Filtering by
- Creators: Novak, Gail (Pianist)
Experimental Design: In part one of this study, exercise-induced eccrine sweat was collected from 50 healthy individuals and analyzed using mass spectrometry, protein microarrays, and quantitative ELISAs to identify a broad range of proteins, antibody isotypes, and cytokines in sweat. In part two of this study, cortisol and melatonin levels were analyzed in exercise-induced sweat and plasma samples collected from 22 individuals.
Results: 220 unique proteins were identified by shotgun analysis in pooled sweat samples. Detectable antibody isotypes include IgA (100% positive; median 1230 ± 28 700 pg/mL), IgD (18%; 22.0 ± 119 pg/mL), IgG1 (96%;1640 ± 6750 pg/mL), IgG2 (37%; 292 ± 6810 pg/mL), IgG3 (71%;74.0 ± 119 pg/mL), IgG4 (69%; 43.0 ± 42.0 pg/mL), and IgM (41%;69.0 ± 1630 pg/mL). Of 42 cytokines, three were readily detected in all sweat samples (p<0.01). The median concentration for interleukin-1α was 352 ± 521 pg/mL, epidermal growth factor was 86.5 ± 147 pg/mL, and angiogenin was 38.3 ± 96.3 pg/mL. Multiple other cytokines were detected at lower levels. The median and standard deviation of cortisol was determined to be 4.17 ± 11.1 ng/mL in sweat and 76.4 ± 28.8 ng/mL in plasma. The correlation between sweat and plasma cortisol levels had an R-squared value of 0.0802 (excluding the 2 highest sweat cortisol levels). The median and standard deviation of melatonin was determined to be 73.1 ± 198 pg/mL in sweat and 194 ± 93.4 pg/mL in plasma. Similar to cortisol, the correlation between sweat and plasma melatonin had an R-squared value of 0.117.
Conclusion: These studies suggest that sweat holds more proteomic and hormonal biomarkers than previously thought and may eventually serve as a noninvasive biomarker resource. These studies also highlight many of the challenges associated with monitoring sweat content including differences between collection devices and hydration, evaporation losses, and sweat rate.
On 6 May 1952, at King’s College London in London, England, Rosalind Franklin photographed her fifty-first X-ray diffraction pattern of deoxyribosenucleic acid, or DNA. Photograph 51, or Photo 51, revealed information about DNA’s three-dimensional structure by displaying the way a beam of X-rays scattered off a pure fiber of DNA. Franklin took Photo 51 after scientists confirmed that DNA contained genes. Maurice Wilkins, Franklin’s colleague showed James and Francis Crick Photo 51 without Franklin’s knowledge. Watson and Crick used that image to develop their structural model of DNA. In 1962, after Franklin’s death, Watson, Crick, and Wilkins shared the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their findings about DNA. Franklin’s Photo 51 helped scientists learn more about the three-dimensional structure of DNA and enabled scientists to understand DNA’s role in heredity.
In April 1953, Rosalind Franklin and Raymond Gosling, published “Molecular Configuration in Sodium Thymonucleate,” in the scientific journal Nature. The article contained Franklin and Gosling’s analysis of their X-ray diffraction pattern of thymonucleate or deoxyribonucleic acid, known as DNA. In the early 1950s, scientists confirmed that genes, the heritable factors that control how organisms develop, contained DNA. However, at the time scientists had not determined how DNA functioned or its three-dimensional structure. In their 1953 paper, Franklin and Gosling interpret X-ray diffraction patterns of DNA fibers that they collected, which show the scattering of X-rays from the fibers. The patterns provided information about the three-dimensional structure of the molecule. “Molecular Configuration in Sodium Thymonucleate” shows the progress Franklin and Gosling made toward understanding the three-dimensional structure of DNA.