Filtering by
- All Subjects: Neuromodulation
- Creators: Buneo, Christopher
- Creators: Kleim, Jeffrey
Neuromodulation is an emerging field of research that has a proven therapeutic benefit on a number of neurological disorders, including epilepsy and stroke. It is characterized by using exogenous stimulation to modify neural activity. Prior studies have shown the positive effect of non-invasive trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) on motor learning. However, few studies have explored the effect of this specific neuromodulatory method on the underlying physiological processes, including heart rate variability (HRV), facial skin temperatures, skin conductance level, and respiratory rate. Here we present preliminary results of the effects of 3kHz supraorbital TNS on HRV using non-linear (Poincaré plot descriptors) and time-domain (SDNN) measures of analysis. Twenty-one (21) healthy adult subjects were randomly assigned to 2 groups: 3kHz Active stimulation (n=11) and Sham (n=10). Participants’ physiological markers were monitored continuously across three blocks: one ten-minute baseline block, one twenty-minute treatment block, and one ten-minute recovery block. TNS targeting the ophthalmic branches of the trigeminal nerve was delivered during the treatment block for twenty minutes in 30 sec. ON/OFF cycles. The active stimulation group exhibited larger values of all Poincaré descriptors and SDNN during blocks two and three, signifying increased HRV and autonomic nervous system activity.
In this experiment Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) scores are recorded daily to monitor mood differences between pre and post treatment (TENS vs Sham). PANAS scores were found to be insignificant between groups. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Fitbit were chosen to study perceived sleep, and objective sleep. Both PSQI, and Fitbit found insignificant differences between TENS and Sham. Finally, the Beck Depression and Beck Anxiety Inventories were administered weekly to determine if there are immediate changes to depressive and anxiety symptom, after a week of treatment (TENS vs Sham). A significant difference was found between the pre and post of the TENS treatment group. The TENS group was not found to be significantly different from Sham, potentially the result of a placebo effect. These results were found with n=10 participants in the TENS treatment group and n=6 in the sham group.
To better understand the inconsistent effects across rat motor cortex, US modulation of electrically-evoked movements was tested. A stimulation array was implanted on the cortical surface and US (200 kHz, 30-60 W/cm2 peak) was applied while measuring changes in the evoked forelimb and hindlimb movements. Direct US stimulation of the hindlimb was also studied. To test peripheral effects, rat blood glucose levels were measured while applying US near the liver.
No short-term motor modulation was visible (95% confidence interval: -3.5% to +5.1% forelimb, -3.8% to +5.5% hindlimb). There was significant long-term (minutes-order) suppression (95% confidence interval: -3.7% to -10.8% forelimb, -3.8% to -11.9% hindlimb). This suppression may be due to the considerable heating (+1.8°C between US
on-US conditions); effects of heat and US were not separable in this experiment. US directly evoked hindlimb and scrotum movements in some sessions. This required a long interval, at least 3 seconds between US bursts. Movement could be evoked with much shorter pulses than used in literature (3 ms). The EMG latency (10 ms) was compatible with activation of corticospinal neurons. The glucose modulation test showed a strong increase in a few trials, but across all trials found no significant effect.
The single motor response and the long refractory period together suggest that only the beginning of the US burst had a stimulatory effect. This would explain the lack of short-term modulation, and suggests future work with shorter pulses could better explore the missing forelimb response. During the refractory period there was no change in the electrically-evoked response, which suggests the US stimulation mechanism is independent of normal brain activity. These results challenge the literature-standard protocols and provide new insights on the unknown mechanism.