests to evaluate poetry generators.
The verses generated by the system are evaluated using rhyme, rhythm, syllable counts and stress patterns. These computational features of language are considered for generating haikus, limericks and iambic pentameter verses. The generated poems are evaluated using a Turing test on both experts and non-experts. The user study finds that only 38% computer generated poems were correctly identified by nonexperts while 65% of the computer generated poems were correctly identified by experts. Although the system does not pass the Turing test, the results from the Turing test suggest an improvement of over 17% when compared to previous methods which use Turing tests to evaluate poetry generators.
ContributorsMagge, Arjun (Author) / Syrotiuk, Violet R. (Thesis advisor) / Baral, Chitta (Committee member) / Hogue, Cynthia (Committee member) / Bazzi, Rida (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2016
Description
Science instructors need questions for use in exams, homework assignments, class discussions, reviews, and other instructional activities. Textbooks never have enough questions, so instructors must find them from other sources or generate their own questions. In order to supply instructors with biology questions, a semantic network approach was developed for generating open response biology questions. The generated questions were compared to professional authorized questions.
To boost students’ learning experience, adaptive selection was built on the generated questions. Bayesian Knowledge Tracing was used as embedded assessment of the student’s current competence so that a suitable question could be selected based on the student’s previous performance. A between-subjects experiment with 42 participants was performed, where half of the participants studied with adaptive selected questions and the rest studied with mal-adaptive order of questions. Both groups significantly improved their test scores, and the participants in adaptive group registered larger learning gains than participants in the control group.
To explore the possibility of generating rich instructional feedback for machine-generated questions, a question-paragraph mapping task was identified. Given a set of questions and a list of paragraphs for a textbook, the goal of the task was to map the related paragraphs to each question. An algorithm was developed whose performance was comparable to human annotators.
A multiple-choice question with high quality distractors (incorrect answers) can be pedagogically valuable as well as being much easier to grade than open-response questions. Thus, an algorithm was developed to generate good distractors for multiple-choice questions. The machine-generated multiple-choice questions were compared to human-generated questions in terms of three measures: question difficulty, question discrimination and distractor usefulness. By recruiting 200 participants from Amazon Mechanical Turk, it turned out that the two types of questions performed very closely on all the three measures.
To boost students’ learning experience, adaptive selection was built on the generated questions. Bayesian Knowledge Tracing was used as embedded assessment of the student’s current competence so that a suitable question could be selected based on the student’s previous performance. A between-subjects experiment with 42 participants was performed, where half of the participants studied with adaptive selected questions and the rest studied with mal-adaptive order of questions. Both groups significantly improved their test scores, and the participants in adaptive group registered larger learning gains than participants in the control group.
To explore the possibility of generating rich instructional feedback for machine-generated questions, a question-paragraph mapping task was identified. Given a set of questions and a list of paragraphs for a textbook, the goal of the task was to map the related paragraphs to each question. An algorithm was developed whose performance was comparable to human annotators.
A multiple-choice question with high quality distractors (incorrect answers) can be pedagogically valuable as well as being much easier to grade than open-response questions. Thus, an algorithm was developed to generate good distractors for multiple-choice questions. The machine-generated multiple-choice questions were compared to human-generated questions in terms of three measures: question difficulty, question discrimination and distractor usefulness. By recruiting 200 participants from Amazon Mechanical Turk, it turned out that the two types of questions performed very closely on all the three measures.
ContributorsZhang, Lishang (Author) / VanLehn, Kurt (Thesis advisor) / Baral, Chitta (Committee member) / Hsiao, Ihan (Committee member) / Wright, Christian (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015
Description
Due to vast resources brought by social media services, social data mining has
received increasing attention in recent years. The availability of sheer amounts of
user-generated data presents data scientists both opportunities and challenges. Opportunities are presented with additional data sources. The abundant link information
in social networks could provide another rich source in deriving implicit information
for social data mining. However, the vast majority of existing studies overwhelmingly
focus on positive links between users while negative links are also prevailing in real-
world social networks such as distrust relations in Epinions and foe links in Slashdot.
Though recent studies show that negative links have some added value over positive
links, it is dicult to directly employ them because of its distinct characteristics from
positive interactions. Another challenge is that label information is rather limited
in social media as the labeling process requires human attention and may be very
expensive. Hence, alternative criteria are needed to guide the learning process for
many tasks such as feature selection and sentiment analysis.
To address above-mentioned issues, I study two novel problems for signed social
networks mining, (1) unsupervised feature selection in signed social networks; and
(2) unsupervised sentiment analysis with signed social networks. To tackle the first problem, I propose a novel unsupervised feature selection framework SignedFS. In
particular, I model positive and negative links simultaneously for user preference
learning, and then embed the user preference learning into feature selection. To study the second problem, I incorporate explicit sentiment signals in textual terms and
implicit sentiment signals from signed social networks into a coherent model Signed-
Senti. Empirical experiments on real-world datasets corroborate the effectiveness of
these two frameworks on the tasks of feature selection and sentiment analysis.
received increasing attention in recent years. The availability of sheer amounts of
user-generated data presents data scientists both opportunities and challenges. Opportunities are presented with additional data sources. The abundant link information
in social networks could provide another rich source in deriving implicit information
for social data mining. However, the vast majority of existing studies overwhelmingly
focus on positive links between users while negative links are also prevailing in real-
world social networks such as distrust relations in Epinions and foe links in Slashdot.
Though recent studies show that negative links have some added value over positive
links, it is dicult to directly employ them because of its distinct characteristics from
positive interactions. Another challenge is that label information is rather limited
in social media as the labeling process requires human attention and may be very
expensive. Hence, alternative criteria are needed to guide the learning process for
many tasks such as feature selection and sentiment analysis.
To address above-mentioned issues, I study two novel problems for signed social
networks mining, (1) unsupervised feature selection in signed social networks; and
(2) unsupervised sentiment analysis with signed social networks. To tackle the first problem, I propose a novel unsupervised feature selection framework SignedFS. In
particular, I model positive and negative links simultaneously for user preference
learning, and then embed the user preference learning into feature selection. To study the second problem, I incorporate explicit sentiment signals in textual terms and
implicit sentiment signals from signed social networks into a coherent model Signed-
Senti. Empirical experiments on real-world datasets corroborate the effectiveness of
these two frameworks on the tasks of feature selection and sentiment analysis.
ContributorsCheng, Kewei (Author) / Liu, Huan (Thesis advisor) / Tong, Hanghang (Committee member) / Baral, Chitta (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2017