This collection includes most of the ASU Theses and Dissertations from 2011 to present. ASU Theses and Dissertations are available in downloadable PDF format; however, a small percentage of items are under embargo. Information about the dissertations/theses includes degree information, committee members, an abstract, supporting data or media.
In addition to the electronic theses found in the ASU Digital Repository, ASU Theses and Dissertations can be found in the ASU Library Catalog.
Dissertations and Theses granted by Arizona State University are archived and made available through a joint effort of the ASU Graduate College and the ASU Libraries. For more information or questions about this collection contact or visit the Digital Repository ETD Library Guide or contact the ASU Graduate College at gradformat@asu.edu.
The migratory grasshopper (Melanoplus sanguinipes) is one of the most economically important grasshoppers in the western rangelands of the United States (US), capable of causing incredible amounts of damage to crops and rangelands. While M. sanguinipes has been the focus of many research studies, areas like field nutritional physiology and…
The migratory grasshopper (Melanoplus sanguinipes) is one of the most economically important grasshoppers in the western rangelands of the United States (US), capable of causing incredible amounts of damage to crops and rangelands. While M. sanguinipes has been the focus of many research studies, areas like field nutritional physiology and ecology, and interactions between nutritional physiology and biopesticide resistance have very little research. This dissertation presents a multifaceted approach through three research-driven chapters that examine the nutritional physiology of M. sanguinipes and how it interacts with an entomopathogenic fungus for grasshopper management, as well as the challenges of using biopesticides for grasshopper management. Using the Geometric Framework for Nutrition (GFN), I established baseline macronutrient intake for M. sanguinipes, both in laboratory and field populations. Through this work, I found that field and lab populations can exhibit different protein (p) to carbohydrate (c) ratios, or Intake Targets (ITs), but that the field populations had ITs that matched the nutrients available in their environment. I also used the GFN to show that infections with the fungal entomopathogen Metarhizium robertsii DWR2009 did not alter ITs in M. sanguinipes. Although, when confined to carbohydrate- or protein-biased diets, infected grasshoppers had a slightly extended lifespan relative to grasshoppers fed balanced protein:carbohydrate diets. Interestingly, in a postmortem for the grasshopper, the fungus was only able to effectively sporulate on grasshoppers fed the 1p:1c diets, suggesting that grasshopper diet can have substantial impacts on the spread of fungal biopesticides throughout a population, in the absence of any inhibitory abiotic factors. Lastly, I examined the major barriers to fungal and microsporidian biopesticide usage in the United States, including low efficacy, thermal and environmental sensitivity, non-target effects, unregistered or restricted use, and economic or accessibility barriers. I also explored potential solutions to these challenges. This dissertation's focus on Melanoplus sanguinipes and Metarhizium roberstii Strain DWR2009, generates new information about how nutritional physiology and immunology intersect to impact M. sanguinipes performance. The methodology in each of the experimental chapters provides a framework for examining other problematic grasshopper species, by determining baseline nutritional physiology, and coupling nutrition with immunology to maximize the effectiveness of biological pesticides.
