Matching Items (113)
Description
With opioid use disorder (OUD) being an epidemic, it is important to investigate the mechanisms as to why this is so. This study established a self-administration paradigm to model and investigate the mechanisms of polysubstance, sequential use in conjunction with the analysis of withdrawal symptomatology driven by opioid withdrawal. The independent variables were dichotomized into the control group (food/cocaine) and the experimental group (oxycodone/cocaine). We hypothesized that more cocaine would be self-administered on the first day of oxycodone withdrawal. In addition, we hypothesized that somatic signs of withdrawal would increase at 16 hours post-oxycodone self-administration. Finally, we hypothesized that cocaine intake during oxycodone withdrawal would potentiate subsequent oxycodone self-administration. Our findings revealed that animals readily discriminated between the active (food or oxycodone) and inactive levers - but will however require more animals to achieve the appropriate power. Further, the average cocaine infusions across phases exhibited significance between the oxycodone/cocaine and food/cocaine group, with the average cocaine infusions being lower in food than in oxycodone-experienced animals. This implies that the exacerbation of the sequential co-use pattern in this case yields an increase in cocaine infusions that may be driven by oxycodone withdrawal. Further, to characterize withdrawal from oxycodone self-administration, somatic signs were examined at either 0 or 16 hrs following completion of oxycodone self-administration. The oxycodone/cocaine group exhibited significantly lower body temperature at 16 hrs of oxycodone withdrawal compared to 0 hrs. No differences in somatic signs of withdrawal in the food/cocaine group was found between the two timepoints. Oxycodone withdrawal was not found to potentiate any subsequent self-administration of oxycodone. Future research is needed to uncover neurobiological underpinnings of motivated polysubstance use in order to discover novel pharmacotherapeutic treatments to decrease co-use of drugs of abuse. Overall, this study is of importance as it is the first to establish a working preclinical model of a clinically-relevant pattern of polysubstance use. By doing so, it enables an exceptional opportunity to examine co-use in a highly-controlled setting.
ContributorsUlangkaya, Hanaa Corsino (Author) / Gipson-Reichardt, Cassandra (Thesis director) / Olive, M. Foster (Committee member) / Department of Psychology (Contributor) / School of Life Sciences (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2020-05
Description
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive cognitive and behavior disorder that is characterized by the deposition of extracellular Aβ plaques, intracellular neurofibrillary tangles, and neuroinflammation. Aβ is generated by cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) by β-secretase (BACE1) and, subsequently, y- secretase. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in studying and understanding inflammation as a therapeutic target for AD. Inflammation manifests in the brain in the form of activated microglia and astrocytes. These cells are able to release high levels of inflammatory cytokines such as Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α). TNF-α is a major cytokine, which is involved in early inflammatory events and plays a role in the progression of AD pathology. There are currently no treatments that target chronic neuroinflammation. However, previous work in our laboratory with transgenic mice modeling AD suggested that the anti-cancer drug lenalidomide could lower neuroinflammation and slow AD progression, though the cellular and molecular mechanisms are yet to be elucidated. Here we hypothesized that lenalidomide can modulate TNF-α production in microglia and decrease amyloidogenesis. Using immortal cell lines mimicking several brain cell types, we discovered that lenalidomide is likely to decrease inflammation by modulating microglia cells rather than neurons or astrocytes. In addition, the drug may prevent the overexpression of BACE1 upon inflammation, thus blocking the overproduction of Aβ. If confirmed, these results could lead to a better understanding of how inflammation regulates Aβ synthesis and provide novel cellular and molecular therapeutic targets to control the progression AD.
ContributorsGujju, Manasa (Author) / DeCourt, Boris (Thesis director) / Olive, M. Foster (Committee member) / Department of Psychology (Contributor) / School of Life Sciences (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2018-05
Description
Approximately 248 million people in the world are currently living with chronic Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. HBV and HCV infections are the primary cause of liver diseases such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinomas in the world with an estimated 1.4 million deaths annually. HBV in the Republic of Peru was used as a case study of an emerging and rapidly spreading disease in a developing nation. Wherein, clinical diagnosis of HBV infections in at-risk communities such the Amazon Region and the Andes Mountains are challenging due to a myriad of reasons. High prices of clinical diagnosis and limited access to treatment are alone the most significant deterrent for individuals living in at-risk communities to get the much need help. Additionally, limited testing facilities, lack of adequate testing policies or national guidelines, poor laboratory capacity, resource-limited settings, geographical isolation, and public mistrust are among the chief reasons for low HBV testing. Although, preventative vaccination programs deployed by the Peruvian health officials have reduced the number of infected individuals by year and region. To significantly reduce or eradicate HBV in hyperendemic areas and countries such as Peru, preventative clinical diagnosis and vaccination programs are an absolute necessity. Consequently, the need for a portable low-priced diagnostic platform for the detection of HBV and other diseases is substantial and urgent not only in Peru but worldwide. Some of these concerns were addressed by designing a low-cost, rapid detection platform. In that, an immunosignature technology (IMST) slide used to test for reactivity against the presence of antibodies in the serum-sample was used to test for picture resolution and clarity. IMST slides were scanned using a smartphone camera placed on top of the designed device housing a circuit of 32 LED lights at 647 nm, an optical magnifier at 15X, and a linear polarizing film sheet. Tow 9V batteries powered the scanning device LED circuit ensuring enough lighting. The resulting pictures from the first prototype showed that by lighting the device at 647 nm and using a smartphone camera, the camera could capture high-resolution images. These results conclusively indicate that with any modern smartphone camera, a small box lighted to 647 nm, and optical magnifier; a powerful and expensive laboratory scanning machine can be replaced by another that is inexpensive, portable and ready to use anywhere.
ContributorsMakimaa, Heyde (Author) / Holechek, Susan (Thesis director) / Stafford, Phillip (Committee member) / Jayasuriya, Suren (Committee member) / School of Life Sciences (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2018-05
Description
Nicotine addiction remains a prevalent public health issue, and the FDA has released a statement outlining the systematic reduction of nicotine to non-zero levels in the coming years. Current research has not yet established the effects of abrupt nicotine dose reduction on vulnerability to relapse, nor has abrupt nicotine dose reduction been evaluated in terms of behavioral economic characteristics of demand and elasticity been evaluated for reduced doses of nicotine. Using a rat model, we first evaluated the comparability of between- and within-session protocols for establishing characteristics of demand and elasticity for nicotine to shorten experimental timelines for this study and future studies. We then tested environmental enrichment and sex as factors of elasticity of demand for nicotine. Using a rat model of relapse to cues, we also examined the effects of nicotine dose-reduction on vulnerability to relapse. We found differences in maximum consumption and demand between the between- and within-session protocols, as well as sex differences in elasticity of demand on the within-session protocol where male demand was more elastic than female demand. Additionally, we found that enrichment significantly increased elasticity of demand for nicotine for both males and females. Finally, preliminary analyses revealed that nicotine dose reduction yields more inelastic demand and higher maximum consumption, and these outcomes predict increased time to extinction of the association between nicotine and contingent cues, and increased rates of relapse. These studies highlight the usefulness and validity of within-session protocols, and also illustrate the necessity for rigorous testing of forced dose reduction on nicotine vulnerability.
ContributorsCabrera-Brown, Gabriella Paula (Author) / Gipson-Reichardt, Cassandra (Thesis director) / Olive, M. Foster (Committee member) / Davis, Mary (Committee member) / Sanford School of Social and Family Dynamics (Contributor) / Department of Psychology (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2017-12
Description
In an increasingly interconnected world, the 17 Sustainable Development Goals are the United Nations’ framework for ensuring we continue to transform our world for the better, leaving no population behind. This study examines how the terminology of Sustainable Development Goal 17 for global partnership affects its implementation, focusing on “building capacity”—a widely referenced target in the development arena—and the involvement of the private sector. Key informant interviews with experts in the fields of conflict of interest, ethics, and development revealed a wide variety of (often conflicting) notions about partnership, frameworks for capacity development, and the interactions between public and private actors. A literature review of key policy documents examined the terminology and implementation of multistakeholder partnerships, and analysis offered considerations for risks and suggestions in policy terminology. Results indicate a need for increased attention to the use of partnership terminology as a catch-all term to encompass development work, and makes several recommendations for changes to combat misuse of the partnership label. Finally, this study acknowledges that there is a continued need for research-based evidence for effectiveness of the partnership-based development approach.
ContributorsThomson, Azalea Mae (Author) / Gaughan, Monica (Thesis director) / Hruschka, Daniel (Committee member) / School of Human Evolution and Social Change (Contributor) / School of Life Sciences (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2018-05
Description
Monoclonal antibody therapy focuses on engineering immune cells to target specific peptide sequences indicative of disease. An impediment in the continued advancement of this market is the lack of an efficient, inexpensive means of characterization that can be broadly applied to any antibody while still providing high-density data. Many characterization methods address an antibody's affinity for its cognate sequence but overlook other important aspects of binding behavior such as off-target binding interactions. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate how the binding intensity between an antibody and a library of random-sequence peptides, otherwise known as an immunosignature, can be evaluated to determine antibody specificity and polyreactivity. A total of 24 commercially available monoclonal antibodies were assayed on 125K and 330K peptide microarrays and analyzed using a motif clustering program to predict candidate epitopes within each antigen sequence. The results support the further development of immunosignaturing as an antibody characterization tool that is relevant to both therapeutic and non-therapeutic antibodies.
ContributorsDai, Jennifer T. (Author) / Stafford, Phillip (Thesis director) / Diehnelt, Chris (Committee member) / School of Life Sciences (Contributor) / W.P. Carey School of Business (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2018-05
Description
The development of safe and effective vaccines has been one of the greatest public achievements of the 20th century. However, there is still considerable public debate about the relative health costs and benefits of vaccines, and the information and misinformation spread through these debates can have a direct impact on vaccination and whether or not herd immunity will continue in the United States for different diseases. To understand perceptions of vaccine risks and effectiveness among young adults in the U.S., this study describes Arizona State University students' perceptions of the harms and benefits of vaccines. A preliminary free list (n=30) identified what vaccines ASU college students were most likely to recall spontaneously. The six vaccines most commonly mentioned by ASU students were: influenza (flu), chickenpox, HPV, polio, MMR, and smallpox. Using these top six vaccines, we then developed a second survey about the knowledge and perceptions of each of these vaccines and vaccines as a whole. We found that students generally perceived vaccines as safe and important to their health, but they maintained an overall lack of understanding of how vaccines work and what they protect against. While this study is only a preliminary investigation into the perceptions of ASU college students on six commonly mentioned vaccines, this could lead to investigations on how to educate and promote the usage of vaccines to college students.
ContributorsGilson, Jacob (Co-author) / Sutton, Carly (Co-author) / Hruschka, Daniel (Thesis director) / Ruth, Alissa (Committee member) / W. P. Carey School of Business (Contributor) / School of Human Evolution and Social Change (Contributor) / School of Life Sciences (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2017-12
Description
A major recurring issue with aid-providing nonprofit organizations is the lack of accountability to recipients. In many cases, there are not clear-cut ways of measuring the efficiency or effectiveness of aid or to determine when and how the aid is failing to meet the needs of recipients. This study focused on one particular non-governmental organization, Project C.U.R.E., that provides medical aid to developing countries in the form of devices and equipment. It investigated the causes of misalignments observed in Project C.U.R.E.'s medical aid process, specifically with three loads that were shipped to the Ahwiaa, Akoti, Bassengele, Chirano, Humjibre, Ntrentrenso, Paboase, and Wenchi clinics as well as the Bibiani hospital in Ghana between June 2015 and May 2016. The medical aid donation process was observed at the each of its steps. Data was collected through interviews with Project C.U.R.E. employees and associates, and was organized and analyzed using Lean Six Sigma tools in order to find areas where the process broke down or failed. These tools included process mapping, root cause analysis through the use of Pareto charts and process failure mode and effects analysis (PFMEA). Once all of the issues from the shipment were categorized, it was found that the three most common types of issues were the preparation of the device being unclear or being unloaded incorrectly, power issues, and misalignment in terms training, needs, and infrastructure. The PFMEAs identified high-priority issues with missing fields in the Needs Assessment Booklet in the needs assessment step, misaligned products in terms of power availability in the planning step, and a lack of standardization in the warehouse operations step. 50 unique solutions were brainstormed in order to address these issues, as well as others. This means that Lean Six Sigma tools such as Pareto charts and PFMEA can be used to identify problems, identify causes and effects of problems, and help to produce solutions to the identified problems. In the future, more in-depth research into Project C.U.R.E.'s impact evaluation process could be pursued.
ContributorsFisk, Nicole Diane (Author) / Hruschka, Daniel (Thesis director) / Walters, Danielle (Committee member) / School of Human Evolution and Social Change (Contributor) / Harrington Bioengineering Program (Contributor, Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2016-12
Description
In this project, biochemical characteristics of peptide binding agents, synthetic antibodies or synbodies, were examined with respect to the capture efficiency and specific binding ability to norovirus. Norovirus, although generally not a deadly pathogen, is the most common cause of acute gastroenteritis and outbreaks present a large social and financial burden to the healthcare and food service industries. With Dr. Diehnelt's laboratory group, a platform has been developed that enables us to rapidly construct peptide-based affinity ligands that can be characterized for binding to norovirus. The design needed to display clear results, be simple to operate, and be inexpensive to produce and use. Four synbodies, originally engineered with a specificity to the GII.4 Minerva genotype were tested with different virus strains varying in similarity to the GII.4 Minerva between 43% and 95.4%. Initial assays utilized norovirus-like particles to qualitatively compare the capture efficiency of the different synbodies without utilizing limited resources. To quantify the amount of actual virus captured by the synbodies, western blots with RT-PCR and RT-qPCR were utilized. The results indicated the synbodies were able to enrich the dilute solutions of the different noroviruses utilizing a magnetic bead pull-down assay. The capture efficiencies of the synbodies were comparable to currently utilized binding agents such as aptamers and porcine gastric mucine magnetic beads. This thesis presents data collected over nearly two years of research at the Center for Innovations in Medicine at the Biodesign Institute located at Arizona State University.
ContributorsSlosky, Rachael Marie (Author) / Diehnelt, Chris (Thesis director) / Stafford, Phillip (Committee member) / Chemical Engineering Program (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2016-05
Description
Cases of heroin use and overdose are on the rise in the United States which has created what some call a public health crisis. Previous studies have investigated the beneficial effect of social interaction recovering addicts, and in animal models of addiction, social interaction can prevent or reverse the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine. This study sought to determine if social interaction would prevent or diminish a conditioned preference for a heroin-paired context. Following establishment of baseline place preference, adult male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent once daily conditioning with either saline, heroin (1 mg/kg), or the animal's cage-mate for a total of 8 conditioning sessions. Assessment of post-conditioning place preference revealed that both the heroin injections and the presence of the cage-mate produced a place preference . In contrast to the findings of previous studies using cocaine as the conditioning drug, it was determined that rats preferred the heroin-paired context over that paired with the cage-mate.. These findings suggest that the protective effects of social interaction found in prior studies using cocaine as the conditioning drug may not extend to opiates, perhaps a result of stronger contextual conditioning and/or rewarding effects of this class of abused drugs.
ContributorsMarble, Krista Lillian (Author) / Olive, M. Foster (Thesis director) / Tomek, Seven (Committee member) / Department of Psychology (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2017-12