Matching Items (2,638)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

Description
Analysis of Next Generation Service Corps (NGSC) and the Difference Engine (TDE) under the theory of systems change, a model for creating social change. This paper explains NGSC, TDE, and systems change. It then analyzes the systems change effect of NGSC and TDE using case studies of similar models, with

Analysis of Next Generation Service Corps (NGSC) and the Difference Engine (TDE) under the theory of systems change, a model for creating social change. This paper explains NGSC, TDE, and systems change. It then analyzes the systems change effect of NGSC and TDE using case studies of similar models, with NGSC being a leadership-development-based model of systems change, and TDE being a product-based model of systems change. Based on the case study analysis, it was determined that TDE has a more direct effect on communities, and NGSC has a longer-term impact. Ultimately, a hybrid of the two models is needed.
ContributorsKusek, Amber (Author) / Zaffar, Ehsan (Thesis director) / Baldwin, Kimberly (Committee member) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor) / Watts College of Public Service & Community Solut (Contributor) / School of Life Sciences (Contributor)
Created2022-12
Description

The status of Earth’s diversity is deteriorating quickly which will continue to impact humans’ way of life, as well as every other living creature, in all regions of the world. However, there are organizations taking action to protect biodiversity on our planet. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) is one

The status of Earth’s diversity is deteriorating quickly which will continue to impact humans’ way of life, as well as every other living creature, in all regions of the world. However, there are organizations taking action to protect biodiversity on our planet. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) is one of those organizations and includes 196 signatories from around the world who are committed to strategies to preserve their biodiversity (Secretariat). Indeed, 98% of the parties which have participated in the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) have created national biodiversity strategies (NBS) and action plans (NBSAPs) (Secretariat). Yet, there are still countries that have yet to partake in these efforts. America continues to hold out against ratifying the CBD and remains the only developed country without a National Biodiversity Strategy. As an NBS for the U.S. is under consideration, my goal is to understand what works from previous plans. In particular, I focus on stakeholder engagement in Conservation Biodiversity Action Plans. Stakeholder engagement is important because, without it, there may be insufficient levels of integration of the action plans, which can lead to the failure of the CBDs conservation efforts. To address this question, I analyze the 193 strategies created for countries across the globe. My review describes the ways that stakeholders are engaged in National Biodiversity Strategies for CBD member countries. All plans mention some form of engagement. The most common types mentioned are ‘Education’, ‘Communication’, and ‘Training’. Examining the plans further reveals that most forms of engagement often are just mentioned and not completed. Close to 58% of the engagement forms are only completed about 50% of the time. Exceptions are surveys, interviews, and workshops, which are each completed in over 70% of plans that mention them. I then use this information to provide practical recommendations for creating an effective NBSAP for the United States.

ContributorsOlofsson, Elisa (Author) / Gerber, Leah (Thesis director) / Kroetz, Kailin (Committee member) / Sterner, Beckett (Committee member) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor) / School of Life Sciences (Contributor)
Created2022-12
ContributorsOlofsson, Elisa (Author) / Gerber, Leah (Thesis director) / Kroetz, Kailin (Committee member) / Sterner, Beckett (Committee member) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor) / School of Life Sciences (Contributor)
Created2022-12
ContributorsOlofsson, Elisa (Author) / Gerber, Leah (Thesis director) / Kroetz, Kailin (Committee member) / Sterner, Beckett (Committee member) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor) / School of Life Sciences (Contributor)
Created2022-12
Description
This paper is a review of current scientific literature in the area of social isolation and health in both humans and nonhuman animals. Social isolation is an important subject today with social isolation generally increasing throughout human populations across the globe. Animals offer critical insights into certain mechanisms of social

This paper is a review of current scientific literature in the area of social isolation and health in both humans and nonhuman animals. Social isolation is an important subject today with social isolation generally increasing throughout human populations across the globe. Animals offer critical insights into certain mechanisms of social isolation. While assessing social isolation in animals is quite different in comparison to humans, the results of experimentation often show that animals share similar biological responses to social isolation with humans. Areas of social isolation research assessed in this paper include social isolation terms, methods and/or measurement, interventions (including environmental enrichment in animals), and biopathology. While some comparative studies exist that compare social isolation in humans and animals, this paper attempts to be a summative analysis of literature in multiple specific areas of social isolation research. The purpose of this literature review is to provide a perspective of first how social isolation is defined, of how it is measured, and finally the significance of both humans' and animals' biological responses to social isolation. Of these areas, comparisons between humans and animals offer critical insights for future social isolation research.
ContributorsKolodisner, Jude (Author) / Pohl, Janet (Thesis director) / Snyder-Mackler, Noah (Committee member) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor) / School of Life Sciences (Contributor)
Created2022-12
Description
Voluntary participation is a common teaching practice used to engage students and is often used in undergraduate STEM classrooms. The body of literature is growing regarding participation, specifically how it can be used and what it can include (e.g., letting students ask questions and/or answer questions during class). Since the

Voluntary participation is a common teaching practice used to engage students and is often used in undergraduate STEM classrooms. The body of literature is growing regarding participation, specifically how it can be used and what it can include (e.g., letting students ask questions and/or answer questions during class). Since the body of literature is growing, there is also increasing potential for there to be variation in how participation is defined or interpreted by researchers, educators, etc. To my knowledge, there is no study that has explored the extent to which there is variation in 1) the term voluntary participation across STEM peer-reviewed articles, 2) the definition of the terms used by investigators in articles regarding voluntary participation, and 3) the examples used by investigators regarding voluntary participation. The data set in this study consists of a multi-step literature review and nine peer-reviewed research articles regarding voluntary participation in science undergraduate courses from 2010 to 2022. The analysis revealed that: 1) 78% of articles use the term and of those, 44% of articles clearly define the term in the context of the research; 2) 22% do not use the term and instead use an umbrella term (e.g., active learning). This study provides insight into how voluntary participation is used across different contexts, and how it can be conceptualized in a variety of spaces, which can allow for instructors and educators to make informed decisions before using it as a teaching practice.
ContributorsWinton, Makena (Author) / Collins , James (Thesis director) / Nadile, Erika (Committee member) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor) / School of Life Sciences (Contributor) / School of Molecular Sciences (Contributor)
Created2022-12