ASU Electronic Theses and Dissertations
This collection includes most of the ASU Theses and Dissertations from 2011 to present. ASU Theses and Dissertations are available in downloadable PDF format; however, a small percentage of items are under embargo. Information about the dissertations/theses includes degree information, committee members, an abstract, supporting data or media.
In addition to the electronic theses found in the ASU Digital Repository, ASU Theses and Dissertations can be found in the ASU Library Catalog.
Dissertations and Theses granted by Arizona State University are archived and made available through a joint effort of the ASU Graduate College and the ASU Libraries. For more information or questions about this collection contact or visit the Digital Repository ETD Library Guide or contact the ASU Graduate College at gradformat@asu.edu.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
Filtering by
- Creators: Fox, Peter
Description
This study was designed to provide insight into microbial transport kinetics which might be applied to bioremediation technology development and prevention of groundwater susceptibility to pathogen contamination. Several pilot-scale experiments were conducted in a saturated, 2 dimensional, packed porous media tank to investigate the transport of Escherichia coli bacteria, P22 bacteriophage, and a visual tracer and draw comparisons and/or conclusions. A constructed tank was packed with an approximate 3,700 cubic inches (in3) of a fine grained, homogeneous, chemically inert sand which allowed for a controlled system. Sampling ports were located at 5, 15, 25, and 25 vertical inches from the base of the 39 inch saturated zone and were used to assess the transport of the selected microorganisms. Approximately 105 cells of E. coli or P22 were injected into the tank and allowed to move through the media at approximately 10.02 inches per day. Samples were collected intermittently after injection based off of an estimated sampling schedule established from the visual tracer.
The results suggest that bacteriophages pass through soil faster and with greater recovery than bacteria. P22 in the tank reservoir experienced approximately 1 log reduction after 36 hours. After 85 hours, P22 was still detected in the reservoir after experiencing a 2 log reduction from the start of the experiment. E. coli either did not reach the outlet or died before sampling, while P22 was able to be recovered. Bacterial breakthrough curves were produced for the microbial indicators and illustrate the peak concentrations found for each sampling port. For E. coli, concentrations at the 5 inch port peaked at a maximum of 5170 CFU/mL, and eventually at the 25 inch port at a maximum of 90 CFU/mL. It is presumed that E. coli might have experienced significant filtration, straining and attachment, while P22 might have experienced little adsorption and instead was transported rapidly in long distances and was able to survive for the duration of the experiment.
The results suggest that bacteriophages pass through soil faster and with greater recovery than bacteria. P22 in the tank reservoir experienced approximately 1 log reduction after 36 hours. After 85 hours, P22 was still detected in the reservoir after experiencing a 2 log reduction from the start of the experiment. E. coli either did not reach the outlet or died before sampling, while P22 was able to be recovered. Bacterial breakthrough curves were produced for the microbial indicators and illustrate the peak concentrations found for each sampling port. For E. coli, concentrations at the 5 inch port peaked at a maximum of 5170 CFU/mL, and eventually at the 25 inch port at a maximum of 90 CFU/mL. It is presumed that E. coli might have experienced significant filtration, straining and attachment, while P22 might have experienced little adsorption and instead was transported rapidly in long distances and was able to survive for the duration of the experiment.
ContributorsAcosta, Jazlyn Cauren (Author) / Abbaszadegan, Morteza (Thesis advisor) / Dahlen, Paul (Committee member) / Fox, Peter (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2017
Description
Reverse osmosis (RO) membranes are considered the most effective treatment to remove salt from water. Specifically, thin film composite (TFC) membranes are considered the gold standard for RO. Despite TFC membranes good performance, there are drawbacks to consider including: permeability-selectivity tradeoff, chlorine damage, and biofouling potential. In order to counter these drawbacks, polyamide matrixes were embedded with various nanomaterials called mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) or thin film nanocomposites (TFNs). This research investigates the use of graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (RGO) into the polyamide matrix of a TFC membrane. GO and RGO have the potential to alter the permeability-selectivity trade off by offering nanochannels for water molecules to sieve through, protect polyamide from trace amounts of chlorine, as well as increase the hydrophilicity of the membrane thereby reducing biofouling potential. This project focuses on the impacts of GO on the permeability selectivity tradeoff. The hypothesis of this work is that the permeability and selectivity of GO can be tuned by controlling the oxidation level of the material. To test this hypothesis, a range of GO materials were produced in the lab using different graphite oxidation methods. The synthesized GOs were characterized by X-ray diffraction and X-ray photoelectron microscopy to show that the spacing is a function of the GO oxygen content. From these materials, two were selected due to their optimal sheet spacing between 3.4 and 7 angstroms and embedded into desalination MMM. This work reveals that the water permeability coefficient of MMM embedded with GO and RGO increased significantly; however, that the salt permeability coefficient of the membrane also increased. Future research directions are proposed to overcome this limitation.
ContributorsInurria, Adam A (Author) / Perreault, Francois (Thesis advisor) / Fox, Peter (Thesis advisor) / Lind, Mary Laura (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2017