![134621-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-05/134621-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=7QP.AdKi8LPDC3GiqS3_Vv0oS47DiHUt&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240616/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240616T010210Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=e77c9007930cf324371e0b909c2914a7bdaeb472c448e1f7fdb157c29669d004&itok=Le9qdu76)
PRP and Prolotherapy are individual treatments that were even suggested and used in combination with stem cell therapies. Prolotherapy predates PRP as a chemical irritant therapy originally used to sclerose tissues. Prolotherapy is meant to stimulate platelet derived growth factors release to improve tissue healing response. Prolotherapy shows negligible efficacy improvements over corticosteroids, but may have underlying side effects from being an irritant. PRP is a more modern therapy for improved healing. Speculations state initial use was in an open heart surgery to improve healing post-surgery. PRP is created via centrifugation of patient blood to isolate growth factors by removing serum and other biological components to increase platelet concentration. PRP is comparable to corticosteroid injections in efficacy, but as an autologous application, there are no side effects making it more advantageous. Growth factors induce healing response and reduce inflammation. Growth factors stimulate cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, and stimulate cellular response mechanism such as angiogenesis and mitogenesis. The growth factor stimulation of PRP and prolotherapy both assist stem cell proliferation. Additional research is needed to determine differential capacity to ensure multipotent stem cells regenerate the correct cell type from the increased differential capacity offered by growth factor recruitment. The application of combination therapy for stem cells is unsubstantiated and applications violate FDA ‘minimal manipulation’ guidelines.
![135371-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-05/135371-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=XNxmBVo45C9abX4tTWzrtFnBNMjwuygB&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240616/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240616T010529Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=5371a41dfcb58c574950c704a64aea9298967f3787bfca08a73b99c5565e9360&itok=cSeIzTYR)
![135297-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-05/135297-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=3jBiTp0tDUjhvBMv8ttmvxlpcM8JT2iy&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240616/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240616T004500Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=e241d7e74112e4a56175ada928ea465742183279045e6982f571af3a8cf803cb&itok=cBHssGXi)
![135360-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-05/135360-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=hcKTA5LUIG2znS9KKtJHrb9R55Z5OAQo&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240616/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240616T010529Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=35e22f6c7c4295b18060b6576b77ddd31c66f0946e3fbe3b94fcf55ab414cec1&itok=upvC0Rf0)
For this experiment, two Sets of 50 µl blood plasma samples were provided by NYU Medical School. These samples were then analyzed by Dr. Borges’s lab so that they contained normalized biomarker levels from patients with stage 1 adenocarcinoma and control patients with matched age, smoking status, and gender were examined. An ROC curve was constructed under individual and paired conditions and AUC calculated in Wolfram Mathematica 10.2. Methods such as increasing size of training set, using hard vs. soft margins, and processing biomarkers together and individually were used in order to increase the AUC. Using a soft margin for this particular data set was proved to be most useful compared to the initial set hard margin, raising the AUC from 0.6013 to 0.6585. In regards to which biomarkers yielded the better value, 6-Glc/6-Man and 3,6-Gal glycan node ratios had the best with 0.7687 AUC and a sensitivity of .7684 and specificity of .6051. While this is not enough accuracy to become a primary diagnostic tool for diagnosing stage I adenocarcinoma, the methods examined in the paper should be evaluated further. . By comparison, the current clinical standard blood test for prostate cancer that has an AUC of only 0.67.
![134770-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2021-05/134770-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=i0jxyJthXsB0WY2djwOCjSZJDxEqd9UR&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240615/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240615T172908Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=f95d9ab96dea6fdd218452035086ad968aec4aa0edfb0a947f3301b35ef65cea&itok=YdMq6zzN)
![168413-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2022-08/168413-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=f.i8pik6c4JygaCuFobm_EW.xtVotUM_&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240615/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240615T213335Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=1df0fe6f9ae6a9c89582b47e8cdd1d19f649ace13580b946b66368259c7f8ed4&itok=lsAeBdKy)
![168657-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2022-08/168657-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=JFezdxPIkLecY8vPmT9heX06oZaQpU3O&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240615/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240615T084652Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=a1ee20b3ffbc55f15329cae76f2d568500cb66e197225118a39f48d4c51b91a0&itok=ZzNzepKJ)
![168823-Thumbnail Image.png](https://d1rbsgppyrdqq4.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/styles/width_400/public/2022-08/168823-Thumbnail%20Image.png?versionId=dB435eJ4GKr81GmPdGY.GWO0eBo4DC_Y&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIASBVQ3ZQ42ZLA5CUJ/20240616/us-west-2/s3/aws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20240616T030141Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=120&X-Amz-Signature=e400af2a9e51aaf9aa545979e3b8ff8cc4dff1995315e7e2a7658584f3f5c073&itok=CTOJ1AkT)
In cold chain tracking systems, accuracy and flexibility across different temperatures ranges plays an integral role in monitoring biospecimen integrity. However, while two common cold chain tracking systems are currently available (electronic and physics/chemical), there is not an affordable cold chain tracking mechanism that can be applied to a variety of temperatures while maintaining accuracy for individual vials. Hence, our lab implemented our understanding of biochemical reaction kinetics to develop a new cold chain tracking mechanism using the permanganate/oxalic acid reaction. The permanganate/oxalic acid reaction is characterized by the reduction of permanganate (MnVII) to Mn(II) with Mn(II)-autocatalyzed oxidation of oxalate to CO2, resulting in a pink to colorless visual indicator change when the reaction system is not in the solid state (i.e., frozen or vitrified). Throughout our research, we demonstrate, (i) Improved reaction consistency and accuracy along with extended run times with the implementation of a nitric acid-based labware washing protocol, (ii) Simulated reaction kinetics for the maximum length reaction and 60-minute reaction based on previously developed MATLAB scripts (iii) Experimental reaction kinetics to verify the simulated MATLAB maximum and 60-minute reactions times (iv) Long-term stability of the permanganate/oxalic acid reaction with water or eutectic solutions of sodium perchlorate and magnesium perchlorate at -80°C (v) Reaction kinetics with eutectic solvents, sodium perchlorate and magnesium perchlorate, at 25°C, 4°C, and -8°C (vi) Accelerated reaction kinetics after the addition of varying concentrations of manganese perchlorate (vii) Reaction kinetics of higher concentration reaction systems (5x and 10x; for darker colors), at 25°C (viii) Long-term stability of the 10x higher concentration reaction at -80°C.