ASU Electronic Theses and Dissertations
This collection includes most of the ASU Theses and Dissertations from 2011 to present. ASU Theses and Dissertations are available in downloadable PDF format; however, a small percentage of items are under embargo. Information about the dissertations/theses includes degree information, committee members, an abstract, supporting data or media.
In addition to the electronic theses found in the ASU Digital Repository, ASU Theses and Dissertations can be found in the ASU Library Catalog.
Dissertations and Theses granted by Arizona State University are archived and made available through a joint effort of the ASU Graduate College and the ASU Libraries. For more information or questions about this collection contact or visit the Digital Repository ETD Library Guide or contact the ASU Graduate College at gradformat@asu.edu.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Silent Data Corruption
- Creators: Shrivastava, Aviral
Description
Advances in semiconductor technology have brought computer-based systems intovirtually all aspects of human life. This unprecedented integration of semiconductor based systems in our lives has significantly increased the domain and the number
of safety-critical applications – application with unacceptable consequences of failure. Software-level error resilience schemes are attractive because they can provide commercial-off-the-shelf microprocessors with adaptive and scalable reliability.
Among all software-level error resilience solutions, in-application instruction replication based approaches have been widely used and are deemed to be the most effective. However, existing instruction-based replication schemes only protect some part of computations i.e. arithmetic and logical instructions and leave the rest as unprotected. To improve the efficacy of instruction-level redundancy-based approaches, we developed several error detection and error correction schemes. nZDC (near Zero silent
Data Corruption) is an instruction duplication scheme which protects the execution of whole application. Rather than detecting errors on register operands of memory and control flow operations, nZDC checks the results of such operations. nZDC en
sures the correct execution of memory write instruction by reloading stored value and checking it against redundantly computed value. nZDC also introduces a novel control flow checking mechanism which replicates compare and branch instructions and
detects both wrong direction branches as well as unwanted jumps. Fault injection experiments show that nZDC can improve the error coverage of the state-of-the-art schemes by more than 10x, without incurring any more performance penalty. Further
more, we introduced two error recovery solutions. InCheck is our backward recovery solution which makes light-weighted error-free checkpoints at the basic block granularity. In the case of error, InCheck reverts the program execution to the beginning of last executed basic block and resumes the execution by the aid of preserved in formation. NEMESIS is our forward recovery scheme which runs three versions of computation and detects errors by checking the results of all memory write and branch
operations. In the case of a mismatch, NEMESIS diagnosis routine decides if the error is recoverable. If yes, NEMESIS recovery routine reverts the effect of error from the program state and resumes program normal execution from the error detection
point.
of safety-critical applications – application with unacceptable consequences of failure. Software-level error resilience schemes are attractive because they can provide commercial-off-the-shelf microprocessors with adaptive and scalable reliability.
Among all software-level error resilience solutions, in-application instruction replication based approaches have been widely used and are deemed to be the most effective. However, existing instruction-based replication schemes only protect some part of computations i.e. arithmetic and logical instructions and leave the rest as unprotected. To improve the efficacy of instruction-level redundancy-based approaches, we developed several error detection and error correction schemes. nZDC (near Zero silent
Data Corruption) is an instruction duplication scheme which protects the execution of whole application. Rather than detecting errors on register operands of memory and control flow operations, nZDC checks the results of such operations. nZDC en
sures the correct execution of memory write instruction by reloading stored value and checking it against redundantly computed value. nZDC also introduces a novel control flow checking mechanism which replicates compare and branch instructions and
detects both wrong direction branches as well as unwanted jumps. Fault injection experiments show that nZDC can improve the error coverage of the state-of-the-art schemes by more than 10x, without incurring any more performance penalty. Further
more, we introduced two error recovery solutions. InCheck is our backward recovery solution which makes light-weighted error-free checkpoints at the basic block granularity. In the case of error, InCheck reverts the program execution to the beginning of last executed basic block and resumes the execution by the aid of preserved in formation. NEMESIS is our forward recovery scheme which runs three versions of computation and detects errors by checking the results of all memory write and branch
operations. In the case of a mismatch, NEMESIS diagnosis routine decides if the error is recoverable. If yes, NEMESIS recovery routine reverts the effect of error from the program state and resumes program normal execution from the error detection
point.
ContributorsDidehban, Moslem (Author) / Shrivastava, Aviral (Thesis advisor) / Wu, Carole-Jean (Committee member) / Clark, Lawrence (Committee member) / Mahlke, Scott (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018
Description
Soft errors are considered as a key reliability challenge for sub-nano scale transistors. An ideal solution for such a challenge should ultimately eliminate the effect of soft errors from the microprocessor. While forward recovery techniques achieve fast recovery from errors by simply voting out the wrong values, they incur the overhead of three copies execution. Backward recovery techniques only need two copies of execution, but suffer from check-pointing overhead.
In this work I explored the efficiency of integrating check-pointing into the application and the effectiveness of recovery that can be performed upon it. After evaluating the available fine-grained approaches to perform recovery, I am introducing InCheck, an in-application recovery scheme that can be integrated into instruction-duplication based techniques, thus providing a fast error recovery. The proposed technique makes light-weight checkpoints at the basic-block granularity, and uses them for recovery purposes.
To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed technique, 10,000 fault injection experiments were performed on different hardware components of a modern ARM in-order simulated processor. InCheck was able to recover from all detected errors by replaying about 20 instructions, however, the state of the art recovery scheme failed more than 200 times.
In this work I explored the efficiency of integrating check-pointing into the application and the effectiveness of recovery that can be performed upon it. After evaluating the available fine-grained approaches to perform recovery, I am introducing InCheck, an in-application recovery scheme that can be integrated into instruction-duplication based techniques, thus providing a fast error recovery. The proposed technique makes light-weight checkpoints at the basic-block granularity, and uses them for recovery purposes.
To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed technique, 10,000 fault injection experiments were performed on different hardware components of a modern ARM in-order simulated processor. InCheck was able to recover from all detected errors by replaying about 20 instructions, however, the state of the art recovery scheme failed more than 200 times.
ContributorsLokam, Sai Ram Dheeraj (Author) / Shrivastava, Aviral (Thesis advisor) / Clark, Lawrence T (Committee member) / Mubayi, Anuj (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2016