Matching Items (4)
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Quantitative psychology
- All Subjects: prenatal stress
- Genre: Masters Thesis
- Creators: Mackinnon, David P
- Status: Published
Description
The development of self-regulation is believed to play a crucial role in predicting later psychopathology and is believed to begin in early childhood. The early postpartum period is particularly important in laying the groundwork for later self-regulation as infants' dispositional traits interact with caregivers' co-regulatory behaviors to produce the earliest forms of self-regulation. Moreover, although emerging literature suggests that infants' exposure to maternal stress even before birth may be integral in determining children's self-regulatory capacities, the complex pathways that characterize these developmental processes remain unclear. The current study considers the complex, transactional processes in a high-risk, Mexican American sample. Data were collected from 305 Mexican American infants and their mothers during prenatal, 6- and 12-week home interviews. Mother self-reports of stress were obtained prenatally between 34-37 weeks gestation. Mother reports of infant temperamental negativity and surgency were obtained at 6-weeks as were observed global ratings of maternal sensitivity during a structured peek-a-boo task. Microcoded ratings of infants' engagement orienting and self-comforting behaviors were obtained during the 12-week peek-a-boo task. Study findings suggest that self-comforting and orienting behaviors help to modulate infants' experiences of distress, and also that prenatal stress influences infants' engagement in each of those regulatory behaviors, both directly by influence tendencies to engage in orienting behaviors and indirectly by programming higher levels of infant negativity and surgency, both of which may confer risk for later regulatory disadvantage. Advancing our understandings about the nature of these developmental pathways could have significant implications for targets of early intervention in this high-risk population.
ContributorsLin, Betty (Author) / Crnic, Keith A (Thesis advisor) / Lemery-Chalfant, Kathryn S (Committee member) / Mackinnon, David P (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2013
Description
Collider effects pose a major problem in psychological research. Colliders are third variables that bias the relationship between an independent and dependent variable when (1) the composition of a research sample is restricted by the scores on a collider variable or (2) researchers adjust for a collider variable in their statistical analyses. Both cases interfere with the accuracy and generalizability of statistical results. Despite their importance, collider effects remain relatively unknown in the social sciences. This research introduces both the conceptual and the mathematical foundation for collider effects and demonstrates how to calculate a collider effect and test it for statistical significance. Simulation studies examined the efficiency and accuracy of the collider estimation methods and tested the viability of Thorndike’s Case III equation as a potential solution to correcting for collider bias in cases of biased sample selection.
ContributorsLamp, Sophia Josephine (Author) / Mackinnon, David P (Thesis advisor) / Anderson, Samantha F (Committee member) / Edwards, Michael C (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2021
Description
This research explores tests for statistical suppression. Suppression is a statistical phenomenon whereby the magnitude of an effect becomes larger when another variable is added to the regression equation. From a causal perspective, suppression occurs when there is inconsistent mediation or negative confounding. Several different estimators for suppression are evaluated conceptually and in a statistical simulation study where we impose suppression and non-suppression conditions. For each estimator without an existing standard error formula, one was derived in order to conduct significance tests and build confidence intervals. Overall, two of the estimators were biased and had poor coverage, one worked well but had inflated type-I error rates when the population model was complete mediation. As a result of analyzing these three tests, a fourth was considered in the late stages of the project and showed promising results that address concerns of the other tests. When the tests were applied to real data, they gave similar results and were consistent.
ContributorsMuniz, Felix (Author) / Mackinnon, David P (Thesis advisor) / Anderson, Samantha F. (Committee member) / McNeish, Daniel M (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2020
Description
Statistical inference from mediation analysis applies to populations, however, researchers and clinicians may be interested in making inference to individual clients or small, localized groups of people. Person-oriented approaches focus on the differences between people, or latent groups of people, to ask how individuals differ across variables, and can help researchers avoid ecological fallacies when making inferences about individuals. Traditional variable-oriented mediation assumes the population undergoes a homogenous reaction to the mediating process. However, mediation is also described as an intra-individual process where each person passes from a predictor, through a mediator, to an outcome (Collins, Graham, & Flaherty, 1998). Configural frequency mediation is a person-oriented analysis of contingency tables that has not been well-studied or implemented since its introduction in the literature (von Eye, Mair, & Mun, 2010; von Eye, Mun, & Mair, 2009). The purpose of this study is to describe CFM and investigate its statistical properties while comparing it to traditional and casual inference mediation methods. The results of this study show that joint significance mediation tests results in better Type I error rates but limit the person-oriented interpretations of CFM. Although the estimator for logistic regression and causal mediation are different, they both perform well in terms of Type I error and power, although the causal estimator had higher bias than expected, which is discussed in the limitations section.
ContributorsSmyth, Heather Lynn (Author) / Mackinnon, David P (Thesis advisor) / Grimm, Kevin J. (Committee member) / Edwards, Michael C (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019