Matching Items (8)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

284-Thumbnail Image.jpg
Description

This brief summarizes the different types of food stores open in Trenton, New Jersey and in a one mile radius around the city during 2008 to 2014.

Description

Many factors influence children’s health behaviors and health outcomes. The Social Ecological Model (SEM) groups these factors into interactive layers, creating a framework for understanding their influence and for designing interventions to achieve positive change. The layers of influence in the SEM include individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and policy factors

Many factors influence children’s health behaviors and health outcomes. The Social Ecological Model (SEM) groups these factors into interactive layers, creating a framework for understanding their influence and for designing interventions to achieve positive change. The layers of influence in the SEM include individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and policy factors (see figure). The New Jersey Child Health Study (NJCHS) was designed to examine how specific layers of the SEM, particularly food and physical activity environments in schools and communities, affect obesity outcomes in children

ContributorsOhri-Vachaspati, Punam (Contributor) / Eliason, Jessica (Contributor) / Yedidia, Michael J., 1946- (Contributor) / New Jersey Child Health Study (Contributor) / Rutgers Center for State Health Policy (Contributor) / ASU College of Health Solutions (Contributor)
Created2019-10
Description

Many factors influence children’s health behaviors and health outcomes. The Social Ecological Model (SEM) groups these factors into interactive layers, creating a framework for understanding their influence and for designing interventions to achieve positive change. The layers of influence in the SEM include individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and policy factors.

ContributorsOhri-Vachaspati, Punam (Contributor) / Yedidia, Michael J., 1946- (Contributor) / New Jersey Child Health Study (Contributor, Contributor) / Stevens, Clinton (Contributor) / Rutgers Center for State Health Policy (Contributor) / ASU College of Health Solutions (Contributor)
Created2019-10
283-Thumbnail Image.jpg
Description

This brief summarizes the different types of food stores open in Camden, New Jersey and in a one mile radius around the city during 2008 to 2014.

285-Thumbnail Image.jpg
Description

This brief summarizes the different types of food stores open in New Brunswick, New Jersey and in a one mile radius around the city during 2008 to 2014.

282-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

This brief summarizes the different types of food stores open in Newark, New Jersey and in a one mile radius around the city during 2008 to 2014.

129704-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

Pay-for-performance (PFP) is a relatively new approach to agricultural conservation that attaches an incentive payment to quantified reductions in nutrient runoff from a participating farm. Similar to a payment for ecosystem services approach, PFP lends itself to providing incentives for the most beneficial practices at the field level. To date,

Pay-for-performance (PFP) is a relatively new approach to agricultural conservation that attaches an incentive payment to quantified reductions in nutrient runoff from a participating farm. Similar to a payment for ecosystem services approach, PFP lends itself to providing incentives for the most beneficial practices at the field level. To date, PFP conservation in the U.S. has only been applied in small pilot programs. Because monitoring conservation performance for each field enrolled in a program would be cost-prohibitive, field-level modeling can provide cost-effective estimates of anticipated improvements in nutrient runoff. We developed a PFP system that uses a unique application of one of the leading agricultural models, the USDA's Soil and Water Assessment Tool, to evaluate the nutrient load reductions of potential farm practice changes based on field-level agronomic and management data. The initial phase of the project focused on simulating individual fields in the River Raisin watershed in southeastern Michigan. Here we present development of the modeling approach and results from the pilot year, 2015-2016. These results stress that (1) there is variability in practice effectiveness both within and between farms, and thus there is not one "best practice" for all farms, (2) conservation decisions are made most effectively at the scale of the farm field rather than the sub-watershed or watershed level, and (3) detailed, field-level management information is needed to accurately model and manage on-farm nutrient loadings.

ContributorsMuenich, Rebecca (Author) / Kalcic, M. M. (Author) / Winsten, J. (Author) / Fisher, K. (Author) / Day, M. (Author) / O'Neil, G. (Author) / Wang, Y.-C. (Author) / Scavia, D. (Author) / Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering (Contributor)
Created2017