ASU Electronic Theses and Dissertations
This collection includes most of the ASU Theses and Dissertations from 2011 to present. ASU Theses and Dissertations are available in downloadable PDF format; however, a small percentage of items are under embargo. Information about the dissertations/theses includes degree information, committee members, an abstract, supporting data or media.
In addition to the electronic theses found in the ASU Digital Repository, ASU Theses and Dissertations can be found in the ASU Library Catalog.
Dissertations and Theses granted by Arizona State University are archived and made available through a joint effort of the ASU Graduate College and the ASU Libraries. For more information or questions about this collection contact or visit the Digital Repository ETD Library Guide or contact the ASU Graduate College at gradformat@asu.edu.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
Filtering by
- All Subjects: equity distribution degree
- All Subjects: investor behavior
- Creators: Shen, Wei
Description
In accordance with the Principal Agent Theory, Property Right Theory, Incentive Theory, and Human Capital Theory, firms face agency problems due to “separation of ownership and management”, which call for effective corporate governance. Ownership structure is a core element of the corporate governance. The differences in ownership structures thus may result in differential incentives in governance through the selection of senior management and in the design of senior management compensation system. This thesis investigates four firms with four different types of ownership structures: a public listed firm with the controlling interest by the state, a public listed firm with a non-state-owned controlling interest, a public listed firm a family-owned controlling interest, and a Sino-foreign joint venture firm. By using a case study approach, I focus on two dimensions of ownership structure characteristics – ownership diversification and differences in property rights so as to document whether there are systematic differences in governance participation and executive compensation design. Specifically, I focused on whether such differences are reflected in management selection (which is linked to adverse selection and moral hazard problems) and in compensation design (the choices of performance measurements, performance pay, and in stock option or restricted stock). The results are consistent with my expectation – the nature of ownership structure does affect senior management compensation design. Policy implications are discussed accordingly.
ContributorsGao, Shenghua (Author) / Pei, Ker-Wei (Thesis advisor) / Li, Feng (Committee member) / Shen, Wei (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015
Description
After the 2008 financial crisis, along with information technology and its application
innovation into the burst period, Shared faster economic growth, and then entered into a
rapid expansion in 2014, quickly penetrate into many areas and market segments.
As the securities industry practitioners and Internet financial practitioners, I am
very concerned about sharing economic model in the development of securities
investment niche. As the Internet and mobile penetration rate rise in recent years, the
Internet financial in the rapid development of our country, investors get used for
investment decision-making information via the Internet. Internet social investment
sharing platform based on knowledge sharing and rapid development, has formed
"opinion leaders", "combined with", "automated financial innovation model". The
emergence of these new patterns, provide investors with investment of knowledge sharing,
the investors behavior changes, many small and medium-sized investors into social
sharing platform for the combination of investment talent information and follow orders,
and centered on investment talent view form fan interaction.
This article around the "Shared economic environment on the impact of portfolio
share on investor behavior research," the theme, the relevant literature and resources, and
to detect Shared economic environment provided by the social share portfolio, whether to
change the traditional information decision and disadvantages of small and medium-sized
investors, whether really improved the small and medium-sized investors return on
investment, its conclusion try to explain the traditional period research literature on active
investment and passive investment, the relevant conclusions of small and medium-sized
investors and institutional investors, sharing in the Internet the rapid development of
economic period is changed.
innovation into the burst period, Shared faster economic growth, and then entered into a
rapid expansion in 2014, quickly penetrate into many areas and market segments.
As the securities industry practitioners and Internet financial practitioners, I am
very concerned about sharing economic model in the development of securities
investment niche. As the Internet and mobile penetration rate rise in recent years, the
Internet financial in the rapid development of our country, investors get used for
investment decision-making information via the Internet. Internet social investment
sharing platform based on knowledge sharing and rapid development, has formed
"opinion leaders", "combined with", "automated financial innovation model". The
emergence of these new patterns, provide investors with investment of knowledge sharing,
the investors behavior changes, many small and medium-sized investors into social
sharing platform for the combination of investment talent information and follow orders,
and centered on investment talent view form fan interaction.
This article around the "Shared economic environment on the impact of portfolio
share on investor behavior research," the theme, the relevant literature and resources, and
to detect Shared economic environment provided by the social share portfolio, whether to
change the traditional information decision and disadvantages of small and medium-sized
investors, whether really improved the small and medium-sized investors return on
investment, its conclusion try to explain the traditional period research literature on active
investment and passive investment, the relevant conclusions of small and medium-sized
investors and institutional investors, sharing in the Internet the rapid development of
economic period is changed.
ContributorsMa, Gang (Author) / Gu, Bin (Thesis advisor) / Yan, Hong (Thesis advisor) / Shen, Wei (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2017