This collection includes most of the ASU Theses and Dissertations from 2011 to present. ASU Theses and Dissertations are available in downloadable PDF format; however, a small percentage of items are under embargo. Information about the dissertations/theses includes degree information, committee members, an abstract, supporting data or media.
In addition to the electronic theses found in the ASU Digital Repository, ASU Theses and Dissertations can be found in the ASU Library Catalog.
Dissertations and Theses granted by Arizona State University are archived and made available through a joint effort of the ASU Graduate College and the ASU Libraries. For more information or questions about this collection contact or visit the Digital Repository ETD Library Guide or contact the ASU Graduate College at gradformat@asu.edu.
Eusocial insect colonies have often been imagined as “superorganisms” exhibiting tight homeostasis at the colony level. However, colonies lack the tight spatial and organizational integration that many multicellular, unitary organisms exhibit. Precise regulation requires rapid feedback, which is often not possible when nestmates are distributed across space, making decisions asynchronously.…
Eusocial insect colonies have often been imagined as “superorganisms” exhibiting tight homeostasis at the colony level. However, colonies lack the tight spatial and organizational integration that many multicellular, unitary organisms exhibit. Precise regulation requires rapid feedback, which is often not possible when nestmates are distributed across space, making decisions asynchronously. Thus, one should expect poorer regulation in superorganisms than unitary organisms.Here, I investigate aspects of regulation in collective foraging behaviors that involve both slow and rapid feedback processes. In Chapter 2, I examine a tightly coupled system with near-instantaneous signaling: teams of weaver ants cooperating to transport massive prey items back to their nest. I discover that over an extreme range of scenarios—even up vertical surfaces—the efficiency per transporter remains constant. My results suggest that weaver ant colonies are maximizing their total intake rate by regulating the allocation of transporters among loads. This is an exception that “proves the rule;” the ant teams are recapitulating the physical integration of unitary organisms.
Next, I focus on a process with greater informational constraints, with loose temporal and spatial integration. In Chapter 3, I measure the ability of solitarily foraging Ectatomma ruidum colonies to balance their collection of protein and carbohydrates given different nutritional environments. Previous research has found that ant species can precisely collect a near-constant ratio between these two macronutrients, but I discover these studies were using flawed statistical approaches. By developing a quantitative measure of regulatory effect size, I show that colonies of E. ruidum are relatively insensitive to small differences in food source nutritional content, contrary to previously published claims.
In Chapter 4, I design an automated, micro-RFID ant tracking system to investigate how the foraging behavior of individuals integrates into colony-level nutrient collection. I discover that spatial fidelity to food resources, not individual specialization on particular nutrient types, best predicts individual forager behavior. These findings contradict previously published experiments that did not use rigorous quantitative measures of specialization and confounded the effects of task type and resource location.
