ASU Electronic Theses and Dissertations
This collection includes most of the ASU Theses and Dissertations from 2011 to present. ASU Theses and Dissertations are available in downloadable PDF format; however, a small percentage of items are under embargo. Information about the dissertations/theses includes degree information, committee members, an abstract, supporting data or media.
In addition to the electronic theses found in the ASU Digital Repository, ASU Theses and Dissertations can be found in the ASU Library Catalog.
Dissertations and Theses granted by Arizona State University are archived and made available through a joint effort of the ASU Graduate College and the ASU Libraries. For more information or questions about this collection contact or visit the Digital Repository ETD Library Guide or contact the ASU Graduate College at gradformat@asu.edu.
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Data sets
Description
In this thesis, I present two new datasets and a modification to the existing models in the form of a novel attention mechanism for Natural Language Inference (NLI). The new datasets have been carefully synthesized from various existing corpora released for different tasks.
The task of NLI is to determine the possibility of a sentence referred to as “Hypothesis” being true given that another sentence referred to as “Premise” is true. In other words, the task is to identify whether the “Premise” entails, contradicts or remains neutral with regards to the “Hypothesis”. NLI is a precursor to solving many Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks such as Question Answering and Semantic Search. For example, in Question Answering systems, the question is paraphrased to form a declarative statement which is treated as the hypothesis. The options are treated as the premise. The option with the maximum entailment score is considered as the answer. Considering the applications of NLI, the importance of having a strong NLI system can't be stressed enough.
Many large-scale datasets and models have been released in order to advance the field of NLI. While all of these models do get good accuracy on the test sets of the datasets they were trained on, they fail to capture the basic understanding of “Entities” and “Roles”. They often make the mistake of inferring that “John went to the market.” from “Peter went to the market.” failing to capture the notion of “Entities”. In other cases, these models don't understand the difference in the “Roles” played by the same entities in “Premise” and “Hypothesis” sentences and end up wrongly inferring that “Peter drove John to the stadium.” from “John drove Peter to the stadium.”
The lack of understanding of “Roles” can be attributed to the lack of such examples in the various existing datasets. The reason for the existing model’s failure in capturing the notion of “Entities” is not just due to the lack of such examples in the existing NLI datasets. It can also be attributed to the strict use of vector similarity in the “word-to-word” attention mechanism being used in the existing architectures.
To overcome these issues, I present two new datasets to help make the NLI systems capture the notion of “Entities” and “Roles”. The “NER Changed” (NC) dataset and the “Role-Switched” (RS) dataset contains examples of Premise-Hypothesis pairs that require the understanding of “Entities” and “Roles” respectively in order to be able to make correct inferences. This work shows how the existing architectures perform poorly on the “NER Changed” (NC) dataset even after being trained on the new datasets. In order to help the existing architectures, understand the notion of “Entities”, this work proposes a modification to the “word-to-word” attention mechanism. Instead of relying on vector similarity alone, the modified architectures learn to incorporate the “Symbolic Similarity” as well by using the Named-Entity features of the Premise and Hypothesis sentences. The new modified architectures not only perform significantly better than the unmodified architectures on the “NER Changed” (NC) dataset but also performs as well on the existing datasets.
The task of NLI is to determine the possibility of a sentence referred to as “Hypothesis” being true given that another sentence referred to as “Premise” is true. In other words, the task is to identify whether the “Premise” entails, contradicts or remains neutral with regards to the “Hypothesis”. NLI is a precursor to solving many Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks such as Question Answering and Semantic Search. For example, in Question Answering systems, the question is paraphrased to form a declarative statement which is treated as the hypothesis. The options are treated as the premise. The option with the maximum entailment score is considered as the answer. Considering the applications of NLI, the importance of having a strong NLI system can't be stressed enough.
Many large-scale datasets and models have been released in order to advance the field of NLI. While all of these models do get good accuracy on the test sets of the datasets they were trained on, they fail to capture the basic understanding of “Entities” and “Roles”. They often make the mistake of inferring that “John went to the market.” from “Peter went to the market.” failing to capture the notion of “Entities”. In other cases, these models don't understand the difference in the “Roles” played by the same entities in “Premise” and “Hypothesis” sentences and end up wrongly inferring that “Peter drove John to the stadium.” from “John drove Peter to the stadium.”
The lack of understanding of “Roles” can be attributed to the lack of such examples in the various existing datasets. The reason for the existing model’s failure in capturing the notion of “Entities” is not just due to the lack of such examples in the existing NLI datasets. It can also be attributed to the strict use of vector similarity in the “word-to-word” attention mechanism being used in the existing architectures.
To overcome these issues, I present two new datasets to help make the NLI systems capture the notion of “Entities” and “Roles”. The “NER Changed” (NC) dataset and the “Role-Switched” (RS) dataset contains examples of Premise-Hypothesis pairs that require the understanding of “Entities” and “Roles” respectively in order to be able to make correct inferences. This work shows how the existing architectures perform poorly on the “NER Changed” (NC) dataset even after being trained on the new datasets. In order to help the existing architectures, understand the notion of “Entities”, this work proposes a modification to the “word-to-word” attention mechanism. Instead of relying on vector similarity alone, the modified architectures learn to incorporate the “Symbolic Similarity” as well by using the Named-Entity features of the Premise and Hypothesis sentences. The new modified architectures not only perform significantly better than the unmodified architectures on the “NER Changed” (NC) dataset but also performs as well on the existing datasets.
ContributorsShrivastava, Ishan (Author) / Baral, Chitta (Thesis advisor) / Anwar, Saadat (Committee member) / Yang, Yezhou (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019