Currently, autonomous vehicles are being evaluated by how well they interact with humans without evaluating how well humans interact with them. Since people are not going to unanimously switch over to using autonomous vehicles, attention must be given to how well these new vehicles signal intent to human drivers from the driver’s point of view. Ineffective communication will lead to unnecessary discomfort among drivers caused by an underlying uncertainty about what an autonomous vehicle is or isn’t about to do. Recent studies suggest that humans tend to fixate on areas of higher uncertainty so scenarios that have a higher number of vehicle fixations can be reasoned to be more uncertain. We provide a framework for measuring human uncertainty and use the framework to measure the effect of empathetic vs non-empathetic agents. We used a simulated driving environment to create recorded scenarios and manipulate the autonomous vehicle to include either an empathetic or non-empathetic agent. The driving interaction is composed of two vehicles approaching an uncontrolled intersection. These scenarios were played to twelve participants while their gaze was recorded to track what the participants were fixating on. The overall intent was to provide an analytical framework as a tool for evaluating autonomous driving features; and in this case, we choose to evaluate how effective it was for vehicles to have empathetic behaviors included in the autonomous vehicle decision making. A t-test analysis of the gaze indicated that empathy did not in fact reduce uncertainty although additional testing of this hypothesis will be needed due to the small sample size.
As smart home devices become more common in households across the globe, it is<br/>surprising that companies who specialize in IoT devices have not exploited the world of swimming<br/>pools. As a pool owner and avid IoT user, it has become increasingly obvious to me that such<br/>devices are necessary. Thus, I have developed an embedded system – connected to a web-based<br/>reporting system – that accurately reports common chemical levels of a swimming pool. In<br/>addition, this system includes an autofill function with information about the amount of water<br/>dispensed. This system gives pool owners access to an all-in-one device that can be used on any<br/>pool, new or old. Future implementations include a personalized application to display the pool<br/>levels and user-defined suggestions when certain levels become too high or low.
Designing these agents to cover every case of human interaction is difficult, and usually
imperfect, as human players are capable of learning to overcome these agents in unintended
ways. Artificial intelligence is a growing field that seeks to solve problems by simulating
learning in specific environments. The aim of this paper is to explore the applications that the
self play learning branch of artificial intelligence may pose on game development in the future,
and to attempt to implement a working version of a self play agent learning to play a Pokemon
battle. Originally designed Pokemon battle behavior is often suboptimal, getting stuck making
ineffective or incorrect choices, so training a self play model to learn the strategy and structure of
Pokemon battles from a clean slate would result in an organic agent that would outperform the
original behavior of the computer controlled agents. Though unsuccessful in my implementation,
this paper serves as a record of the exploration of this field, and a log of what worked and what
did not, in order to benefit any future person interested in the same topics.
Since it doesn’t hurt to attempt to utilize feature extracted values to improve a model (if things don’t work out, one can always use their original features), the question may arise: how could the results of feature extraction on values such as sentiment affect a model’s ability to predict the movement of the stock market? This paper attempts to shine some light on to what the answer could be by deriving TextBlob sentiment values from Twitter data, and using Granger Causality Tests and logistic and linear regression to test if there exist a correlation or causation between the stock market and features extracted from public sentiment.