Filtering by
- Status: Published
Cities in the Global South face rapid urbanization challenges and often suffer an acute lack of infrastructure and governance capacities. Smart Cities Mission, in India, launched in 2015, aims to offer a novel approach for urban renewal of 100 cities following an area‐based development approach, where the use of ICT and digital technologies is particularly emphasized. This article presents a critical review of the design and implementation framework of this new urban renewal program across selected case‐study cities. The article examines the claims of the so‐called “smart cities” against actual urban transformation on‐ground and evaluates how “inclusive” and “sustainable” these developments are. We quantify the scale and coverage of the smart city urban renewal projects in the cities to highlight who the program includes and excludes. The article also presents a statistical analysis of the sectoral focus and budgetary allocations of the projects under the Smart Cities Mission to find an inherent bias in these smart city initiatives in terms of which types of development they promote and the ones it ignores. The findings indicate that a predominant emphasis on digital urban renewal of selected precincts and enclaves, branded as “smart cities,” leads to deepening social polarization and gentrification. The article offers crucial urban planning lessons for designing ICT‐driven urban renewal projects, while addressing critical questions around inclusion and sustainability in smart city ventures.`
Data from the ASU Arizona Insulin Registry (AIR) registry and the USC Study of Latino Adolescents at Risk for diabetes project were used to test the cross-sectional and prospective utility of novel biomarkers to identify youth at risk for type 2 diabetes. Pediatric and adult data from the ASU AIR registry were assessed to examine the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with type 2 diabetes risk. Three KCNQ1 SNPs (rs151290; rs2237892; rs2237895) were examined as novel genetic variants for type 2 diabetes in Latinos.
Latino youth with a biphasic response in the AIR registry exhibited significantly better β-cell function (P < 0.05) compared to youth with a monophasic response. Additionally, Latino youth with a 1-hr glucose ≥155 mg/dL exhibited a significantly greater decline in β-cell function over 8 years compared with the <155 mg/dL group (β=-327.8±126.2, P = 0.01). Moreover, a 1-hr glucose ≥155 mg/dL was associated with a 2.5 times greater risk for developing prediabetes over time (P = 0.0001). 1-hr glucose was the most powerful predictor of prediabetes (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve=0.73) when compared to the traditional biomarkers including HbA1c (0.58), fasting (0.67), and 2-hr glucose (0.64). Two KCNQ1 SNPs (rs151290 and rs2237892) exhibited significant associations with type 2 diabetes risk factors. For the novel glycemic markers, 15 SNPs were associated with the glucose response curve, while 18 SNPs were associated with 1-hr glucose.
These data suggest that glucose response curve and 1-hr glucose during an OGTT independently differentiate type 2 diabetes risk among Latino youth. Furthermore, it was successful to replicate the association of type 2 diabetes risk with 2 KCNQ1 SNPs in a Latino population. Data suggest that novel glycemic biomarkers are influenced by genetic background in this high-risk population.
Background: Healthy individuals on the lower end of the insulin sensitivity spectrum also have a reduced gene expression response to exercise for specific genes. The goal of this study was to determine the relationship between insulin sensitivity and exercise-induced gene expression in an unbiased, global manner.
Methods and Findings: Euglycemic clamps were used to measure insulin sensitivity and muscle biopsies were done at rest and 30 minutes after a single acute exercise bout in 14 healthy participants. Changes in mRNA expression were assessed using microarrays, and miRNA analysis was performed in a subset of 6 of the participants using sequencing techniques. Following exercise, 215 mRNAs were changed at the probe level (Bonferroni-corrected P<0.00000115). Pathway and Gene Ontology analysis showed enrichment in MAP kinase signaling, transcriptional regulation and DNA binding. Changes in several transcription factor mRNAs were correlated with insulin sensitivity, including MYC, r=0.71; SNF1LK, r=0.69; and ATF3, r= 0.61 (5 corrected for false discovery rate). Enrichment in the 5’-UTRs of exercise-responsive genes suggested regulation by common transcription factors, especially EGR1. miRNA species of interest that changed after exercise included miR-378, which is located in an intron of the PPARGC1B gene.
Conclusions: These results indicate that transcription factor gene expression responses to exercise depend highly on insulin sensitivity in healthy people. The overall pattern suggests a coordinated cycle by which exercise and insulin sensitivity regulate gene expression in muscle.