This collection includes most of the ASU Theses and Dissertations from 2011 to present. ASU Theses and Dissertations are available in downloadable PDF format; however, a small percentage of items are under embargo. Information about the dissertations/theses includes degree information, committee members, an abstract, supporting data or media.

In addition to the electronic theses found in the ASU Digital Repository, ASU Theses and Dissertations can be found in the ASU Library Catalog.

Dissertations and Theses granted by Arizona State University are archived and made available through a joint effort of the ASU Graduate College and the ASU Libraries. For more information or questions about this collection contact or visit the Digital Repository ETD Library Guide or contact the ASU Graduate College at gradformat@asu.edu.

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
Filtering by

Clear all filters

187512-Thumbnail Image.png
Description疫情期间,人们与社区发生了高频链接。流调、核酸、求助,社区工作者无时不刻出现在人们的生活中。社区作为中国基层治理的基础单元,政府需要上而下到社区执行防控工作,百姓则自下而上需要社区提供服务和帮助、向上反映各类居民诉求。伴随着中国的城镇化进程,全中国有9万个城市社区、400万社区工作者,社区参与主体从居委会、物业到民非组织,不断地进化。在人们对未来生活需求不断提高的时侯,社区服务提供者协同社区各主体,实现数字社区可持续发展?本研究围绕“社区服务提供者如何在后疫情时代构建可持续的社区协同机制?”这一研究问题,首先,对数字社区可持续发展和数字社区协同机制相关研究进行梳理和回顾;第二,将以数字社区建设和协同治理为出发点,以七彩集团为研究样本,分析其实际运营的滨江缤纷未来社区和萧山瓜沥未来社区案例,归纳总结其协同治理的具体措施;第三,结合理论规范分析,提出“数字社区协同机制-协同绩效”的理论框架和作用边界;第四,运用问卷调查结合因子分析的方法,对这些具体措施能够实际提高企业绩效进行问卷发放和数据验证。 本研究得到以下三个主要结论:(1)数字社区中可持续性发展协同治理机制是社区运营主体利用数字化技术对社区内参与提供和使用服务的治理活动进行约束、激励、引导和管理的一系列制度安排,同时包括政策治理、社区文化和市场共建三种不同作用机制。(2)数字社区中,治理政策机制仅在社团主体中作用显著;社区文化除了在社区物业中作用有限,在其他所有主体中均发挥重要作用;市场共建则是在社团、物业和居民业主中发挥作用。(3)协同机制通过政策治理、社区文化、市场共建影响社区内不同主体的感知和行为,而数字技术作用一种新兴的支撑性技术能够对上述作用产生不同的增强作用,进而促进协同绩效提升。 本研究通过聚焦于社区运营六方主体的角色分工、各自诉求,进一步讨论如何应用最新数字经济和技术来找到可持续发展的协同机制,为后疫情时代中国社区的良性发展找到解决方案。
ContributorsXu, Xiaowei (Author) / Shao, Benjamin (Thesis advisor) / Zhang, Anmin (Thesis advisor) / Gu, Bin (Committee member) / Hong, Yili (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023
153564-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Accompanying with the development of economy system and the completion of legal framework, Chinese domestic PE industry not only transfused vigor and vividness to capital market, but also generated contribution to substantial economy with a rapid pace in recent decades.

Depending on the first move advantage and

Accompanying with the development of economy system and the completion of legal framework, Chinese domestic PE industry not only transfused vigor and vividness to capital market, but also generated contribution to substantial economy with a rapid pace in recent decades.

Depending on the first move advantage and an affinity with Chinese government, PE industry initially was led by state-owned enterprises. However, these non-market-oriented PE institutions confronted challenge from the perspective of culture, structure and mechanism and crises of outflow of human capital and lacking capability of sustainable development while private section and foreign capital enter the market.

Based on the figure of PE investment and the pattern of historical development in foreign and domestic market, this article specifically analyzed the history of state-backed PE industry‘s development and both advantage and disadvantage of state-backed PE institutions according to real cases intending to improve the competitive strength of state-backed enterprises and to promote a state-backed PE institutions to world-class enterprises through the application of a multi-dimensional stock equity structure, the advantage in accessibility of resource as state-backed enterprises, a market-oriented system and the ability of key staffs.
ContributorsChen, Zhihai (Author) / Wang, Tan (Thesis advisor) / Hwang, Yuhchang (Thesis advisor) / Chen, Hong (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015