Matching Items (4)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

151216-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
The unpleasant bitter taste found in many nutritious vegetables may deter people from consuming a healthy diet. We investigated individual differences in taste perception and whether these differences influence the effectiveness of bitterness masking. To test whether phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) `supertasters' also taste salt and sugar with greater intensity, as suggested

The unpleasant bitter taste found in many nutritious vegetables may deter people from consuming a healthy diet. We investigated individual differences in taste perception and whether these differences influence the effectiveness of bitterness masking. To test whether phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) `supertasters' also taste salt and sugar with greater intensity, as suggested by Bartoshuk and colleagues (2004), we infused strips of paper with salt water or sugar water. The bitterness rating of the PTC strip had a significant positive linear relationship with ratings of both the intensity of sweet and salt, but the effect sizes were very low, suggesting that the PTC strip does not give a complete picture of tasting ability. Next we investigated whether various seasonings could mask the bitter taste of vegetables and whether this varied with tasting ability. We found that sugar decreased bitterness and lemon decreased liking for vegetables of varying degrees of bitterness. The results did not differ by ability to taste any of the flavors. Therefore, even though there are remarkable individual differences in taste perception, sugar can be used to improve the initial palatability of vegetables and increase their acceptance and consumption.
ContributorsWilkie, Lynn Melissa (Author) / Phillips, Elizabeth D. (Thesis advisor) / Cohen, Adam (Committee member) / Johnston, Carol (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2012
156437-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Epidemiological studies have identified obesity as a risk factor for numerous chronic diseases such as adult onset diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. In both humans and laboratory animals, high-fat diets have been shown to cause obesity. Increases in dietary fat lead to increased energy consumption and, consequently, significant increases in body

Epidemiological studies have identified obesity as a risk factor for numerous chronic diseases such as adult onset diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. In both humans and laboratory animals, high-fat diets have been shown to cause obesity. Increases in dietary fat lead to increased energy consumption and, consequently, significant increases in body fat content. CD36 has been implicated in fat perception, preference, and increased consumption, but it is yet to be tested using a behavior paradigm. To study the effect of CD36 on fat taste transmission and fat consumption, four CD36 knockout (experimental) mice and four Black 6 wildtype (control) mice underwent 20 days of fat preference and perception testing. Both groups of mice were exposed to foods with progressively increasing fat content (10%, 12.5%, 15% 17.5%, 20%, 45%) in order to assess the effect of CD36 on fat preference. Afterward, the mice were subjected to an aversive conditioning protocol designed to test the effect of CD36 on fat taste perception; development of a conditioned taste aversion was indicative of ability to taste fat. Especially, knockout mice exhibited diminished preference for and reduced consumption of fat during preference testing and were unable to identify fat taste as the conditioned stimulus during aversive conditioning. A repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction revealed a significant main effect of group on fat consumption, energy intake, and weight. Linear regression revealed CD36 status to account for a majority of observed variance in fat consumption across both phases of the experiment. These results implicate CD36 in fat taste perception and preference and add to the growing body of evidence suggesting fat as a primary taste.
ContributorsJasbi, Paniz (Author) / Johnston, Carol (Thesis advisor) / Lespron, Christy (Committee member) / Wadhera, Devina (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018
187659-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

In 2020, approximately 55% of households facing food insecurity participated in one or more of the three largest federal nutrition assistance programs. Food insecurity rates have been relatively unchanged since 2019 but federal nutrition assistance programs have continued to see a decline in participation. Many families meet the income guidelines

In 2020, approximately 55% of households facing food insecurity participated in one or more of the three largest federal nutrition assistance programs. Food insecurity rates have been relatively unchanged since 2019 but federal nutrition assistance programs have continued to see a decline in participation. Many families meet the income guidelines to participate in both the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) programs, yet almost half of those participants are not utilizing WIC. The WIC program is an essential safety net for low-income families to combat food insecurity and improve diet quality. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in household characteristics among families participating in SNAP only and households participating in both SNAP and WIC. Additionally, we examined potential barriers and facilitators to participating in WIC among WIC-eligible SNAP participants. Hispanics made up 40% of SNAP Only households and about 65% of SNAP and WIC. Households with a larger number of beneficiaries and those with an infant in the household were more likely to participate in both SNAP and WIC. The main barriers identified by respondents previously enrolled in WIC were a lack of knowledge regarding WIC eligibility and issues with appointments. The two most common misconceptions regarding WIC eligibility were being unaware that simultaneous enrollment in both programs was allowable, and being unaware that household members were still eligible for WIC services. For the facilitators toward WIC enrollment, more than half of respondents knew to enroll in WIC when they needed nutrition or breastfeeding assistance. Results from this study suggest the need for targeted outreach campaigns that highlight the possibility and benefits of dual participation in SNAP and WIC. Understanding how SNAP can increase enrollment in WIC demonstrates to policymakers the benefits of streamlining the certification process.

ContributorsWaxman, Cayla (Author) / Ohri-Vachaspati, Punam (Thesis advisor) / Wadhera, Devina (Committee member) / Whisner, Corrie (Committee member) / Melnick, Emily (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023
171470-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Purpose: Although numerous studies exist regarding the health impact of the Special, Supplemental Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) on their participants’, limited studies have examined how participation in one federal nutrition assistance program, may impact participation or perceived benefit of the

Purpose: Although numerous studies exist regarding the health impact of the Special, Supplemental Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) on their participants’, limited studies have examined how participation in one federal nutrition assistance program, may impact participation or perceived benefit of the other. This study aimed to examine how SNAP participation may impact weight-related pregnancy outcomes and participation of pregnant WIC participants. Methods: The present study is a cross-sectional, secondary data analysis of data available from the Arizona Department of Health Services. A total of 35,659 pregnant woman participated in the Arizona WIC program during 2018 and were included in the study. Pregnant participants were assigned to Group WIC or Group WIC+SNAP respectively. Data was aggregated to the clinic level and clinics with less than 10 pregnant participants were combined for a total of 101 clinics included in the analysis. Weight-related pregnancy outcomes measures included average pre-pregnancy weight, average gestational weight gain, BMI class, and delivery weight. Participation indicator outcomes included average number of visits during pregnancy, timing of first prenatal and postnatal WIC appointment, and entry into WIC within the first trimester. Race, ethnicity, language, and education were also analyzed. Results: This study found average pre-pregnancy weight was statistically significant for women in group SNAP+WIC weighing 2.8 kg more than women in group WIC(p<0.001). Group WIC had a lower delivery weight average (p<0.001) and a higher amount of women beginning pregnancy with a normal BMI (p=0.004). Group WIC participants were statistically more likely to not enroll in WIC during the first trimester compared with Group WIC+SNAP (p=0.049). Group WIC was more likely to enroll in the 8th (p=0.045) and 9th month (p=0.009) of pregnancy and attend their first postpartum visit 6 months after delivery (p=0.007) as compared to Group WIC+SNAP. Conclusions: This study found that pregnant WIC participants, not enrolled in SNAP have a lower pre-pregnancy weight and are more likely not to enroll within the first trimester. Future research should focus on individualized characteristics of WIC participants to further improve prenatal and postnatal support.
ContributorsStolworthy, Alexandra (Author) / Bruening, Meg (Thesis advisor) / Wadhera, Devina (Committee member) / Whisner, Corrie (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2022