![190882-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2023-12/190882-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=EY8AyqSy1e8U6OySyUqN8.892Mo.rQ3W&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240614/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240614T195907Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=d49060073182e5fa88c9479db287c2e996eb17f7247bf4f853c02c5025b5673f&itok=gohiO1TL)
![189378-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2023-08/189378-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=ztP3xOhPYPebWyxQ2P6IX11smCdpvpSg&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240616/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240616T024349Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=fcfc982a355a71cef0feebefd2e17d1ebb5b7f6e722a1dccfce5dfef4bca6c0e&itok=6tAGn0nH)
Insect pheromones are crucial for survival and reproduction because they influence insect behavior, communication, and interactions within and outside the colony. Honey bees (Apis mellifera) have one of the most complex pheromonal communication systems. One pheromone, known as Queen Mandibular Pheromone (QMP), is released by the queen bee to regulate physiology, behavior, and gene expression in the female worker caste. The pheromone acts as a signal of queen presence that suppresses worker reproduction. In the absence of reproduction, young workers focus on taking care of the queen and larvae, known as nurse tasks, while older workers forage. In nurse bees, QMP has fundamental physiological impacts, including increasing abdominal lipid stores and increasing the protein content of hypopharyngeal glands (HPG). The HPG are worker-specific glands that can synthesize royal jelly used in colony nourishment. In workers, larger HPG signifies the ability to secrete royal jelly, while shrunken glands are characteristic of foragers that do not make jelly. While it is known that QMP increases abdominal lipid stores, the underlying mechanism is unclear: Does the pheromone simply make workers consume more pollen which provides lipids and protein, or does QMP also increase lipogenesis? In this study, I measured abdominal lipogenesis as fatty acid synthase (FAS) activity and monitored abdominal protein content and HPG size in caged, nurse-aged worker bees. In cages, workers were exposed to QMP or not, and they were provided with a lipid less diet in a full factorial design experiment. I found that QMP did not influence abdominal FAS activity or protein, but significantly increased HPG size. The data also revealed a significant positive correlation between abdominal protein and HPG size. My results do not support the idea that QMP modulates lipogenesis in worker bees, but my data can be interpreted to reflect that QMP mobilizes abdominal protein for the production of jelly in the HPG. This finding is in line with a previous study revealing a role of honey bee Brood Pheromone in mobilization of a major protein used in jelly production. Overall, my results support a fundamental role of QMP in worker metabolic processes associated with colony nourishment.
Many organisms associate environmental events that occur together and can predict the outcome of the event. This ability is termed associative learning. Through associative learning, organisms are able to change their behavior to increase their fitness and survival. However, little is known about how these same learning processes proceed when subjects are not alone, but in a group. The behavior of conspecifics could serve as a cue for learning, similar to stimuli during individual learning. This study was designed to compare learning across rats exposed to a simple simultaneous discrimination task, either in an individual or a social learning setting. Sixteen rats were trained to choose between two corridors differentiated by visual stimuli (flashing or steady light). One of the two cues signaled that food was available in the feeders at the end of the corridor. Half of the rats were trained individually and the other half were trained in groups of four. To compare the effect of the social training setting, all rats were tested independently and in a group. Next, contingencies were reversed and the previously non-reinforced cue now signaled the availability of food, and rats were again tested individually and in a group. The results suggest that the social setting interferes with the rats’ ability to make associations but makes the performance of the rats less sensitive to changes in their learning environment.
![168747-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2022-08/168747-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=e3Bq5WugkgQ1ty3TzdyS6GrEbE7muiUd&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240616/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240616T032635Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=66cacfd2a141e4e11e338e8f6ee5a4f52489a1bc48b154edc3efbc2d38b62f25&itok=caTysijU)
![193495-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2024-05/193495-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=ONJMthozVjAsqmm6eiqihva0A6TipB1i&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240616/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240616T005203Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=de569f0382f05f6fb20ac47d99e6784715742b0fbd1f8f3215289bb60b91ea52&itok=PKPKCQoD)
![193507-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2024-05/193507-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=blxv6g9wPGM8devugJFjvp3..nyOw_j5&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240615/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240615T191606Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=8a19854397513baff6a509a9cc5f657c59fd5f402f2b12b0d887c4c4283c30f3&itok=KSKvZQoe)
Maternal morbidity and mortality rates in the United States continues to rise, with a wide range of contributing factors such as mental illness, cardiovascular disease and systemic inequality. This metastudy provides a holistic view of the research that has been published on the issue of U.S. maternal healthcare from 2000-2022. The patterns of publications on specific topics over time can tell us what is perceived as a current major cause by physicians, public leaders, researchers, and the public. A deeper dive into systemic inequality as a cause of maternal morbidity and mortality highlights it as a major contributor to these high rates, but that progress is slowly being made through the implementation of detection and prevention tactics, as well as accessible prenatal programs and care.