Matching Items (3)
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Evolution (Biology)--History--20th century.
- Creators: Collins, James
- Creators: Ulett, Mark Andrew
Description
This dissertation shows that the central conceptual feature and explanatory motivation of theories of evolutionary directionality between 1890 and 1926 was as follows: morphological variation in the developing organism limits the possible outcomes of evolution in definite directions. Put broadly, these theories maintained a conceptual connection between development and evolution as inextricably associated phenomena. This project develops three case studies. The first addresses the Swiss-German zoologist Theodor Eimer's book Organic Evolution (1890), which sought to undermine the work of noted evolutionist August Weismann. Second, the American paleontologist Edward Drinker Cope's Primary Factors (1896) developed a sophisticated system of inheritance that included the material of heredity and the energy needed to induce and modify ontogenetic phenomena. Third, the Russian biogeographer Leo Berg's Nomogenesis (1926) argued that the biological world is deeply structured in a way that prevents changes to morphology taking place in more than one or a few directions. These authors based their ideas on extensive empirical evidence of long-term evolutionary trajectories. They also sought to synthesize knowledge from a wide range of studies and proposed causes of evolution and development within a unified causal framework based on laws of evolution. While being mindful of the variation between these three theories, this project advances "Definitely Directed Evolution" as a term to designate these shared features. The conceptual coherence and reception of these theories shows that Definitely Directed Evolution from 1890 to 1926 is an important piece in reconstructing the wider history of theories of evolutionary directionality.
ContributorsUlett, Mark Andrew (Author) / Laubichler, Manfred D (Thesis advisor) / Hall, Brian K (Committee member) / Lynch, John (Committee member) / Maienschein, Jane (Committee member) / Smocovitis, Vassiliki B (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2014
Description
How fast is evolution? In this dissertation I document a profound change that occurred around the middle of the 20th century in the way that ecologists conceptualized the temporal and spatial scales of adaptive evolution, through the lens of British plant ecologist Anthony David Bradshaw (1926–2008). In the early 1960s, one prominent ecologist distinguished what he called “ecological time”—around ten generations—from “evolutionary time”— around half of a million years. For most ecologists working in the first half of the 20th century, evolution by natural selection was indeed a slow and plodding process, tangible in its products but not in its processes, and inconsequential for explaining most ecological phenomena. During the 1960s, however, many ecologists began to see evolution as potentially rapid and observable. Natural selection moved from the distant past—a remote explanans for both extant biological diversity and paleontological phenomena—to a measurable, quantifiable mechanism molding populations in real time.
The idea that adaptive evolution could be rapid and highly localized was a significant enabling condition for the emergence of ecological genetics in the second half of the 20th century. Most of what historians know about that conceptual shift and the rise of ecological genetics centers on the work of Oxford zoologist E. B. Ford and his students on polymorphism in Lepidotera, especially industrial melanism in Biston betularia. I argue that ecological genetics in Britain was not the brainchild of an infamous patriarch (Ford), but rather the outgrowth of a long tradition of pastureland research at plant breeding stations in Scotland and Wales, part of a discipline known as “genecology” or “experimental taxonomy.” Bradshaw’s investigative activities between 1948 and 1968 were an outgrowth of the specific brand of plant genecology practiced at the Welsh and Scottish Plant Breeding stations. Bradshaw generated evidence that plant populations with negligible reproductive isolation—separated by just a few meters—could diverge and adapt to contrasting environmental conditions in just a few generations. In Bradshaw’s research one can observe the crystallization of a new concept of rapid adaptive evolution, and the methodological and conceptual transformation of genecology into ecological genetics.
The idea that adaptive evolution could be rapid and highly localized was a significant enabling condition for the emergence of ecological genetics in the second half of the 20th century. Most of what historians know about that conceptual shift and the rise of ecological genetics centers on the work of Oxford zoologist E. B. Ford and his students on polymorphism in Lepidotera, especially industrial melanism in Biston betularia. I argue that ecological genetics in Britain was not the brainchild of an infamous patriarch (Ford), but rather the outgrowth of a long tradition of pastureland research at plant breeding stations in Scotland and Wales, part of a discipline known as “genecology” or “experimental taxonomy.” Bradshaw’s investigative activities between 1948 and 1968 were an outgrowth of the specific brand of plant genecology practiced at the Welsh and Scottish Plant Breeding stations. Bradshaw generated evidence that plant populations with negligible reproductive isolation—separated by just a few meters—could diverge and adapt to contrasting environmental conditions in just a few generations. In Bradshaw’s research one can observe the crystallization of a new concept of rapid adaptive evolution, and the methodological and conceptual transformation of genecology into ecological genetics.
ContributorsPeirson, Bruce Richard Erick (Author) / Laubichler, Manfred D (Thesis advisor) / Maienschein, Jane (Thesis advisor) / Creath, Richard (Committee member) / Collins, James (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015
Description
Using a simple $SI$ infection model, I uncover the
overall dynamics of the system and how they depend on the incidence
function. I consider both an epidemic and endemic perspective of the
model, but in both cases, three classes of incidence
functions are identified.
In the epidemic form,
power incidences, where the infective portion $I^p$ has $p\in(0,1)$,
cause unconditional host extinction,
homogeneous incidences have host extinction for certain parameter constellations and
host survival for others, and upper density-dependent incidences
never cause host extinction. The case of non-extinction in upper
density-dependent
incidences extends to the case where a latent period is included.
Using data from experiments with rhanavirus and salamanders,
maximum likelihood estimates are applied to the data.
With these estimates,
I generate the corrected Akaike information criteria, which
reward a low likelihood and punish the use of more parameters.
This generates the Akaike weight, which is used to fit
parameters to the data, and determine which incidence functions
fit the data the best.
From an endemic perspective, I observe
that power incidences cause initial condition dependent host extinction for
some parameter constellations and global stability for others,
homogeneous incidences have host extinction for certain parameter constellations and
host survival for others, and upper density-dependent incidences
never cause host extinction.
The dynamics when the incidence function is homogeneous are deeply explored.
I expand the endemic considerations in the homogeneous case
by adding a predator into the model.
Using persistence theory, I show the conditions for the persistence of each of the
predator, prey, and parasite species. Potential dynamics of the system include parasite mediated
persistence of the predator, survival of the ecosystem at high initial predator levels and
ecosystem collapse at low initial predator levels, persistence of all three species, and much more.
overall dynamics of the system and how they depend on the incidence
function. I consider both an epidemic and endemic perspective of the
model, but in both cases, three classes of incidence
functions are identified.
In the epidemic form,
power incidences, where the infective portion $I^p$ has $p\in(0,1)$,
cause unconditional host extinction,
homogeneous incidences have host extinction for certain parameter constellations and
host survival for others, and upper density-dependent incidences
never cause host extinction. The case of non-extinction in upper
density-dependent
incidences extends to the case where a latent period is included.
Using data from experiments with rhanavirus and salamanders,
maximum likelihood estimates are applied to the data.
With these estimates,
I generate the corrected Akaike information criteria, which
reward a low likelihood and punish the use of more parameters.
This generates the Akaike weight, which is used to fit
parameters to the data, and determine which incidence functions
fit the data the best.
From an endemic perspective, I observe
that power incidences cause initial condition dependent host extinction for
some parameter constellations and global stability for others,
homogeneous incidences have host extinction for certain parameter constellations and
host survival for others, and upper density-dependent incidences
never cause host extinction.
The dynamics when the incidence function is homogeneous are deeply explored.
I expand the endemic considerations in the homogeneous case
by adding a predator into the model.
Using persistence theory, I show the conditions for the persistence of each of the
predator, prey, and parasite species. Potential dynamics of the system include parasite mediated
persistence of the predator, survival of the ecosystem at high initial predator levels and
ecosystem collapse at low initial predator levels, persistence of all three species, and much more.
ContributorsFarrell, Alexander E. (Author) / Thieme, Horst R (Thesis advisor) / Smith, Hal (Committee member) / Kuang, Yang (Committee member) / Tang, Wenbo (Committee member) / Collins, James (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2017