ASU Electronic Theses and Dissertations
This collection includes most of the ASU Theses and Dissertations from 2011 to present. ASU Theses and Dissertations are available in downloadable PDF format; however, a small percentage of items are under embargo. Information about the dissertations/theses includes degree information, committee members, an abstract, supporting data or media.
In addition to the electronic theses found in the ASU Digital Repository, ASU Theses and Dissertations can be found in the ASU Library Catalog.
Dissertations and Theses granted by Arizona State University are archived and made available through a joint effort of the ASU Graduate College and the ASU Libraries. For more information or questions about this collection contact or visit the Digital Repository ETD Library Guide or contact the ASU Graduate College at gradformat@asu.edu.
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Bioinformatics
- All Subjects: Biology
Description
Immunosignature is a technology that retrieves information from the immune system. The technology is based on microarrays with peptides chosen from random sequence space. My thesis focuses on improving the Immunosignature platform and using Immunosignatures to improve diagnosis for diseases. I first contributed to the optimization of the immunosignature platform by introducing scoring metrics to select optimal parameters, considering performance as well as practicality. Next, I primarily worked on identifying a signature shared across various pathogens that can distinguish them from the healthy population. I further retrieved consensus epitopes from the disease common signature and proposed that most pathogens could share the signature by studying the enrichment of the common signature in the pathogen proteomes. Following this, I worked on studying cancer samples from different stages and correlated the immune response with whether the epitope presented by tumor is similar to the pathogen proteome. An effective immune response is defined as an antibody titer increasing followed by decrease, suggesting elimination of the epitope. I found that an effective immune response usually correlates with epitopes that are more similar to pathogens. This suggests that the immune system might occupy a limited space and can be effective against only certain epitopes that have similarity with pathogens. I then participated in the attempt to solve the antibiotic resistance problem by developing a classification algorithm that can distinguish bacterial versus viral infection. This algorithm outperforms other currently available classification methods. Finally, I worked on the concept of deriving a single number to represent all the data on the immunosignature platform. This is in resemblance to the concept of temperature, which is an approximate measurement of whether an individual is healthy. The measure of Immune Entropy was found to work best as a single measurement to describe the immune system information derived from the immunosignature. Entropy is relatively invariant in healthy population, but shows significant differences when comparing healthy donors with patients either infected with a pathogen or have cancer.
ContributorsWang, Lu (Author) / Johnston, Stephen (Thesis advisor) / Stafford, Phillip (Committee member) / Buetow, Kenneth (Committee member) / McFadden, Grant (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018
Description
Understanding changes and trends in biomedical knowledge is crucial for individuals, groups, and institutions as biomedicine improves people’s lives, supports national economies, and facilitates innovation. However, as knowledge changes what evidence illustrates knowledge changes? In the case of microbiome, a multi-dimensional concept from biomedicine, there are significant increases in publications, citations, funding, collaborations, and other explanatory variables or contextual factors. What is observed in the microbiome, or any historical evolution of a scientific field or scientific knowledge, is that these changes are related to changes in knowledge, but what is not understood is how to measure and track changes in knowledge. This investigation highlights how contextual factors from the language and social context of the microbiome are related to changes in the usage, meaning, and scientific knowledge on the microbiome. Two interconnected studies integrating qualitative and quantitative evidence examine the variation and change of the microbiome evidence are presented. First, the concepts microbiome, metagenome, and metabolome are compared to determine the boundaries of the microbiome concept in relation to other concepts where the conceptual boundaries have been cited as overlapping. A collection of publications for each concept or corpus is presented, with a focus on how to create, collect, curate, and analyze large data collections. This study concludes with suggestions on how to analyze biomedical concepts using a hybrid approach that combines results from the larger language context and individual words. Second, the results of a systematic review that describes the variation and change of microbiome research, funding, and knowledge are examined. A corpus of approximately 28,000 articles on the microbiome are characterized, and a spectrum of microbiome interpretations are suggested based on differences related to context. The collective results suggest the microbiome is a separate concept from the metagenome and metabolome, and the variation and change to the microbiome concept was influenced by contextual factors. These results provide insight into how concepts with extensive resources behave within biomedicine and suggest the microbiome is possibly representative of conceptual change or a preview of new dynamics within science that are expected in the future.
ContributorsAiello, Kenneth (Author) / Laubichler, Manfred D (Thesis advisor) / Simeone, Michael (Committee member) / Buetow, Kenneth (Committee member) / Walker, Sara I (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018
Description
In most diploid cells, autosomal genes are equally expressed from the paternal and maternal alleles resulting in biallelic expression. However, as an exception, there exists a small number of genes that show a pattern of monoallelic or biased-allele expression based on the allele’s parent-of-origin. This phenomenon is termed genomic imprinting and is an evolutionary paradox. The best explanation for imprinting is David Haig's kinship theory, which hypothesizes that monoallelic gene expression is largely the result of evolutionary conflict between males and females over maternal involvement in their offspring. One previous RNAseq study has investigated the presence of parent-of-origin effects, or imprinting, in the parasitic jewel wasp Nasonia vitripennis (N. vitripennis) and its sister species Nasonia giraulti (N. giraulti) to test the predictions of kinship theory in a non-eusocial species for comparison to a eusocial one. In order to continue to tease apart the connection between social and eusocial Hymenoptera, this study proposed a similar RNAseq study that attempted to reproduce these results in unique samples of reciprocal F1 Nasonia hybrids. Building a pseudo N. giraulti reference genome, differences were observed when aligning RNAseq reads to a N. vitripennis reference genome compared to aligning reads to a pseudo N. giraulti reference. As well, no evidence for parent-of-origin or imprinting patterns in adult Nasonia were found. These results demonstrated a species-of-origin effect. Importantly, the study continued to build a repository of support with the aim to elucidate the mechanisms behind imprinting in an excellent epigenetic model species, as it can also help with understanding the phenomenon of imprinting in complex human diseases.
ContributorsUnderwood, Avery Elizabeth (Author) / Wilson, Melissa (Thesis advisor) / Buetow, Kenneth (Committee member) / Gile, Gillian (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019
Description
Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) are strategically designed to advance novel research and integrate future professionals into the scientific community by making relevant discoveries through iteration, communication, and collaboration. With Universities also expanding online undergraduate degree programs that incorporate students who are otherwise unable to attend college, there is a demand for online asynchronous courses to train online students in authentic research, thereby leading to a more skilled, diverse, and inclusive workforce. In this case-study, a pilot CURE leveraging the data-intensive field of genomics was presented as an inclusive opportunity for asynchronous, online students to increase their research experience without having to commit to in person or extra-curricular assignments. This online CURE was designed to investigate the effects of trimming software on high-throughput sequencing data when analyzing sex differential gene expression. Project-based objectives were developed to asynchronously teach (1) the biology behind the research, (2) the coding needed to conduct the research, and (3) professional development tools to communicate research findings. Course effectiveness was evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively using weekly, open-response progress reports and an assessment administered before and after term completion. This pilot study exhibited that students can be successful in remote research experiences that incorporate channels for communication, bespoke and accessible learning materials, and open-response reports to monitor challenges and coping strategies. In this iteration, remote students demonstrated improved learning outcomes and self-reported improved confidence as researchers. In addition, students gained more realistic expectations to self-assess computational research skill-levels and self-identified adaptive coping strategies that are transferrable to future research projects. Overall, this framework for an online asynchronous CURE effectively taught students computational skills to conduct genomics research in addition to professional skills to transition to and thrive in the workforce.
ContributorsAlarid, Danielle Olga (Author) / Wilson, Melissa A (Thesis advisor) / Buetow, Kenneth (Committee member) / Cooper, Katelyn (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023
Description
Evolutionary theory provides a rich framework for understanding cancer dynamics across scales of biological organization. The field of cancer evolution has largely been divided into two domains, comparative oncology - the study of cancer across the tree of life, and tumor evolution. This work provides a theoretical framework to unify these subfields with the intent that an understanding of the evolutionary dynamics driving cancer risk at one scale can inform the understanding of the dynamics on another scale. The evolution of multicellular life and the unique vulnerabilities in the cellular mechanisms that underpin it explain the ubiquity of cancer prevalence across the tree of life. The breakdown in cellular cooperation and communication that were required for multicellular life define the hallmarks of cancer. As divergent life histories drove speciation events, it similarly drove divergences in fundamental cancer risk across species. An understanding of the impact that species’ life history theory has on the underlying network of multicellular cooperation and somatic evolution allows for robust predictions on cross-species cancer risk. A large-scale veterinary cancer database is utilized to validate many of the predictions on cancer risk made from life history evolution. Changing scales to the cellular level, it lays predictions on the fate of somatic mutations and the fitness benefits they confer to neoplastic cells compared to their healthy counterparts. The cancer hallmarks, far more than just a way to unify the many seemingly unique pathologies defined as cancer, is a powerful toolset to understand how specific mutations may change the fitness of somatic cells throughout carcinogenesis and tumor progression. Alongside highlighting the significant advances in evolutionary approaches to cancer across scales, this work provides a lucid confirmation that an understanding of both scales provides the most complete portrait of evolutionary cancer dynamics.
ContributorsCompton, Zachary Taylor (Author) / Maley, Carlo C. (Thesis advisor) / Aktipis, Athena (Committee member) / Buetow, Kenneth (Committee member) / Nedelcu, Aurora (Committee member) / Compton, Carolyn (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023